Go Back  Mac-Forums.com  > Software > OS X - Operating System > Upgrade from Mac OS X to Snow??

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-03-2009, 06:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
Jesse

 
Member Since: Nov 03, 2009
Posts: 7
Jesse is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook: Mac OS X 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GB Memory iPod: 120 GB Classic
Upgrade from Mac OS X to Snow??

Im thinking about upgrading my fairly new Macbook to Snow Lep. Are there any big differences? Pros & Cons....... Is it worth my $30 bucks lol
Jesse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 06:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: The "Mac" House!
Posts: 3,023
pigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 25 Mac's & Counting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
Im thinking about upgrading my fairly new Macbook to Snow Lep. Are there any big differences?....... Is it worth my $30 bucks lol
Well...almost every major software update for probably the last 4-5 years has cost $100-$129 dollars...so is 10.6 (Snow Leopard) worth $30 bucks?

- Nick
__________________
Don't forget to use the reputation system.
pigoo3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
todd51

 
todd51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 30, 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,689
todd51 is just really nicetodd51 is just really nicetodd51 is just really nicetodd51 is just really nice
Mac Specs: iMac 27" quad-core i5, 4GB RAM, 1TB HDD, running 10.6
I agree with Nick on this one, it's INCREDIBLY cheap for what your getting out of it as a new OS. You may not notice a lot of speed differences right away, but in the upcoming years when more and more applications can take advantage of OpenCL and Grand Central Dispatch.

They are also already nearing the second major update for 10.6 as well, so I think Apple is staying on top of things.
todd51 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Jesse

 
Member Since: Nov 03, 2009
Posts: 7
Jesse is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook: Mac OS X 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GB Memory iPod: 120 GB Classic
OH WOW haha I see... well talk about cheap. Will the upgrade take up any GB space, plz take into consideration that im at 166.51GB due to music and boot camp...runnin xp .
Jesse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: The "Mac" House!
Posts: 3,023
pigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 25 Mac's & Counting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
OH WOW haha I see... well talk about cheap. Will the upgrade take up any GB space, plz take into consideration that im at 166.51GB due to music and boot camp...runnin xp .
Actually one of the better benefits of 10.6 is that it is significantly smaller than 10.5. I've heard folks recouping 5-10+ gigs of hard drive space!

- Nick
__________________
Don't forget to use the reputation system.
pigoo3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Jesse

 
Member Since: Nov 03, 2009
Posts: 7
Jesse is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook: Mac OS X 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GB Memory iPod: 120 GB Classic
Alright im convinced lol ill get it
Jesse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: The "Mac" House!
Posts: 3,023
pigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 25 Mac's & Counting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
Alright im convinced lol ill get it
At $29 bucks...it's definitely one of the best "bang for your buck" computer deals around!

- Nick
__________________
Don't forget to use the reputation system.
pigoo3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
todd51

 
todd51's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 30, 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,689
todd51 is just really nicetodd51 is just really nicetodd51 is just really nicetodd51 is just really nice
Mac Specs: iMac 27" quad-core i5, 4GB RAM, 1TB HDD, running 10.6
Haha, yea SL is pretty good for a thirty dollar OS. I think you made a good decision in upgrading.
todd51 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 08:40 PM   #9 (permalink)
vansmith

 
vansmith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,583
vansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of lightvansmith is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: 2.1C2D/4GB/320GB
Check the compatibility of your software first. If you use something that absolutely needs to work and it doesn't work with SL, you'll want to wait until it becomes SL ready. That said, I'm going to imagine that most products are SL ready at this point.
__________________
"It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant
Website : Twitter
Important Links: Community Guidelines : DVD Ripping Rules
M-F MotM - April 2009.
vansmith is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: The "Mac" House!
Posts: 3,023
pigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 25 Mac's & Counting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by vansmith View Post
Check the compatibility of your software first. If you use something that absolutely needs to work and it doesn't work with SL, you'll want to wait until it becomes SL ready. That said, I'm going to imagine that most products are SL ready at this point.
You have a great point there Vansmith...the "official" release of ONYX for Snow Leopard just came out...what...yesterday?

Since 10.6 was released on August 28th...that took approx. 65 days...so it's very possible some other important programs not compatible with Snow Leopard may still be awaiting updates.

Great Point,

- Nick
__________________
Don't forget to use the reputation system.
pigoo3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 09:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
toMACsh

 
Member Since: Jul 30, 2009
Posts: 377
toMACsh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigoo3 View Post
I've heard folks recouping 5-10+ gigs of hard drive space!
Have you actually seen the before and after yourself? As I noted in another thread MacWorld reported less than a 2GB gain, with 6GB being the maximum gain, assuming a full installation of Leopard including all printer drivers. Without that, you gain alot. SL identifies your printer(s) and only installs the drivers you need.
toMACsh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 11:23 AM   #12 (permalink)
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: The "Mac" House!
Posts: 3,023
pigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the roughpigoo3 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 25 Mac's & Counting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by toMACsh View Post
Have you actually seen the before and after yourself? As I noted in another thread MacWorld reported less than a 2GB gain, with 6GB being the maximum gain, assuming a full installation of Leopard including all printer drivers. Without that, you gain alot. SL identifies your printer(s) and only installs the drivers you need.
This is a well documented benefit of installing OS 10.6!!! I could supply you with enough links to "choke a horse"...but I will link just one from a fairly reputable source (Macintouch.com):

Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) Review

As you can see they saved/recovered 6.7 gigs of hard drive space!

- Nick
__________________
Don't forget to use the reputation system.
pigoo3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 01:31 PM   #13 (permalink)
monty007

 
monty007's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 04, 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 11
monty007 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 2.26 Ghz 160 GB, iMac 24" 2.8 Ghz 350 GB
after my upgrade I got about 5-6 GB of more free space
__________________
I love: my wife, my Mac's & exotic cars - in that order!
monty007 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 02:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
MYmacROX

 
MYmacROX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 17, 2009
Posts: 257
MYmacROX will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: 15" MBPro (mid 2008) 200GB Serial ATA 7200 rpm 2GB ram NVIDIA 256mb GeForce 8600M GT
Quote:
Originally Posted by toMACsh View Post
Have you actually seen the before and after yourself? As I noted in another thread MacWorld reported less than a 2GB gain, with 6GB being the maximum gain, assuming a full installation of Leopard including all printer drivers. Without that, you gain alot. SL identifies your printer(s) and only installs the drivers you need.
Over 20GB gain for myself!
Admittedly, that is on the high end compared with other users. I'd say a safe assumption for most would be 5 - 10.
MYmacROX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 02:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
toMACsh

 
Member Since: Jul 30, 2009
Posts: 377
toMACsh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigoo3 View Post
Snow Leopard (Mac OS X 10.6) Review

As you can see they saved/recovered 6.7 gigs of hard drive space!
I see that they saved 1.8GB under System. Perhaps that is the "under 2GB" the MacWorld article was referring to. And you would get more if you had all the unneeded printer drivers before.
toMACsh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mac OS X Combo upgrade? After installing SL vii OS X - Operating System 5 09-20-2009 05:08 PM
Running Windows on Mac rickmahmoud Windows, Classic, Linux, and Other OS 7 02-17-2008 12:31 AM
Mac Songs The mac 13 Switcher Hangout 6 12-23-2004 01:55 AM

 
 
 
     
Home Calendar Get New
     

Copyright ©2001-2009 Mac-Forums.com. All Rights Reserved. A division of iNET Interactive.

Other iNET Interactive Sites: Web Hosting Talk | Swish Talk | Hosting Catalog.com| Dev Papers| Deleted Domains| Hot Scripts

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.