Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1


    Member Since
    Apr 01, 2010
    Posts
    102
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro on OS X Mavericks
    Which is better between VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop?
    I have heard bad things about Parallels, particularly that it is really slow, but it's been a while ago. I see that Parallels Desktop has a new version out that's saying it runs 40% faster than the previous version. I have never used it.

    I have used VMware Fusion before, but ever since upgrading from Leopard to Snow Leopard, I haven't gotten my hands on a copy of VMware Fusion that is compatible for Snow Leopard. However, now that I'm reading up on Parallels and how its website is saying it is faster than VMware Fusion and more people prefer it, I don't know what to think.

    Has anyone tried both of them who can tell me which one is faster and/or better? Thanks!
    - Currently using a MacBook Pro running OS X Mavericks
    - syncs with iPhone 5S, iPod Touch, and iPad Mini

  2. #2

    TattooedMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 19, 2009
    Location
    Waiting for a mate . . .
    Posts
    8,437
    Specs:
    21" iMac 2.9Ghz 16GB RAM - 10.11.3, iPhone6s & iPad Air 2 - iOS 9.2.1, ATV 4Th Gen tvOS, ATV3
    Dont forget to use the Reputation System if someone has helped you out !!!
    Arguing with a zealot is only slightly easier than tunneling through a mountain with your forehead!!!!!
    MoTM ☆☆☆

  3. #3

    Kevriano's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2006
    Location
    Crawley, England
    Posts
    4,558
    Specs:
    20" Intel iMac 2.4 Ghz/3G Ram/320HD, Snow Leopard. PBook G4, 1.5Ghz/1.5 Ram/250 HD, Leopard 10.5.6.
    +1 to that review.
    I used it and opted for Parallels in the end, because I like the look and the way it integrates, but there little between them really.
    Try my custom Mac Forums Search Engine: Mac Forums Google Search

    Please use the reputation system if you consider any help given useful (it's the little ✓/✘ on the left <---)


  4. #4

    rippingviper's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 20, 2009
    Location
    Selkirk, Manitoba
    Posts
    264
    Specs:
    MacBook Air 13" , 21.5" iMac i5, White iPhone 4s 32gig, iPad 3 white 16 gig, i5 Mac Mini
    I tried them both and I tried to remove them both. They both integrated well but I found the removal process especially if you integrated to a boot camp partition really didn't go over well. It messed up my windows installations on my bootcamp partition greatly then I ended up having to delete those partitions and re-install windows. Personally I just go with Boot-Camp built in from the get go as running natively is so much better then virtual. But if you do decide on one of them I'd recommend not using a boot camp partition and selecting integration into it. I'd just create an image and run off of that from my own personal experience.

    I also found both of them to perform around the same. I guess it really depends on what programs you are trying to run. If your trying to game boot-camp built in is the only way to go as virtual will lack in performance in pretty much all aspects as to natively.
    Show some Love give Reputation Reputation FAQ

  5. #5


    Member Since
    Sep 14, 2009
    Posts
    64
    I tried out VMware - was very good, but just stuck with Bootcamp.

    Have since installed Virtual box, freeware virtualisation from Sun - and it's excellent, and free.
    So, well 'worth' trying out first - seriously, very impressive.

    Coops

  6. #6

    pigoo3's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 20, 2008
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    34,559
    Specs:
    2011 13" MBP 2.3ghz, 8gig ram, OS 10.8.5
    Quote Originally Posted by TattooedMac View Post
    Nice review link. Of course nothing stands still in the computing world. The review compares Parallels 4 vs. VMware Fusion 2...Parallels is now up to version 6...and VMware Fusion is up to version 3.

    So maybe each product has gotten better.

    - Nick
    - Too many "beachballs", read this: Beachballs
    - Computer seems slower than it used to? Read this for some slow computer tips: Speedup
    - Almost full hard drive? Some solutions. Out of Space
    - Apple Battery Info. Battery

  7. #7

    Raz0rEdge's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 17, 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    8,503
    Specs:
    27" i7 iMac, 24" iMac, 13" Macbook Air, iPhone 6S, iPod Nano 7th GeniPad 3
    Both Parallels and VMWare Fusion have trials (14-day I believe) that you can download and try it out for yourself.

    I opted just to stick with VirtualBox which works fine for my occasional need to run Linux on my iMac..

    Regards

  8. #8


    Member Since
    Apr 01, 2010
    Posts
    102
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro on OS X Mavericks
    Quote Originally Posted by cjcoops View Post
    I tried out VMware - was very good, but just stuck with Bootcamp.

    Have since installed Virtual box, freeware virtualisation from Sun - and it's excellent, and free.
    So, well 'worth' trying out first - seriously, very impressive.

    Coops
    So, I am trying to get things going with VirtualBox, only I am at the step where it asks me to "Create new hard disk" or "Use existing hard disk." I have already partitioned my drive with Boot Camp. If I click "Create new hard disk," is it going to partition another drive, or will it let me use Boot Camp by clicking the "Use existing hard disk?" Or is this option having nothing to do with partitioning at all and I am just panicking?

    I don't want to mess up my precious MacBook, so please forgive me if this is a stupid question. I'd rather ask a stupid question than f*** up my prized possession.

    Thanks!
    - Currently using a MacBook Pro running OS X Mavericks
    - syncs with iPhone 5S, iPod Touch, and iPad Mini

  9. #9

    XJ-linux's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 02, 2007
    Location
    Going Galt...
    Posts
    3,449
    Specs:
    MacBookAir5,2:10.9.5-MacMini3,1:10.9.5-iPhone6,1:8.4.1
    I don't believe VB allows you to use your Bootcamp partition for your VM disk. I could be wrong though. VB doesn't partition your disk. VMs run off a disk image which is basically a big file. Your disk doesn't get chopped up into discrete bootable sectors.
    Never judge a man, untill you have walked a mile in his shoes...
    That way you'll be a mile away from him, and you'll have his shoes.

  10. #10


    Member Since
    Apr 01, 2010
    Posts
    102
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro on OS X Mavericks
    I have now downloaded and installed VirtualBox and am running Windows virtually, FOR FREE. Yay!! Thanks for all your help!
    - Currently using a MacBook Pro running OS X Mavericks
    - syncs with iPhone 5S, iPod Touch, and iPad Mini

  11. #11

    chscag's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 23, 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    48,269
    Specs:
    Late 2013 27" iMac, iPad 3, iPhone 6s+, iPhone 6+, 3 iPods, El Capitan
    For most Windows apps and as long as you don't need to use your BC partition as a VM, VirtualBox works well enough.

    BTW, VMWare Fusion has a special going on right now. You pay only $9.99 for the latest version, however, you must have either a previous version of Fusion or Parallels to be eligible for the purchase.

  12. #12

    hugtheslug's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    529
    Specs:
    2008 Unibody MacBook / 2009 White MacBook / iMac C2D 2.16 GHz 20" / iMac G5 1.6 GHz 17"
    Quote Originally Posted by chscag View Post
    BTW, VMWare Fusion has a special going on right now. You pay only $9.99 for the latest version, however, you must have either a previous version of Fusion or Parallels to be eligible for the purchase.
    Superb, bought and downloaded as soon as I read this. Thanks !

    Cheers

    Hugh
    A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
    Warning - this user has only a little knowledge

  13. #13

    TattooedMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 19, 2009
    Location
    Waiting for a mate . . .
    Posts
    8,437
    Specs:
    21" iMac 2.9Ghz 16GB RAM - 10.11.3, iPhone6s & iPad Air 2 - iOS 9.2.1, ATV 4Th Gen tvOS, ATV3
    Quote Originally Posted by chscag View Post
    BTW, VMWare Fusion has a special going on right now. You pay only $9.99 for the latest version, however, you must have either a previous version of Fusion or Parallels to be eligible for the purchase.
    Thanks for that Charlie .... But im a bit weirded out by it all, bc as i was reading the words "$9.99 for latest version" i received a email informing me of just this.....
    Ill be buying it now just bc of this lol OMEN ?? or not ??
    Dont forget to use the Reputation System if someone has helped you out !!!
    Arguing with a zealot is only slightly easier than tunneling through a mountain with your forehead!!!!!
    MoTM ☆☆☆

  14. #14

    chscag's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 23, 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    48,269
    Specs:
    Late 2013 27" iMac, iPad 3, iPhone 6s+, iPhone 6+, 3 iPods, El Capitan
    Buy it. No evil omens that I know of. Besides, you can probably find an out of work Witch Doctor down there who will do an exorcism for you.

  15. #15

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    I actually switched about a year ago from Parallels to Fusion. As others have stated, they perform about the same, but the big difference to me is in support and the other soft benefits.

    Parallels support, really, is subpar at best. VMWare has a much more robust support structure, not to mention they're a huge company supporting the virtualization needs of corporations as well as Fusion which makes me feel more secure about their long-term future.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr facebook twitter tumblr google+ about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. VMware Fusion or Parallels Desktop for Mac
    By velvetsan in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-27-2011, 04:20 PM
  2. VMware Fusion 3 or Parallels Desktop 5.0 for Mac
    By aviator0402 in forum OS X - Apps and Games
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-02-2010, 10:19 AM
  3. Parallels Desktop Vs VMware Fusion
    By bonvoyage in forum OS X - Apps and Games
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-04-2009, 03:13 PM
  4. Parallels Desktop 4.0 for Mac VS VMware fusion
    By hotskate in forum OS X - Apps and Games
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-16-2009, 10:04 AM
  5. VMware Fusion vs Parallels Desktop for Mac?
    By smurfy in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-12-2007, 01:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •