Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1

    Benjamindaines's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 08, 2005
    Location
    A religiously oppressed state
    Posts
    2,789
    Specs:
    17" MacBook Pro
    Omg Never Thought Id See The Day
    Look at whats on the screen on this ipod nano http://applexnet.com/images/ipodnano/ipn5.jpg

  2. #2

    D3v1L80Y's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    12,456
    Specs:
    MacBook
    Well, the Nanos are pretty much just USB flash drives....more or less.
    :black:
    __________________________________________________
    Posting and YOU|Forum Community Guidelines|The Apple Product Cycle|Forum Courtesy

    mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric
    MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control
    Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc.


  3. #3

    sarahsboy18's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 30, 2005
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    1,069
    Specs:
    Mac Pro, 8-Core 2.8Ghz, 10GB RAM, 2x1TB HDDs, iPod U2 Edition
    Quote Originally Posted by D3v1L80Y
    Well, the Nanos are pretty much just USB flash drives....more or less.
    :black:
    USB 2.0 is technically just as fast as FW anyhow... So I don't see the harm..

    Edit: I did a little hunting and it looks like standard speed on 2.0 is actually just 12Mbps... Am I reading this right?
    "If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." -Mitch Hedberg

  4. #4

    Benjamindaines's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 08, 2005
    Location
    A religiously oppressed state
    Posts
    2,789
    Specs:
    17" MacBook Pro
    Quote Originally Posted by sarahsboy18
    USB 2.0 is technically just as fast as FW anyhow... So I don't see the harm.
    but realistically it isnt

  5. #5

    macAttack's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 23, 2005
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Posts
    1,509
    Specs:
    iBook
    especially not firewire 800

  6. #6


    Member Since
    May 24, 2004
    Posts
    23
    Specs:
    Ibook G4 1.33 ! 60 gig/external 250gig.
    i read somewhere that usb2.0 is faster than firewire, but usb 2.0 doesn't transfer at a constant rate like firewire. Therefore firewire would probably be faster during a larger transfer. Correct me if i'm wrong.

  7. #7

    D3v1L80Y's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2004
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    12,456
    Specs:
    MacBook
    Quote Originally Posted by sarahsboy18
    USB 2.0 is technically just as fast as FW anyhow... So I don't see the harm..

    Edit: I did a little hunting and it looks like standard speed on 2.0 is actually just 12Mbps... Am I reading this right?
    USB 2.0 can have speeds up to 480Mbps...but it is not a constant transfer speed...it happens in bursts here and there. It can go as low as 12Mbps.

    FireWire is a constant 400Mbps transfer speed.
    __________________________________________________
    Posting and YOU|Forum Community Guidelines|The Apple Product Cycle|Forum Courtesy

    mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric
    MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control
    Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc.


  8. #8
    Kokopelli
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by sarahsboy18
    USB 2.0 is technically just as fast as FW anyhow... So I don't see the harm..

    Edit: I did a little hunting and it looks like standard speed on 2.0 is actually just 12Mbps... Am I reading this right?
    No, USB theoretical through put is 12 Mbps, USB 2.0 has a theoretical throughput of 480 Mbps. I say theoretical because neither will ever achieve this in reality.

    Firewire has a theoretical throughput of only 400 Mbps but is still faster than USB 2.0 for sustained file transfers.

    I am sort of amazed, but then to shove everything into such a small shell I guess Apple had to make some hard choices.

  9. #9

    PowerBookG4's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 08, 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,188
    Specs:
    Mac Pro 8x3.0ghz 12gb ram 8800GT , MBP 2.16 2GB Ram 17 inch.
    Quote Originally Posted by discombobulated
    i read somewhere that usb2.0 is faster than firewire, but usb 2.0 doesn't transfer at a constant rate like firewire. Therefore firewire would probably be faster during a larger transfer. Correct me if i'm wrong.
    no need to correct you, this is correct, the firewire is faster for a large file transfer, but USB 2.0 is faster for smaller file trasnfers such as 1 song or 10 songs, but not faster when it is 100 songs or 10000 songs.
    My Website
    Blog
    I love my hosting company!
    I was on the M-F honor roll for Febuary:2006

  10. #10


    Member Since
    Mar 30, 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,744
    Specs:
    12" Apple PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz)
    More importantly, many older Macs have FireWire but not USB2. So Apple is, effectively, forcing those users to transfer songs at USB1.1 speeds...about 35 times slower. (Same applies to the iPod Shuffle, for that matter.)

    Even for those of us with USB2 Macs, FireWire is almost always faster in the real world, even for the little things. The only thing USB2 has going for it is a lower cost to implement.

  11. #11

    inflexion's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 12, 2005
    Location
    /home/sheffield/UK
    Posts
    1,278
    Specs:
    12" 1Ghz PB 768Mb 10.4.5 30Gb Video iPod 40Gb 3G iPod 1Gb iPod Shuffle
    great as i have a older PB looks like i cant really get a nano

    4Gb at 11MBps anyone????

  12. #12

    dtravis7's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2005
    Location
    Modesto, Ca.
    Posts
    28,981
    Specs:
    iMac 2010 27" QuadI7 OSX10.11, iMac 2008 OSX10.11, MBP Late2011OSX10.11 , iPad Air, iPhone 3GS
    Quote Originally Posted by inflexion
    great as i have a older PB looks like i cant really get a nano

    4Gb at 11MBps anyone????
    Does your older PB have a PCMCIA slot? If so you could get a USB 2.0 card. If not then it would be S L O W!

    I am sort of sad there is no Firewire chip in the Nano. I know with the small size they had to leave a few things out, but for users of older Macs it's going to be a pain. I bet with Firewire and the Flash Ram it would fly! Oh well. It's a nice unit for sure. I hope Apple in the future does not totally eliminate Firewire since for external drives and video cams it's much better and faster.

  13. #13

    brendan67's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 24, 2005
    Posts
    700
    Specs:
    MacbookAir iPhone6
    firewire
    Quote Originally Posted by inflexion
    great as i have a older PB looks like i cant really get a nano

    4Gb at 11MBps anyone????

    hi
    seems odd apple nano having no firewire
    goes against the grain somewhat
    regards
    MacbookAir
    iPhone6
    iPadAir

  14. #14

    stillimation's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 25, 2004
    Posts
    182
    does any one think that that could just be older and they fixed it to where it is FW, i dont think that MR. Jobs would do that to us

  15. #15


    Member Since
    Jun 30, 2005
    Posts
    97
    On the Apple Canada site the usb cord is listed as an accessory but not a fw cord...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Day-Day Handeling/Care
    By engrwpride in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-20-2008, 12:54 AM
  2. omg omg i have totally screwed up
    By davidmassey2006 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-12-2008, 02:23 PM
  3. Thought for the Day...
    By mac57 in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 06-04-2007, 06:46 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-05-2006, 04:58 PM
  5. Recommend Program for managing day to day finances?
    By iRock in forum OS X - Apps and Games
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-26-2005, 06:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •