OS X - Operating System General OS operation information and support

OS 10.5 - Is My Macbook Pro 64bit?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
fredthered83

 
Member Since: Jun 09, 2009
Posts: 3
fredthered83 is on a distinguished road

fredthered83 is offline
With the announcement of Snow Leopard being 64 bit, I have been trying to work out if my MBP, the first solid body mbp's, is 64 Bit.

As I am away from my MBP I cannot check out its specs and I am worried I am going to need a hardware upgrade to make the most of Snow Leopard

Can anyone help me out?
QUOTE Thanks
russell23

 
russell23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 02, 2009
Location: Chennai
Posts: 44
russell23 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 15.4" 2.4GHz C2D 2GB RAM 250GB HDD Mac OS X-10.5.8, Apple iPod nano 8GB Black

russell23 is offline
Hi,

Snow leopard, so far I have understood from the news and views, is 64 bit, means, its kernel runs in 64 bit mode. Leopard kernel runs in 32 bit mode.

So, if you have MBP, of 2007 model (If I am not wrong, since then, MBPs started using Intel Core 2 Duo, which can support 64 bit operations inside the chip.) or later, you don't have to go for a hardware upgrade and peacefully go ahead buying Snow Leopard....

May be the following links might help you clear your doubts in detail,

AppleInsider | Road to Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard: 64-Bits [Page 2].

Sometimes Apple makes its own lovers to feel very angry on its business moves...

Searching certainty in this Uncertain world!
QUOTE Thanks
dadsgravy

 
dadsgravy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 19, 2006
Location: Astoria, Or
Posts: 266
dadsgravy has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: MacBook,2Ghz CD,1.5GBRAM,100GBHD,SL.PowerbookG4 12"1Ghz,768MbRAM,40GBHD,Leopard.imac G3 400Mhz,10.4

dadsgravy is offline
yes it is. The only intel macs that aren't 64bit are the first ones to come out. Any intel mac with a core 2 duo processor is 64bit. It was just the core duo's that are 32bit. And they came out in may of 2006. Everything after november 2006 should be good to go. Except for some mac mini's.

You are with out a doubt good to go if you have a unibody mac.
QUOTE Thanks
fredthered83

 
Member Since: Jun 09, 2009
Posts: 3
fredthered83 is on a distinguished road

fredthered83 is offline
Thanks guys thats what I had thought (hoped) myself but needed to make sure. Bring on Snow Leopard sounds excellent
QUOTE Thanks
lifeisabeach

 
lifeisabeach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 30, 2007
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 5,787
lifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond reputelifeisabeach has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i3 (mid-2010) + OS 10.8; TV 2; iPhone 4S; iPad 1

lifeisabeach is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by dadsgravy View Post
yes it is. The only intel macs that aren't 64bit are the first ones to come out. Any intel mac with a core 2 duo processor is 64bit. It was just the core duo's that are 32bit. And they came out in may of 2006. Everything after november 2006 should be good to go. Except for some mac mini's.
Oh great. Come the release of Snow Leopard, everyone who bought the 32-bit Intel Macs are going to start crying over how Apple screwed them over.


Standing request for all troubleshooting: Please provide your Mac model/year and OS version. Also advise us if you have used or installed any antivirus, security, or "cleaning" software on your Mac. If you have installed MacKeeper in particular, you are hereby advised to uninstall it.
---------
If all else fails to fix your problem, read this tip.
QUOTE Thanks
dadsgravy

 
dadsgravy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 19, 2006
Location: Astoria, Or
Posts: 266
dadsgravy has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: MacBook,2Ghz CD,1.5GBRAM,100GBHD,SL.PowerbookG4 12"1Ghz,768MbRAM,40GBHD,Leopard.imac G3 400Mhz,10.4

dadsgravy is offline
naw. I've known for a couple of years now. So I'm done crying. The only thing I wont be able to do is run 64bit. But I can still install snow leopard and take advantage of most of its features.
Besides, it's time for a new computer anyway. It's been about three years. Anyone who cries over not being able to run 64bit apps with their first gen mac can stuff it. That's the price you pay for being first.
And there's a whole bunch of power PC users to keep us all company.
QUOTE Thanks
fredthered83

 
Member Since: Jun 09, 2009
Posts: 3
fredthered83 is on a distinguished road

fredthered83 is offline
Yea it was always going to move to full 64 bit, there isn't much Apple can do. Im just a bit ****** Im missing out on the new battery and sd slots.

The drop in the Price of the Air is interesting, if it had been that price before Christmas I would have made a hard decision between it and a new MBP
QUOTE Thanks
technologist

 
Member Since: Mar 30, 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 4,744
technologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond reputetechnologist has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 12" Apple PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz)

technologist is offline
Actually, there is nothing in the current requirements for Snow Leopard that require a 64-bit Mac, except for (obviously) 64-bit functions.

According to the current information, which may change before release, any Macintel with 1GB of memory will run SL.
Apple - Mac OS X Snow Leopard - Technical specifications
QUOTE Thanks
vansmith

 
vansmith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 15,329
vansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)

vansmith is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by technologist View Post
Actually, there is nothing in the current requirements for Snow Leopard that require a 64-bit Mac, except for (obviously) 64-bit functions.

According to the current information, which may change before release, any Macintel with 1GB of memory will run SL.
Apple - Mac OS X Snow Leopard - Technical specifications
To add to this, the SL "new technologies" page states the following:
Quote:
32-bit compatible.
To ensure simplicity and flexibility, Mac OS X still comes in one version that runs both 64-bit and 32-bit applications. So you don’t need to update everything on your system just to run a single 64-bit program. And new 64-bit applications work just fine with your existing printers, storage devices, and PCI cards.
The page technologist linked to also states that to get 64bit support, you will need a 64bit processor which implies to me that you are fine with a 32bit processor but you won't get 64bit support. Take this as you will.

Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
M-F Blog :: Write for the blog :: M-F IRC Channel - Chats every Sunday at 8PM EST.
QUOTE Thanks
russell23

 
russell23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 02, 2009
Location: Chennai
Posts: 44
russell23 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 15.4" 2.4GHz C2D 2GB RAM 250GB HDD Mac OS X-10.5.8, Apple iPod nano 8GB Black

russell23 is offline
From my understanding, Apple has done nothing new in Snow Leopard, as it clearly states, "Refined, not reinvented". As far as I observed, kernel is now capable of running in 64 bit mode utilizing the full hardware capabilities and applications like iChat, iCal are now running in 64 bit.

From a normal user's perspective, this is not going to make any big difference, as they cannot really appreciate the performance boost visually. But from a geeky users point of view and users who uses their Macs for extensive computing (number crunching programs), is clearly a step ahead.

But, all together Apple has done nothing new in Snow Leopard, except built a kernel and some applications runs in 64 bit mode.

But, at any cost, Mac is always Mac and nothing can compete with its stability

Searching certainty in this Uncertain world!
QUOTE Thanks
vansmith

 
vansmith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 15,329
vansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)

vansmith is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by russell23 View Post
But, at any cost, Mac is always Mac and nothing can compete with its stability
I'm sure some diehard non-OS X *nix users would find that debatable .

Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
M-F Blog :: Write for the blog :: M-F IRC Channel - Chats every Sunday at 8PM EST.
QUOTE Thanks
Dysfunction

 
Dysfunction's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 17, 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 6,534
Dysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant futureDysfunction has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 2008 and 2011 15" mbps, late 11 iMac, iPhone 4s, and too many ipods and other stuff

Dysfunction is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by vansmith View Post
I'm sure some diehard non-OS X *nix users would find that debatable .
Ironic though with a BSD avatar

mike
This machine kills fascists
Got # ? phear the command line!
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« which version 10.6 to dual boot with 10.5 | in leopard we can't send sms through blue teeth in address book, right? »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MacBook or MacBook Pro: Newbie needs help ? fld777 Apple Notebooks 8 03-29-2008 07:41 AM
MacBook Pro for portabilaty? imme Apple Notebooks 4 03-26-2008 09:50 PM
Windows XP 64bit on Macbook Pro davebradford Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac 2 01-28-2008 05:28 PM
well, i gota macbook goin from a macbook pro.. raptorkid700 Apple Notebooks 9 01-14-2008 03:13 PM
macbook vs. macbook pro for editing amyyy Movies and Video 1 09-05-2007 10:31 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?