Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37
  1. #1

    Tfparrott's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 25, 2011
    Posts
    11
    iPad2 vs. Kindle Fire
    I'm going to buy a tablet for my wife for Christmas. She has an iPhone. Her desktop and laptop are both PC.

    I was just reading about the new Kindle Fire. $199.00 is a pretty good price point compared to $499.00 for the iPad.

    I'd like to hear from my fellow Mac-Forum members on the pros and cons of both.

  2. #2

    Raz0rEdge's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 17, 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    8,808
    Specs:
    27" i7 iMac, 24" iMac, 13" Macbook Air, iPhone 6S, iPod Nano 7th GeniPad 3
    You are not in the right forum..you should be in the iPad or Other hardware forum..

    Either way..the Kindle Fire is getting pretty good reviews from most people..depending on what your wife would want to do with a tablet, the Fire might be a good fit or not..
    --
    Regards
    ...Ashwin



    Be sure to read the Community Guidelines | The more information you provide, the better answers you get, remember GIGO.

  3. #3


    Member Since
    Feb 25, 2009
    Posts
    2,112
    Specs:
    Late 2013 rMBP, i7, 750m gpu, OSX versions 10.9.3, 10.10
    This really doesn't fit under Apple Rumors and Reports - but it will be impossible to truly compare the two until the Amazon device is actually released. Aside from generic information (like it has a dual core processor, but which one and what speed?) - we don't know if it offers Googles Android Market or if it's only Amazon's market (right now from the way it describes on amazons page, I'd hazard to guess amazons market). We don't know if it's a capacitive display or resistive (I would hope capacitive).

    We know there is no 3g.
    We know there is no camera.
    It has 8gig of storage (which to me is really not a lot, I use at a min 24Gig of my 64Gig iPad), but appears to have no MicroSD slot for additional storage?
    We know the device is geared toward cloud storage, and although can dock to a pc can it be backed up to that pc? (we don't know)

    Basically, a full comparison of useability and quality won't be able to occur until the device is released. Right now the only thing people can do is speculate.
    My Macs: Late 2013 rMBP w/ 750m, 16Gig ram; 2013 Mac Pro 6 core w/ D700, 16Gig Ram; Mac mini G4, 1.25 GHz, 512m ram (server); Late 2011 11" MBA, 1.8GHz i7, 4Gig Ram, 256Gig SSD, HD3000; Powerbook 12" G4 1.33GHz running Linux; Apple TV (1080p version)

  4. #4

    iWhat's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 11, 2004
    Location
    Toledo, Ohio
    Posts
    5,736
    Specs:
    Macbook, iMac G5, iPad, iPhone 4, iPod (MANY)!
    Yep, just make sure you're are aware of the forum you are posting in and you'll be fine. It makes things a lot more easy for the moderators.

  5. #5

    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,782
    Specs:
    2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
    The two tablets are worlds apart. One is a high end tablet and one is a low end (I hate using that phrase) tablet with fewer features but a lower price point. The Fire is focused on content (media and textual) while the iPad is much better at doing non-media related tasks. I'd suggest you wait until people start getting their hands on the Fire and post some reviews.

    You need to ask yourself what her main use will be. Answer that and the choice should become much more clear. As an aside, if she already has an iPhone, notebook and a desktop, why get her a tablet?
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  6. #6

    Tfparrott's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 25, 2011
    Posts
    11
    My bad. I have requested to have this thread moved to the correct forum.

    She actually only talked about getting a Kindle as a reader. However, I'm looking at ALL of the options.

  7. #7

    RavingMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 07, 2008
    Location
    In Denial
    Posts
    7,950
    Specs:
    4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G
    As an eReader it looks like it could be a good option. I have the iPad2 (and iPad1 before that); if you are doing a tablet to tablet comparison, I still think (based on the little we know) that the iPad is a better solution.

    But, if all she wants is a Kindle I think it is probably a good choice. FWIW I have thought about buying a Kindle myself, in addition to my iPad, but I can't get past the visually disturbing (at least to me) page transitions on the old style Kindle.
    I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .

  8. #8

    vansmith's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 19, 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    19,782
    Specs:
    2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
    I've heard that, for the purposes of reading, nothing beats the Kindle (the non-Fire variety). The tech used in the screen makes for a very pleasant read and compared to what I've heard about the iPad as a reading device (that it strains the eyes easily), it would be no contest. Granted, I don't own an iPad so I'm only going on what I've heard but as I said earlier, you should pick a device based on what she wants to do with the tablet. Also keep in mind the screen size - the Fire is 7" and the iPad is nearly 10". The iPad 2 also weighs ~ 600g (1.3 pounds) which is considerably heavier (relatively speaking) than the Fire (414g or 0.91 pounds).

    Before you go purchase it, ask her what she would do with a tablet if she had one. If she plans to do anything beyond consuming media (this includes not only movies and music but also documents), the iPad is probably a smarter choice.

    One thing I didn't mention earlier is software support. There is no doubt that Apple dominates in terms of software availability and they have a proven track record of getting updates into the hands of consumers. We have no idea how Amazon is going to handle updates to the Fire and we don't know how much work they are going to put into growing the Amazon App Store and since you won't get access to Google's App Market, this might be something to think about.
    Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
    M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
    Writing a Quality Post

  9. #9

    IvanLasston's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location
    Rocky Mountain High, Colorado
    Posts
    2,116
    Specs:
    1.8 GHz i7 MBA 11" OSX 10.8.2
    I have 2 iPads and a 2G Kindle. The E-Ink is better than the iPad for extended reading. It really does have the look of paper. The Fire does not seem to use the E-Ink technology - but they do have a kindle for $79 that does. I bought the Kindle because my wife claimed she didn't like reading on computer screens. After getting the iPad she hasn't touched the Kindle.

    I still like reading on the Kindle better but when I'm traveling I carry just the iPad - it has the Kindle app and I can read but I can do other stuff as well.

    Anyway - for pure book reading the Kindle e-ink is awesome. For everything else the iPad is better. The Fire is new to the game so who knows how it is for reading.

    Lastly if you already are using Mac software and media, and the iPhone, most of that stuff can transfer to the iPad, (apps movies music from itunes), whereas Music and Movies on the Fire will be from Amazon, and you'll need to subscribe to Prime and buy music, and apps from them. There may be a way to transfer non-drm stuff over but if you have any Apple DRM you won't be able to use that media on the Fire.

  10. #10

    RavingMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 07, 2008
    Location
    In Denial
    Posts
    7,950
    Specs:
    4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G
    I have never had an issue reading on my iPad, but have been interested in buying a Kindle anyway.
    But, the page transitions really bug me; flash is the wrong word since there's no backlight, but the white to black and then back I find intolerable after a few pages.
    Is there a way to turn that off?
    I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .

  11. #11

    Tfparrott's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 25, 2011
    Posts
    11
    Because she specifically wants a reader, I ordered her a Kindle Touch. Thanks for the input everybody!

  12. #12

    IvanLasston's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location
    Rocky Mountain High, Colorado
    Posts
    2,116
    Specs:
    1.8 GHz i7 MBA 11" OSX 10.8.2
    Quote Originally Posted by Razormac View Post
    I have never had an issue reading on my iPad, but have been interested in buying a Kindle anyway.
    But, the page transitions really bug me; flash is the wrong word since there's no backlight, but the white to black and then back I find intolerable after a few pages.
    Is there a way to turn that off?
    Unfortunately that is the way e-ink works. Think of it like 1/2 a laser printer. That is - it pretty much wipes the slate - then prints each page. It has gotten faster with each generation so it becomes less noticeable - but it pretty much has to clear the page - then print again. It is also why it takes so - much less power - when displaying the ink is static - the only thing that takes power is the printing of the page.

    I am with you though - I don't mind reading on screens or on the iPad - but the E-Ink is definitely easier on the eyes so for long reading I prefer reading on the Kindle but it is another device and I don't carry it with me often.

  13. #13

    RavingMac's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 07, 2008
    Location
    In Denial
    Posts
    7,950
    Specs:
    4GB Mac Mini 2012, 13" MBA, 15" MacBook Pro OSX 10.7, 32 GB iPhone 3GS, iPad2 64gb 3G
    Quote Originally Posted by IvanLasston View Post
    Unfortunately that is the way e-ink works. Think of it like 1/2 a laser printer. That is - it pretty much wipes the slate - then prints each page. It has gotten faster with each generation so it becomes less noticeable - but it pretty much has to clear the page - then print again. It is also why it takes so - much less power - when displaying the ink is static - the only thing that takes power is the printing of the page.

    I am with you though - I don't mind reading on screens or on the iPad - but the E-Ink is definitely easier on the eyes so for long reading I prefer reading on the Kindle but it is another device and I don't carry it with me often.
    I kind of thought that was the reason--I'm still interested in the Kindle Fire, but think I'll wait till gen 2 (if there is one) since it is significantly thicker than my iPad2.
    I've always wanted to be smart, handsome and modest. But, I guess I'll have to be satisfied with two out of three . . .

  14. #14

    bobtomay's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 22, 2006
    Location
    Texas, where else?
    Posts
    26,541
    Specs:
    15" MBP '06 2.33 C2D 4GB 10.7; 13" MBA '14 1.8 i7 8GB 10.11; 21" iMac '13 2.9 i5 8GB 10.11; 6S
    Just ordered the Fire - hopefully soon enough that I'll get one the first week instead of having to wait 6 months as has been typical for new Amazon hardware if you're not first in line.
    I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
    In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.

  15. #15


    Member Since
    Jan 22, 2010
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    20,911
    Specs:
    Mid-2012 MBP (16GB, 1TB HD), Monoprice 24-inch second monitor, iPhone 5s 32GB, iPad Air 2 64GB
    I have great confidence that the Kindle Fire will be a fine product, but to compare it to an iPad is like comparing a scooter to a car.

    The Kindle Fire, as noted above, has some SERIOUS compromises to get it to that price point. Very little storage, no 3G, no camera, and doesn't use the e-ink screen that is said to be better for long-term reading (I disagree with this but I'm in the minority).

    It also doesn't have the (real) App Store, which means that there's a world of stuff you can't do with a Kindle Fire that you can do with an iPad. This may not be an important factor to people who want a "reader" pad that can do a few other tricks but not much else, but to me it's a dealbreaker, as is the fact that it doesn't run iOS (and Google are *notorious* for not guaranteeing devices that run Android an upgrade path).

    If I was in the market for a device that was primarily a) cheap, b) for reading books and maybe the odd video or playing music and c) checking email and maybe facebook and that's about all, then I think the Kindle Fire could be the top choice. But one of the things I *love* about my iPad is that it keeps "learning" new tricks!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Kindle Fire HD
    By CrimsonRequiem in forum Other Hardware and Peripherals
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-07-2012, 05:01 PM
  2. Demand for Kindle Fire collapses as Apple's iPad continues to dominate
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-05-2012, 08:28 PM
  3. Kindle Fire is On Fire!
    By RavingMac in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-05-2012, 08:54 PM
  4. 'iPad mini' in works to fight Kindle Fire, analyst suggests
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-12-2011, 06:15 PM
  5. Fire and Explosion at iPad2 Plant?
    By RavingMac in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-22-2011, 03:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •