New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Movies and Video For people making movies and editing video with their Mac.

Please Help. Is a Canon T3i Rebel Capable of Doing this?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
MacNewbie

 
Member Since: Dec 06, 2006
Posts: 409
MacNewbie is an unknown at this point

MacNewbie is offline
not sure why my previous thread was deleted but anyway

anybody have a guess as to what kind of camera/lens can produce a video like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YozLTf5J0M&

canon t3i rebel maybe?

someone else told me they think its a canon 7d due to the "depth of field" however isnt the canon t3i also capable of this depth of field?

for example this guy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IFj...k&feature=plcp says he uses a canon t3i rebel, and other than the poor lighting and the unblurred background the video quality looks relatively comparable to the first link i posted?
QUOTE Thanks
Doug b

 
Doug b's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 22, 2008
Location: Forest Hills, NYC
Posts: 3,344
Doug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15-inch Early 2008; Processor 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo; Memory 4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 10.7.5

Doug b is offline
There is absolutely zero special about this video or the way it is rendered. Neither the 7D or t3i are FX sensor cameras, and so you shouldn't be comparing them in this way. The ONLY difference you'll be able to measure is one that is produced by the lenses you put on either of them.

You want nice out of focus backgrounds? Get a nice tele lens like an 85 1.4 or 105 2.8 etc. That's all you'll need. A 75-200 2.8 will also do but is overkill.

Doug
QUOTE Thanks
bobtomay

 
bobtomay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 22, 2006
Location: Texas, where else?
Posts: 25,192
bobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.33 C2D 256 4GB, MBA 13" i7 1.8, MB 2.0 2GB, Nano 4th, 3GS, iPad 1

bobtomay is offline
That's what I thought, but since I'm no camera guy, figured I leave it to you photogs.

Of course, if the op is just looking for a reason to lay out the cash for the t3i...

Do it man, you'll like it.

I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.
QUOTE Thanks
MacNewbie

 
Member Since: Dec 06, 2006
Posts: 409
MacNewbie is an unknown at this point

MacNewbie is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug b View Post
There is absolutely zero special about this video or the way it is rendered. Neither the 7D or t3i are FX sensor cameras, and so you shouldn't be comparing them in this way. The ONLY difference you'll be able to measure is one that is produced by the lenses you put on either of them.

You want nice out of focus backgrounds? Get a nice tele lens like an 85 1.4 or 105 2.8 etc. That's all you'll need. A 75-200 2.8 will also do but is overkill.

Doug

how about a 18-55 mm lens? im also not sure what you mean by "there is zero special about this video" i didnt say anything about it is special i just feel like it is a relatively good quality vlogging type of video and i want to know what type of camera you guys think the guys used.

didnt really answer my question?

to other camera pros reading

on amazon the body alone sells for 600 whereas the body+18-55mm lens is 650.

if im primarily going to be using this cam for vlogging should i just buy the body alone with something like a 1.4-2 lens?
QUOTE Thanks
CrimsonRequiem

 
CrimsonRequiem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 6,006
CrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to all
Mac Specs: MBP 2.3 Ghz 4GB RAM 860 GB SSD, iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 32GB RAM, Fusion Drive 1TB

CrimsonRequiem is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacNewbie View Post
how about a 18-55 mm lens? im also not sure what you mean by "there is zero special about this video" i didnt say anything about it is special i just feel like it is a relatively good quality vlogging type of video and i want to know what type of camera you guys think the guys used.

didnt really answer my question?

to other camera pros reading

on amazon the body alone sells for 600 whereas the body+18-55mm lens is 650.

if im primarily going to be using this cam for vlogging should i just buy the body alone with something like a 1.4-2 lens?
Doug actually did answer your question. You need a lens with a long focal length and or a large aperture of 1.2-2.8.

死神はリンゴしか食べない。
QUOTE Thanks
MacNewbie

 
Member Since: Dec 06, 2006
Posts: 409
MacNewbie is an unknown at this point

MacNewbie is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrimsonRequiem View Post
Doug actually did answer your question. You need a lens with a long focal length and or a large aperture of 1.2-2.8.
the amazon bundle i purchased comes with a 18-55mm lens which is 50 bucks more than the body alone

should i have just bought the body alone and another lens (Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens Amazon.com: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens: CANON: Camera & Photo)
if i am trying to replicate the results of the first video i posted?
QUOTE Thanks
CrimsonRequiem

 
CrimsonRequiem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 6,006
CrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to all
Mac Specs: MBP 2.3 Ghz 4GB RAM 860 GB SSD, iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 32GB RAM, Fusion Drive 1TB

CrimsonRequiem is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacNewbie View Post
the amazon bundle i purchased comes with a 18-55mm lens which is 50 bucks more than the body alone

should i have just bought the body alone and another lens (Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens Amazon.com: Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens: CANON: Camera & Photo)
if i am trying to replicate the results of the first video i posted?
You could always send Jack a message and ask him? If you really want to replicate the results.

I don't think you are going to get the same results with a 50mm. You need something a little longer like an 85 or 100mm like Doug suggested.

A 70-200mm will pretty much make it really simple but those are pretty expensive. I just ordered a 70-200mm F/2.8 L II today 2K+ for that glass.

死神はリンゴしか食べない。
QUOTE Thanks
Doug b

 
Doug b's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 22, 2008
Location: Forest Hills, NYC
Posts: 3,344
Doug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond reputeDoug b has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15-inch Early 2008; Processor 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo; Memory 4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM; 10.7.5

Doug b is offline
I said it's nothing special because it's not. I don't see the "depth of field" being all that great, either. It kind of looks like they're using a 50mm lens, but I could be wrong. You have to understand the relation between the distance from the subject and the throw of the focal length on the lens.

Again, the camera body does NOT MATTER. It's all in the lenses where you'll get the DOF you're looking for. You want subject isolation and blurred backgrounds? You'll need a long focal length. A zoom is fine, but you'll be standing further back. So take note of the space you'll be working in. Lots of things come in to play here, so do some research on a dedicated film/lens/camera forum.

A very good place to start is POTN. It's primarily a Canon forum, but some great people reside there, and are always willing to help.

Doug

Edit: BTW, the 18-55 MIGHT be fine, but the problem is that when you zoom out to the long end, you're aperture will increase to something like f5.6 or similar and you'll likely already be starting at something like f3.5. Problem there is that these apertures don't lend themselves to specific subject isolation.
QUOTE Thanks
casper69

 
Member Since: Oct 07, 2009
Location: London England
Posts: 101
casper69 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 17in GS Macbook Pro 3.06ghz, 4gb ram, 500 hdd 7200 rpm,9400m and gt graphics

casper69 is offline
Hey MacNewbie,

I'm in a similar boat to you as needing a DSLR for filming (in addition to my camcorder) as above its all about the lens, the way its shot like lighting etc, after editing and the way your filming i.e. autofocus use or not.

The Canon your looking at is great for video as well and can easily go straight onto the mac but if your needing the autofocus to help you while filming, i have to say its slow and you can hear the lens moving so you need an external mic. (i found this the same with Nikon to)

For me i'm going down the Sony Alpha A57 or A65 (due to budget) as the autofocus is extremely quick due to the translucent mirror it uses plus very very little to no lens noise meaning no need for external mic and the video quality and photo is great, the only issue but not anything bad is the video file is AVCHD meaning you need to convert the file before putting it in FCP etc but if you change the video settings to MP4 then it works fine (the filming is slightly different but i don't see it especially after editing and put on dvd)


what i done before looking at buying was test a number of cameras in the same range take photos and film on my memory card so i can take home to edit and see the quality for my self after i done what i'm looking to do, i would suggest doing this so you get an idea of how the camera shoots and if it ticks your boxes.

also on youtube look at the video people have made with these cameras and ask what lens and after editing they use.

hope this helps

It's on like Donkey Kong

http://www.youtube.com/user/caspervision
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« iMovie 09 not responding | Poor video from Elgato video capture »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?