03-25-2008, 09:34 AM #1
Most platform independent format?
- Member Since
- Sep 01, 2007
I am all new to the whole video exporting stuff and such.
To make things short: I got a movie I want to export into a format so that EVERYONE regardless of what platform he is using, can view it without any problems.
I bought QT Pro, just so you know
I've encountered the following problems:
avi videos - Bad quality, big pixels = ugly
mov videos - wonderful quality, little file size BUT: does not run on any platform, pc noobs like mom and dad wouldn't know what to do!
mp4 videos (h.264 codec): no video / garbled video in Windows Media Player audio works; in VLC Player it looks greyish, distorted.
So what else would be left then?!
Which format would work "out of the box!?"
And why does it not just WORK on winblows pcs?
Well, the last question was more a rethoric question...
Thanks in advance for any help!
03-25-2008, 05:18 PM #2
- Member Since
- Jan 13, 2006
- Upstate California
- '09 8-core MacPro | '12 MBA | iPad 2 16GB | iPhone 5C 16GB
Regular mpeg format (.mpg - I think it might be officially called Mpeg-2, not 100% sure on that though.) has always worked the best for me. I've viewed .mpg videos on both my Dell and all of my Macs no problem.
It's worth a shot anyway, there aren't many other formats to choose from that I'm aware of. That's funny that the .avi's are bad quality, I've viewed several that were DVD quality... maybe it's their compression.
Anyway, check out the .mpg format and see if that works for you.
03-25-2008, 07:20 PM #3
the quality of .avi s depends on their compression, also depends if its divx avi it should be top quality.
however, i do not prefer the .avi format, not sure why...
if i were u i would use .mpeg/.mpg format, it works on both windows and mac (i'm pretty sure).
But the best thing would probably be flash, i kno most people think that flash video sucks, but it all depends on the quality setting, 98% of computers have flash, and its easy to distribute. trust me do some research on flash video.
if the setting is high quality it will look ten times better than youtube, almost dvd quality. but for flash you do need Flash from adobe
03-25-2008, 07:51 PM #4
- Member Since
- Jun 25, 2005
- On the road
- 2011 MBP, i7, 16GB RAM, MBP 2.16Ghz Core Duo, 2GB ram, Dual 867Mhz MDD, 1.75GB ram, ATI 9800 Pro vid
Flash does seem to be officially supported on Mac, MS Windows and Linux, so at least that is a big positive. Apple and Microsoft ignore Linux, so you'd have to rely on some third party that may not be as reliable.
If one wants to distribute beyond Mac and MS Windows, then Flash seems like a reasonable solution along with mpeg video. One problem might be that QuickTime on OS X does not support mpeg 2 without an add on. This complicates matters for mom & dad.
Since my video is meant for family and friends, I've taken the stance that I'll only produce QuickTime .mov files and now only H.264. My intended audience has either OS X or MS Windows access, so I have no reason to cater to other platforms. Flavian, consider who your intended audience is and live within that parameter.CameraTime - Time lapse photography for novice and advanced users.
When asking questions, post the version of your software. You'll receive better answers.
Please post your results to the thread as it is good feedback.
03-29-2008, 02:02 PM #5
i forgot to mention that flash DOES cost a fortune, along with all other adobe products
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By timcott in forum Internet, Networking, and WirelessReplies: 0Last Post: 07-26-2010, 07:18 PM
By MacSnack in forum iOS and AppsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-16-2009, 02:52 PM
By sgort2 in forum Schweb's LoungeReplies: 2Last Post: 07-09-2008, 09:51 PM
By telmit1 in forum Apple DesktopsReplies: 9Last Post: 07-01-2007, 07:50 PM