01-02-2007, 02:02 PM #1
Small, Fast Web Browsers - Quick Roundup
- Member Since
- Apr 29, 2006
- St. Somewhere
- iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM
There has been lots of posting in this news group over the past few days on the topic of small, fast web browsers. I thought it might be helpful to post a quick summary:
Sunrise: available at http://www.sunrisebrowser.com/en/
Current version: 0.895.
Memory footprint: 22 MB real memory, 400 MB virtual memory
Bookmark Import: auto imports Safari bookmarks
Subjective: very fast to load and to load pages, supports lots of interesting features, including innovative graphical bookmarks. Somewhat quirky non-Mac looking interface, but very functional nonetheless. Missing only tabbed browsing to be a pretty nice browser. The author reports that tabbed browsing is available in the upcoming 1.0.0 release, to be made available soon.
Camino: available at http://www.caminobrowser.org/
Current version: 1.0.3
Memory footprint: 28 MB real memory, 396 MB virtual memory
Bookmark Import: Can import bookmarks from Safari, Firefox and Opera
Subjective: Very fast to load and to load pages. Uses same Gecko rendering engine from Firefox. Very much a Mac application, sporting a very nice look n feel that Mac users will be quite comfortable with.
BonEcho: available at http://www.beatnikpad.com/archives/2...4/firefox-2001
Current Version: 126.96.36.199
Memory Footprint: 37 MB real memory, 397 MB virtual memory
Bookmark Import: imports Safari bookmarks
Note: This is an optimized version of Firefox 188.8.131.52. Specific apps are availalable for G5 and Intel processors.
Subjective: Fast to load, feels lightening fast to load pages. A significant speed differential over the stock Firefox offering. Looks, feels and behaves like Firefox in all regards but speed, which is much better.
As a comparative note, Safari's memory footprint is 90MB real memory and 445 MB of virtual memory. The stock Firefox 1.5 takes 34 MB of real memory and 392 MB of virtual memory. This makes Safari the "heavyweight" of the group.
Note that I have not included OmniWeb, as it is paid software, while the rest of the above are all free.
Subjectively, after playing with all of these, BonEcho seems the best of them, given the full feature set, the average memory consumption and the excellent speed of operation.My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube with 1.2 GHz Upgrade
My iStuff: 64GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad4, 30GB iPod Video, 16GB iPod Touch
My OS': Mac OS X Lion, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS 9.2.2, openSUSE 10.3
I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007
01-03-2007, 09:20 AM #2
Very nice roundup...food for thought.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By shiner95 in forum OS X - Operating SystemReplies: 3Last Post: 03-18-2014, 01:16 PM
By Stella in forum OS X - Operating SystemReplies: 12Last Post: 05-29-2010, 01:13 AM
By XJ-linux in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your MacReplies: 8Last Post: 05-20-2010, 02:51 PM
By deutschegibbo in forum OS X - Operating SystemReplies: 3Last Post: 04-28-2010, 04:35 PM
By leopard-user1 in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 3Last Post: 02-24-2009, 09:05 PM