| iPod Hardware and Accessories All iPod hardware discussions. |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Dec 04, 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
![]() ![]() |
Hey all,
Okay my shuffle has kicked the bucket, won't mount but still plays, it's just over a year old so time for an upgrade. I used the shuffle almost everyday, firstly during my pre-dawn cycling ride, then on my commute. Sometimes I use it to transfer files from work to home and back again, so it's used for music/podcasts and data. I don't think I want another shuffle after this one died so I'm looking at a Nano. Considering they're flash-based as well will it last longer or almost the same amount of time? How do people feel about the build quality? I'm also thinking of the video ipod mostly because for a couple of hundred bucks more you get 30gig, vids, photos etc. Is it tough enough to use during my workouts? So which one? Please help me choose. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Aug 27, 2005
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 2,410
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 15" Powerbook G4 • 24" iMac • iPhone 3Gs
|
Well, firstly, (I'm cheap) I would try to reformat the iPod Shuffle with Disk Utility. I thought my Mini was fried, but I ran Disk Utility, reset it, ran the firmware update, and I was up and running again.
If that doesn't work I'd go for the iPod Nano. I have friends with both and the iPod is a lot bigger than the Nano. That's just what I'd do though. I try to Command+Shift+/ when I can. They're - Their - There | Two - Too - To | You're - Your | MAC - Mac I was on the M-F honor roll for October, 2006.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 17, 2006
Posts: 688
![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac 17" Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 512 MB Ram 128 vRAM 60GB HD
|
hmm...
Well it depends. If you've been fine the past year with the shuffle, then get the nano. It's smaller, and the flash-based drive is definately a plus. The 30 Gig is only necessary if you'd be taking long road trips. Personally, I have a 60 GB b/c my iTunes library is HUGE! (my U2 alone is something like 13 gigs...) So in the end: go for the nano. the back of our computer looks better than the front of theirs Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Dec 04, 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 696
![]() ![]() |
thanks |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Sep 18, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 89
![]() |
I just bought a video 30gig
Had a heart attack from the price but i really like it over the nano. Holds so much more and videos if your really bored. but the price is a little crazy. :spook: :spook: :spook: :spook: :spook: |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I just bought myself a 4gb nano, cos I don't like carrying bulk around (like I did with my 20Gb) and I am almost always armed with my laptop, so why watch vids on a small screen? Just made sense to me to go with a small compact piece. Then again, I only have 600-700 songs, and listen to only maybe 200 of them.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Apr 03, 2006
Posts: 202
![]() Mac Specs: iMac Intel Core Duo 17" A Little Piece Of Heaven
|
Well, the Nano will certainly be more ergonomic for working out in the Gym, but if you have the library of music and the will to dig out the big bucks for the video, than the video will be worth the money.
It's all good. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Apr 03, 2006
Posts: 202
![]() Mac Specs: iMac Intel Core Duo 17" A Little Piece Of Heaven
|
It's all good. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| iPod DeskTop Issuie... If any. iPod Icons on DeskTop (ICONs) on Mac. | TTheInfamous1 | iPod Hardware and Accessories | 3 | 03-22-2006 01:57 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.
Powered by vBulletin