New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography Discussion of all things graphics.

Canon 70-300mm vs. Sigma 70-300mm


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
UncSki1218
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I had ordered the Canon 70-300mm IS lens. I called today since it had been a while since I had ordered it. Turns out its backordered because Canon is fixing a bunch that had problems. The guy on the phone said he would send me this lens for the price of the Canon one.

http://www.expresscameras.com/prodet...8921&display=2

Is this a better lens or am I getting ripped off?
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
I've got a Sigma 50-200MM lens for my Nikon and I have no complaints with it. I bought it used for about half the price of the Nikon Brand lens though....


QUOTE Thanks
Odin_aa

 
Odin_aa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 07, 2005
Location: North Boston, NY
Posts: 604
Odin_aa is a jewel in the roughOdin_aa is a jewel in the roughOdin_aa is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: PowerMac G5 2.3 ghz 6.5 GB ram 20" cinema display ..15" Macbook Pro 2.33 Core 2 Duo 2 Gig RAM

Odin_aa is offline
You would be getting ripped off most likely. I have never owned either lens, however the Canon is an IS lens, which will help you handhold and get decent shots...

I am not a Sigma fan.

http://www.lightcafe.net

New servers, much faster than before
QUOTE Thanks
ecapdeville
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by UncSki1218
I had ordered the Canon 70-300mm IS lens. I called today since it had been a while since I had ordered it. Turns out its backordered because Canon is fixing a bunch that had problems. The guy on the phone said he would send me this lens for the price of the Canon one.

Is this a better lens or am I getting ripped off?
Hi!

I have a Canon EOS 350D with 3 lenses:

Canon 28-90
Canon 75-300
Sigma 55-200 DC

and I have to tell you that since I heard good reviews of the sigma lense I ordered it in ebay from a store in New York (I live in Mexico City), and its the lense that I use over the Canon Lenses, is sharp, perfect...I only use the other lenses if I need something under 75 and over 200.

You dont say if your canon is a digital camera, if it is, you may check if the Sigma lense is DC, because its made for the size of the sensor that its smaller than the real film size.

cheers from mexico city
QUOTE Thanks
UncSki1218
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Yeah mines digital and so is the sigma lens. any more opinions?
QUOTE Thanks
UncSki1218
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

just read yours a little more carefully. i'm sure the sigma would be fine at 200mm. but, the one i would get is up to 300. i'm afraid that without IS like the canon 70-300 has it might be a little tricky...

anyone else have any ideas on what to do?
QUOTE Thanks
sarahsboy18

 
sarahsboy18's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 30, 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,069
sarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nice
Mac Specs: Mac Pro, 8-Core 2.8Ghz, 10GB RAM, 2x1TB HDDs, iPod U2 Edition

sarahsboy18 is offline
With your maximum aperture being f/4.5 at 70mm I'd definitely spring for the IS. Cancel your order and go elsewhere if you must.

"If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." -Mitch Hedberg
QUOTE Thanks
UncSki1218
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Yeah...The Sigma usually sells for around $200. Not sure why Express Cameras would have it for $599 (on sale from $750). They must have made some odd mistake. So as of now I'll be waiting for the Canon 70-300mm IS.

P.S. Sarahsboy I've come to trust your opinion in photography. Is there any zoom lens that you'd recommend over this lens that won't be a ton more?
QUOTE Thanks
sarahsboy18

 
sarahsboy18's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 30, 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,069
sarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nice
Mac Specs: Mac Pro, 8-Core 2.8Ghz, 10GB RAM, 2x1TB HDDs, iPod U2 Edition

sarahsboy18 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncSki1218
Yeah...The Sigma usually sells for around $200. Not sure why Express Cameras would have it for $599 (on sale from $750). They must have made some odd mistake. So as of now I'll be waiting for the Canon 70-300mm IS.

P.S. Sarahsboy I've come to trust your opinion in photography. Is there any zoom lens that you'd recommend over this lens that won't be a ton more?
I appreciate you saying that! :black:

I don't know exactly what you are planning to use it for... that being said I would probably at least take a look at the 70-200mm F/4L. The higher quality glass, faster AF and faster/consistent aperture across the focal range would make it a great option. It is one of those things where you would sacrifice some features such as IS for quality... but L glass also holds it's value much better for when it comes time to trade up.

That being said if you are really attached to idea of having 300mm than I think you've already found your lens... The DO and L comparable versions of that lens are great... but are also alot more money.

"If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." -Mitch Hedberg
QUOTE Thanks
UncSki1218
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I'm pretty sure I want the extra range of 300mm.

I'll use whatever I get mostly for wildlife and sports (skiing, tennis, and lacrosse).
QUOTE Thanks
sarahsboy18

 
sarahsboy18's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 30, 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,069
sarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nice
Mac Specs: Mac Pro, 8-Core 2.8Ghz, 10GB RAM, 2x1TB HDDs, iPod U2 Edition

sarahsboy18 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncSki1218
I'm pretty sure I want the extra range of 300mm.

I'll use whatever I get mostly for wildlife and sports (skiing, tennis, and lacrosse).
Your actual focal length on the smaller chip would be 91-260mm. The nice thing about the F/4 version is that it has a better minimum focus distance putting your magnication at 0.26X which is pretty much the same as the 70-300mm(91-390mm) from what I can tell.

One other thing about the L glass is that you could probably put an 1.4X extender and get the longer focal distance and still have a higher image quality than the 70-300mm wide open.

"If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." -Mitch Hedberg
QUOTE Thanks
Odin_aa

 
Odin_aa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 07, 2005
Location: North Boston, NY
Posts: 604
Odin_aa is a jewel in the roughOdin_aa is a jewel in the roughOdin_aa is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: PowerMac G5 2.3 ghz 6.5 GB ram 20" cinema display ..15" Macbook Pro 2.33 Core 2 Duo 2 Gig RAM

Odin_aa is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by UncSki1218
P.S. Sarahsboy I've come to trust your opinion in photography.
Thats a smart move, he knows what he is talking about...hence the three little green boxes under his name.

I am not familiar with all of Canon's glass however assume that they have some higer end lenses and lower end. If you can get a pro lens, it should focus faster on the camera which is important when trying to track moving objects shooting wildlife and sports. I think Canon offers a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens that would be perfect, and when you add a 1.4 or 1.5x teleconverter to it the lens becomes a 110-300ish in focal length that will maintain f/4 throughout its zoom. This option will be a bit more pricey, however you will love the results.

http://www.lightcafe.net

New servers, much faster than before
QUOTE Thanks
sarahsboy18

 
sarahsboy18's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 30, 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,069
sarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nicesarahsboy18 is just really nice
Mac Specs: Mac Pro, 8-Core 2.8Ghz, 10GB RAM, 2x1TB HDDs, iPod U2 Edition

sarahsboy18 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Odin_aa
I think Canon offers a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens that would be perfect, and when you add a 1.4 or 1.5x teleconverter to it the lens becomes a 110-300ish in focal length that will maintain f/4 throughout its zoom. This option will be a bit more pricey, however you will love the results.
I had the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS.... It was my dream lens... absolutely loved it and want it back... It was great with a 1.4X and even with the 2X on it. Unfortunately I had to sell it for some quick cash.

If you can afford to go to the 2.8L it is definitely worth it... It's just a matter of having the cash on hand as the non-IS version runs around $1300 and the IS version runs around $1700.

"If you had a friend who was a tightrope walker, and you were walking down a sidewalk, and he fell, that would be completely unacceptable." -Mitch Hedberg
QUOTE Thanks
Say_Cheese

 
Say_Cheese's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 17, 2006
Location: High Wycombe, Just outside London, England
Posts: 385
Say_Cheese has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: 20" iMac 2.0Ghz, 2Gb RAM Early 2006, 30Gb iPod 5th Gen. 15" MacBookPro, 2.33GHz

Say_Cheese is offline
I have the 70-200 f2.8L IS and it is absolutely gorgeous. I love it to bits and would recomend it to anyone.
QUOTE Thanks
UncSki1218
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I think I may go the way of the 70-200mm f/4L. (Don't have quite enough to spend on one of it's siblings.) I'm doing 95% of shooting with this lens outdoors. So I don't think IS is a must...
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« HELP: Uploading Video off of my Canon Powershot.... | Any free way of using the built in Isight as a medicore camera? »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Canon Pixma iP5200 vs Epson R340 gary Apple Desktops 4 06-29-2006 09:10 AM
Canon SLR UncSki1218 Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography 19 04-20-2006 10:06 PM
picking a canon....some help please BigBear Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography 3 04-16-2006 06:08 PM
Canon Scanner Software Dan Other Hardware and Peripherals 3 07-28-2005 05:50 PM
Print Quality of the Canon IP3000, relative to other Canon models?? VakeJ Other Hardware and Peripherals 0 03-06-2005 02:59 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?