New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
OS X - Apps and Games Discussion of applications and games available for Mac OS X.

using "Q" to emulate x86


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
PowerBookG4

 
PowerBookG4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 08, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,190
PowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 8x3.0ghz 12gb ram 8800GT , MBP 2.16 2GB Ram 17 inch.

PowerBookG4 is offline
Hello everybody,
I have downloaded "Q" to emulate an x86 pc on my computer, I really have no need for this but to experiment, maybe run some windows only applications and also I would like to run a verizon card (if possible) that only works on my windows systems.

So my questions on "Q" are this. When I increase the amount of ram in the q does this mean that it is working off of my system ram or is it not using hardware ram and is doing it like virtual memory in windows where it is taking "fake" memory from the hard drive. Along with this question when I update other hardware information is it really using my actuall hardware to do this or is it emulating that as well?

Another question is if I wanted to emulate x86-64 on my powerbook as opposed to my powermac is my G4 capable of that or because it is not a 64 bit chip it is not possible?

Sorry if these questions don't make any sense I am just pretty much an experiment and therefore if somethign does not work then I don't really care, simply fooling around and learning as much as I can.

My Website
Blog
I love my hosting company!
I was on the M-F honor roll for Febuary:2006
QUOTE Thanks
Aptmunich

 
Aptmunich's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 09, 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 9,075
Aptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2

Aptmunich is offline
1. The ram you enter is your actual physical ram: Basically you are just allotting this program a certain portion of your systems ram. It will also use virtual memory though... (all apps do when the real ram is full)

2. It should be able to do x86-64, it can emulate anything you want theoretically, as it simulates them with software, it'll just be slower than emulating a regular x86 chip.
QUOTE Thanks
zeta101

 
Member Since: May 26, 2005
Location: Walsall, England
Posts: 243
zeta101 has a spectacular aura about

zeta101 is offline
Following on from what Aptmunich said, it would be pointless to use the x86-64 option unless you happen to only have a windows xp64 cd.

Be warned, windows xp will take many hours to install on your powerbook, and even then it will run very slow, I gave up on the install. You would be better off with 2000, 98, or even 95. The general rule of thumb is to use the oldest version of windows you can that the software you need still works.

Also this forum may be of interest to you (its for qemu, Q is the mac version of qemu) but this is the board for mac users ---> Here
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« More S/W recommendations wanted. | Archive with password »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mozilla dropping support for 10.1 and info on x86 port mmoy Switcher Hangout 0 07-05-2005 11:04 PM
A great thing no one has mentioned about OSX on x86 MadSkillzMan Apple Rumors and Reports 6 07-01-2005 04:31 PM
Darwine on OS X x86 mikeazorin OS X - Development and Darwin 0 06-21-2005 02:12 PM
x86 PCI/AGP cards in a MAC? idlingmike Switcher Hangout 1 02-09-2005 03:29 PM
x86 & PPC & Sparc? LuniX Schweb's Lounge 5 06-12-2004 08:12 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?