New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
iPhone Hardware and Accessories Discuss iPhone hardware

Cisco owns trademark for iPhone


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
nunee

 
Member Since: Jan 08, 2007
Posts: 28
nunee will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: iPod 8GB Nano

nunee is offline
Report from the San Jose Mercury News - Full story here: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercu...l/16425178.htm


IPhone has been the rumored name for Apple's cell phone effort for years. The company reportedly registered the iPhone.org domain name in 1999. But Cisco acquired a company that has owned the U.S. trademark since 1999.


THIS could be interesting, especially after Apple's tangle with Creative.
QUOTE Thanks
Murlyn

 
Murlyn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 11, 2003
Location: Mount Vernon, WA
Posts: 4,909
Murlyn is a name known to allMurlyn is a name known to allMurlyn is a name known to allMurlyn is a name known to allMurlyn is a name known to allMurlyn is a name known to allMurlyn is a name known to all
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 2.6 GHz Core 2 Duo 4GB RAM OS 10.5.2

Murlyn is offline
Yeah I was wondering what was going to come from this.. I guess we'll see.
QUOTE Thanks
alexmaccoll

 
Member Since: Jan 27, 2005
Location: Maidenhead, UK
Posts: 423
alexmaccoll is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 20" intel iMac, 15" MBP, 3 X 13.3" MB (family etc), G4 tower, 12" G4 PowerBook, iBook G4, 20" iMacG5

alexmaccoll is offline
Quote:
Cisco is suing Apple Computer for trademark infringement in a federal court, for using the iPhone name.
More to come....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6250511.stm


Thanks
Alex
QUOTE Thanks
PowerBookG4

 
PowerBookG4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 08, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,190
PowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 8x3.0ghz 12gb ram 8800GT , MBP 2.16 2GB Ram 17 inch.

PowerBookG4 is offline
intersting read... they will settle but I think apples stock will take a hit of a few dollars tomorrow when the investors hear about it, I think the stock will rebound though by the next day.

My Website
Blog
I love my hosting company!
I was on the M-F honor roll for Febuary:2006
QUOTE Thanks
mraya

 
mraya's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 27, 2005
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 942
mraya is a jewel in the roughmraya is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: MacBook C2D 2.4 2GB

mraya is offline
I see 2 options here...

- Apple buys/gets permission from Cisco to use the name.
- On the they of the iPhone's release it will recieve a new name, probably Apple Phone, just like the iTV, i mean Apple TV.

[is pointless to click here]
QUOTE Thanks
Starky

 
Starky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 08, 2006
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 111
Starky is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Macbook: 2.00Ghz C2D, 2GB RAM, 120GB HD

Starky is offline
To be honest I feel that this is very pathetic on Cisco's part. They say that they are wanting to protect their own trademark when the name is an obvious copy of apple's main franchises.

It's like the people who buy domains like www.ps3.org and things as soon as the ps3 is announced simply so they can sell them on to people who actually want to make sites.

Although they do have a product it's a pretty crap one which doesn't really deserve the name.
QUOTE Thanks
dan828

 
dan828's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 12, 2005
Location: Ceres, Ca
Posts: 670
dan828 is a jewel in the roughdan828 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iPad 32 GB 3G

dan828 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starky View Post
To be honest I feel that this is very pathetic on Cisco's part. They say that they are wanting to protect their own trademark when the name is an obvious copy of apple's main franchises.

It's like the people who buy domains like www.ps3.org and things as soon as the ps3 is announced simply so they can sell them on to people who actually want to make sites.

Although they do have a product it's a pretty crap one which doesn't really deserve the name.
The trademark dates back to before Apple began using the iName branding, and that practice, puting a lower case i or e befor a product name is hardly an Apple invention. It seems that Apple users can be somewhat insular in this reguard, not knowing much about the industry as a whole, and then end up thinking Apple is being copied by companies that had products and names out prior to Apple making use of something similar. Just because Apple has two succesful products using a certain naming scheme that they didn't originate doesn't mean that they are entitled to any other similar name now.

Cisco is a large, well established company that is worth many times over what Apple is, so they hardly need to resort to any backhanded tacticts to earn a little extra cash. The truth is Apple had asked for the trademark and was in talks with Cisco for a license when they just decided they'd use it anyway, claiming that they were different products and wouldn't compete directly. Now Apple has had good luck bullying companies in this fashion before, but I seriously doubt that Cisco will roll over and take it. First of all, Apple has much more to lose here than Cisco, and already Cisco can claim damages for dilution of trademark due to Apple's actions-- first negotiating in bad faith and then making a major announcment when they had obviously agreed that Cisco owned the trademark (implicitly, you wouldn't be in talks to buy the rights if you didn't think that they owned the trademark, would you?) And since Cisco (Linksys branded), already has an iPhone product on the market, they are obviously using the trademark, aren't they?

In partiular, I see a real problem due to one simple fact. The iPhone (Apple) can run dashboard widgets, and there is a Skype widget available. Couple that with the built in 802.11x and you've got Skype phone functionality, which is what the iPhone (Cisco) is-- a Skype phone. Apple is competing directly with Cisco, using a trademark that they don't have rights to, but Cisco does, and has had rights to since before the iPod was ever invented. Do you think that's going to fly in court?
QUOTE Thanks
Starky

 
Starky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 08, 2006
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 111
Starky is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Macbook: 2.00Ghz C2D, 2GB RAM, 120GB HD

Starky is offline
I did a bit of research into the iPhone. it was origonally released in 1997 and was never a popular product.

The trademark was never used again until 2006

How popular were iPods in 2006? Very. It's quite obvious that this is the only reason they resurrected the trademark.
QUOTE Thanks
scooter

 
scooter's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 12, 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 539
scooter has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: Macbook Pro 2.6 GHz, 4 GB, 200 GB, 256MB Vid

scooter is offline
here is my own bit of research:

Quote:
The USPTO record shows that Infogear Technology Corporation originally applied for the trademark on March 20, 1996. The mark was "published for opposition" on December 29, 1998 and officially recorded (registered) as a trademark on November 16, 1999. The "last listed owner" of the mark is listed as "Cisco Technology, Inc."
for those of the i-whatever persuasion:

Quote:
Ipod-- Introduced in 2001.
Imac-- Introduced in 1998

Iphone trademark-- 1996
now i get lost when trying to understand the actual law of trademark names, and i just get confused and have to lie down for a while. i will leave it to the trade lawyers and courts to figure out who is right.
for now, my money is not on apple..............

From a G4 400MHz to an Intel Mac Mini to iMac Core Duo to a Macbook Pro 2.6GHz.............gotta love Apple!
QUOTE Thanks
dan828

 
dan828's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 12, 2005
Location: Ceres, Ca
Posts: 670
dan828 is a jewel in the roughdan828 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iPad 32 GB 3G

dan828 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starky View Post
I did a bit of research into the iPhone. it was origonally released in 1997 and was never a popular product.

The trademark was never used again until 2006

How popular were iPods in 2006? Very. It's quite obvious that this is the only reason they resurrected the trademark.
So it's obvious, so what? That doesn't entitle Apple to every name that starts with a lowercase i.
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
Read THIS.

Little is ever as it seems. Now we know why Steve went ahead.


QUOTE Thanks
rman

 
rman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 24, 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 12,591
rman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud ofrman has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 2 x 3.0GHz Quad-Core, 6GB OS X 10.6.8 | 15in MacBook Pro 2.2GHz OS X 10.6.8 | 64GB iPad 2 WiFi

rman is offline
Interesting read.

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass, It's about learning to dance in the rain!
QUOTE Thanks
SpindleX

 
SpindleX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 04, 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 80
SpindleX is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: iMac Alum 20'' 2.4GHz | iMac G4 | iPod Silver Nano 2GB

SpindleX is offline
Yeah, would't worry about Apple, I'm sure they have every loop hole clearly thought out. Also, to whomever said this "Cisco is a large, well established company that is worth many times over what Apple is" quite a bold statement to make considering the market share these days eh?
QUOTE Thanks
dan828

 
dan828's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 12, 2005
Location: Ceres, Ca
Posts: 670
dan828 is a jewel in the roughdan828 is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iPad 32 GB 3G

dan828 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpindleX View Post
Also, to whomever said this "Cisco is a large, well established company that is worth many times over what Apple is" quite a bold statement to make considering the market share these days eh?
Not really. Cisco is the richest company in Silcon Valley. They sell vastly different products then Apple, obviously. Cisco's market cap is ~ $175 billion, while Apple's is ~ $81 billion, market cap being defined as what a company is worth. So Cisco is worth more than double of what Apple is. Maybe not quite "many times over," but Cisco is a bigger company than Apple. I was just pointing that out because of the people suggesting that Cisco was just some little company trying to grab a little money in the sue fest that is the American corporate business scene these days. And frankly, since Apple is one of the most sue happy big corporations around, I don't see how people have room to complain.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Why i don't want to buy the iPhone | Woohoo I've been chosen for a free iPhone - yeah right! »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Any Cisco people here? (console to Cisco Devices) petenet OS X - Apps and Games 1 10-12-2006 08:33 PM
Powerbook and Cisco Equipment Darth_Sandwich Apple Notebooks 4 07-07-2005 12:41 PM
Cisco VPN client for mac with Zone Agent?? Help! edokid Switcher Hangout 5 03-05-2005 09:57 AM
TIBCO sues Apple over trademark infringement Murlyn Apple Rumors and Reports 0 08-28-2003 04:41 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?