Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1

    Absolute Zero's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 05, 2003
    Location
    I'm slowly sinking in the posts of Mac-forums
    Posts
    1,246
    Specs:
    PowerBook 12" Combo Drive/867 MHz/256 MB RAM/40 GB hard drive/Mac OS X 10.3.5/AirPort Extreme it sux
    Exclamation XP Security > X Security

  2. #2
    Nightblade
    Guest
    Then shouldn't the title of this thread be "XP Security < X Security", or "X Security > XP Security". The "</>" symbols should always have the vertex point at the lesser of the two. The two vertices always face the greater.


    But of course, now that I've actually read the article, I can see that apparently XP is MORE secure than OS X. That is some frightening news, my friend...So why did you finish up by saying "OS X rules"? Sarcasm? After all, this article is insulting OS X and saying that in a particular factor, it's inferior to XP.

    Pretty disturbing, if you ask me....

  3. #3

    Absolute Zero's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 05, 2003
    Location
    I'm slowly sinking in the posts of Mac-forums
    Posts
    1,246
    Specs:
    PowerBook 12" Combo Drive/867 MHz/256 MB RAM/40 GB hard drive/Mac OS X 10.3.5/AirPort Extreme it sux
    "Windows is more secure than you think, and Mac OS X is worse than you ever imagined."

    XP Security > X Security is right.

    Now that I read your edit... yeah, because I know everyone is going to be "ohz it dont mattr, os x rulz" so I thought I would be sarcastic.

  4. #4
    Nightblade
    Guest
    Still, even though OS X had the highest percentage of extremely critical vulnerabilities, it still had the lowest number of actual advisories between 2003 and 2004, 10 less than XP.

  5. #5


    Member Since
    Dec 28, 2003
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    911
    Specs:
    15" MacBook Pro & 23" ACD
    Is this actually true? Xp is MORE secure the OS X???? I just bought a Dual 2 G5....please tell me OS X is more secure...I didn't just spend 5k for something that looks pretty....Did I?

  6. #6

    Absolute Zero's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 05, 2003
    Location
    I'm slowly sinking in the posts of Mac-forums
    Posts
    1,246
    Specs:
    PowerBook 12" Combo Drive/867 MHz/256 MB RAM/40 GB hard drive/Mac OS X 10.3.5/AirPort Extreme it sux
    No one has taken advantage of these holes yet... but when an exploit is created, you'll know about it and you will be able to protect yourself against it somehow. Then a week or so later, a fix may come out.

  7. #7


    Member Since
    Dec 28, 2003
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    911
    Specs:
    15" MacBook Pro & 23" ACD
    Quote Originally Posted by Absolute Zero
    No one has taken advantage of these holes yet... but when an exploit is created, you'll know about it and you will be able to protect yourself against it somehow. Then a week or so later, a fix may come out.

    So, you are saying that Windows has a superior security system to the Mac, but the Mac's just hasn't been exploited....Yeah...I'd say I'm starting to get worried.....I paid a premium price for an inferior system...Wow...I feel great :mad:

  8. #8

    GLJones's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 11, 2004
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    125
    Specs:
    1.6 ghz G5, Dual Monitors / 17" PowerBook 1.33 / 12" iBook
    The entire article is nothing worth worrying about. They are using their own arbitrary criteria for determining what a critical issue is. Also, Windows issues and OS X issues are very different. Windows doesn't have the same security methods so comparing would be hard.

    The reality is, OS X is MUCH more secure in the real world. Of all the updates posted since OS X came out, only ONE was considered critical by Apple. Over 1/2 of Microsoft's updates were labled critical.

    I have administered all three (Windows/Linux/OS X) types of servers and the Windows servers take much more work to keep running. My Linux server requires an occasional bit of maintenance and the OS X has never required anything more than the occasional Update from Apple. It just keeps running.

    Enjoy your Macs. They are far superior to PCs when it comes to viruses, spyware and crashing. Linux is comparable to OS X but OS X has a far superior GUI.

    Jerry

  9. #9
    d4rr3n
    Guest
    I wouldn't get too worked up over it applejustworks. There is no such thing as a 100% secure system and there never will be, everything has holes. OSX still has a major advantage over XP when it comes to viruses, worms, trojans, scripts, spyware, etc etc. I'd be more concerned about the money you spent on hardware than the operating system. If you wanted a secure OS and a powerful machine you could've bought an imac for using OS X and built a pc that would outperform the g5 and still have $1,500-2,000 left over easily.

  10. #10

    witeshark's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 09, 2004
    Location
    Miami FL
    Posts
    2,860
    Specs:
    G4 1Ghz OS X 10.4.7
    Simple, to be correct just replace the idiot article with GLJones post. Done

  11. #11

    Absolute Zero's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 05, 2003
    Location
    I'm slowly sinking in the posts of Mac-forums
    Posts
    1,246
    Specs:
    PowerBook 12" Combo Drive/867 MHz/256 MB RAM/40 GB hard drive/Mac OS X 10.3.5/AirPort Extreme it sux
    No Jones, no. It's nothing to worry about yet, but when there are exploits for these holes, then we will have to worry.

  12. #12

    MAC-simus's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 08, 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    442
    Specs:
    2GHz C2D macbook
    if you guys have carefuly read the articles by secunia you would notice that they do not specify which os X they tested. I think they are trying to mess with our minds.
    at some point (on one if the linked pages) they describe vulnerability of 10.2 jaguar.
    panther was never speaked of, as if it does not exist. as for windows Xp, they refer to the latest release. once again, they are avoiding to specify the Mac os X version and alway refer to it as X. I think this whole thing is froud and it wery well colides with resent XP "security bust up" bill gates was speaking of at the begining of the year.
    has anyone heard of https secure server based on windows technology? NO, most of them are UNIX systems, it speaks for itself, doesnt it?
    of course there are holes in X, but the data given by secunia is not an objective evaluation of OS X security

  13. #13

    rman's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 24, 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    12,584
    Specs:
    2 x 3.0GHz Quad-Core, 6GB OS X 10.6.8 | 15in MacBook Pro 2.2GHz OS X 10.6.8 | 64GB iPad 2 WiFi
    Cool
    There is a way to make sure your system is secure. Just don't take it out the box and don't turn it on. :p You can not be more secure than that, unless someone steals the box.
    Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass, It's about learning to dance in the rain!

  14. #14


    Member Since
    Dec 28, 2003
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    911
    Specs:
    15" MacBook Pro & 23" ACD
    thanks for all the support guys! d4rr3n, I didn't do that for several reasons:

    1. What are you basing your comment on: "..built a pc that could outperform the g5"?
    2. Even If I did believe there was a faster home built machine (I'm assuming you're calling the g5 slower when it has 1 GB Ram..Show me a home built PC with 8GBs of ram, and then tell me the PCs faster...lol) I wouldn't want to go super fast, and then crash every 10 minutes...I bought a Mac to escape from Doz...Doz is a living, or should I say not living, nightmare...
    3. I Love the design and architecture of the G5....The G5 was designed well, which is why it is so clean inside, and everything looks like it meant to go there. PC's are cramped.. If you try hard enough, you CAN fit everything inside a PC, it's just I'd rather have a machine that is designed for everything to have a place, more than a machine where I should "squeeze" everything in...

  15. #15

    witeshark's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 09, 2004
    Location
    Miami FL
    Posts
    2,860
    Specs:
    G4 1Ghz OS X 10.4.7
    That worthless article is a waste of a website, and spent more worthless text babbling about Linux, troll - o - matic pest!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. security
    By Thanksgivingday in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-27-2014, 07:17 PM
  2. Security?
    By Piggie in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-11-2012, 04:14 PM
  3. New to Wi-Fi security
    By cad2blender in forum Internet, Networking, and Wireless
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-03-2010, 05:37 PM
  4. security
    By appleXcore in forum OS X - Operating System
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-18-2009, 02:28 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-28-2008, 04:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •