New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Ľ Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Ľ Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography Discussion of all things graphics.

Can you guide me which digital camera best for my profession?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
danielstallon

 
Member Since: Sep 22, 2008
Posts: 4
danielstallon is on a distinguished road

danielstallon is offline
Hey guys,

This is my fist time in this forum, and I am really exited. I'm a beginner photographer and I'm thinking in buying my first canon camera. Most of what I do is portrait, Wedding and fashion photography and I'm still confused which canon camera should i buy. My options are EOS 40D, EOS 450D. Please let me know which one do you think is the best camera for me? My friend refer me one site provides for digital camera reviews. Also, what kind of lenses you recommend would be better to get for this camera?
QUOTE Thanks
BlueMac

 
BlueMac's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 01, 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, NY
Posts: 1,056
BlueMac is a jewel in the roughBlueMac is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: 20" iMac 2.66 GHz... Running 10.5.7

BlueMac is offline
I recommend the 450D, especially seeing as you are just beginning. Two good lens choices would be this one, Canon | Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 28-105mm | 6469A005 | B&H because of it's aperture range and USM focusing capabilities. Since you shoot wedding fashion and portrait, a telephoto lens would greatly benefit you when you need to get in close on the subject, without getting too close like you would have to with a wide angle. This lens is also 28-105, a great wide-telephoto zoom area, which will allow you to not need to carry, say, 3 lenses around that are within this range. Canon | 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM Autofocus Lens | 2565A003 | B&H is another great choice, particularly because of the focal length.



Oh, and always, that is ALWAYS, stay away from third party lenses.

Always.

Flickr

Last.fm
Si, hablo Espa˝ol. Oui, je parle franšais. Yes, I speak English.
QUOTE Thanks
Village Idiot

 
Village Idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 04, 2007
Location: Durtburg, WV
Posts: 2,641
Village Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: Sooper Fast!

Village Idiot is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueMac View Post
I recommend the 450D, especially seeing as you are just beginning. Two good lens choices would be this one, Canon | Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 28-105mm | 6469A005 | B&H because of it's aperture range and USM focusing capabilities. Since you shoot wedding fashion and portrait, a telephoto lens would greatly benefit you when you need to get in close on the subject, without getting too close like you would have to with a wide angle. This lens is also 28-105, a great wide-telephoto zoom area, which will allow you to not need to carry, say, 3 lenses around that are within this range. Canon | 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM Autofocus Lens | 2565A003 | B&H is another great choice, particularly because of the focal length.



Oh, and always, that is ALWAYS, stay away from third party lenses.

Always.
You've seriously had your camera for what, a month?

For wedding photography, full frame is always better. Can it be done without? Yes of course it can. It is being done with crop sensor cameras. Full frame cameras control noise better at higher ISO's due to the size of the pixels on the sensor. The problem is, the sensor is expensive to produce and that makes the cameras expensive. Right now, the cheapest full frame camera can be found for about $1300, and that's a used Canon 5D.

A 40D would be much better than the 450D. You can find them used for about $600 and that's a killer deal on that camera. Up to 6.5fps, metal body, faster AF, much better controls.

For the money & features, it's definitely best to skip entry level Canons unless you must absolutely have one.

Wedding photography....lenses? Fast aperture. 16-35 f/2.8, 24-70 f/2.8, 70-200 f/2.8IS, 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, etc... Range doesn't matter as much as speed when shooting weddings.

Portrait and fashion/glamour? You could get a Canon XTI, Nikon D40, Pentax K100D, Olympus Evolt 510, or Sony a300. It doesn't matter. What matters is ligthing. Portraiture and fashion/glamout photography depend heavily on lighting. You forgot to mention that, huh? A set of strobes would possibly be the most important thing to worry about there, not the camera or equipment.

Third party lenses rock. If you don't have the cash to drop on expensive pro glass by the manufacture that makes your camera, third party lenses are an very good alternative.

Sigma 10-20
Sigma 70-200
Sigma 150-500
Tamron 24-70 f/2.8

Those are some I know off the top of my head that can compete with first party lenses for a fraction of the price.

And always, ALWAYS get a fifth opinion on the internet, you don't know whether the person dishing out advice has 2 months or 2 decades of experience.

Edit: And I forgot, the most important thing is knowledge and patience. If this is going to be a serious hobby it can get expensive and time consuming. There's ways around everything though. You don't have to jump in with a $5000 camera kit and just remember to keep learning as there's always something out there that can help improve your photos and it's not always going to be a new lens or a new camera.

Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech

Slough Roast Blog
Capitol Sound Blog
QUOTE Thanks
Phototini

 
Phototini's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 14, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 95
Phototini will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: 2009 24" Imac 2.93ghz 4gb RAM 640gb HDD GT130 GPU

Phototini is offline
I have to second what Village Idiot stated. Very sound advice, and is worth the read.
QUOTE Thanks
steve535

 
Member Since: Feb 02, 2009
Posts: 23
steve535 is on a distinguished road

steve535 is offline
on a crop body (like my 30D) I would recommend the sigma 30mm or the canon 28mm 1.8. If your budget is no problem go for the canon 35L 1.4. Another great crop body lens is the 17-55 IS 2.8. listen to what the Village Idiot said in his edit. he speaks with much wisdom
QUOTE Thanks
danielstallon

 
Member Since: Sep 22, 2008
Posts: 4
danielstallon is on a distinguished road

danielstallon is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Village Idiot View Post
You've seriously had your camera for what, a month?

For wedding photography, full frame is always better. Can it be done without? Yes of course it can. It is being done with crop sensor cameras. Full frame cameras control noise better at higher ISO's due to the size of the pixels on the sensor. The problem is, the sensor is expensive to produce and that makes the cameras expensive. Right now, the cheapest full frame camera can be found for about $1300, and that's a used Canon 5D.

A 40D would be much better than the 450D. You can find them used for about $600 and that's a killer deal on that camera. Up to 6.5fps, metal body, faster AF, much better controls.

For the money & features, it's definitely best to skip entry level Canons unless you must absolutely have one.

Wedding photography....lenses? Fast aperture. 16-35 f/2.8, 24-70 f/2.8, 70-200 f/2.8IS, 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, etc... Range doesn't matter as much as speed when shooting weddings.

Portrait and fashion/glamour? You could get a Canon XTI, Nikon D40, Pentax K100D, Olympus Evolt 510, or Sony a300. It doesn't matter. What matters is ligthing. Portraiture and fashion/glamout photography depend heavily on lighting. You forgot to mention that, huh? A set of strobes would possibly be the most important thing to worry about there, not the camera or equipment.

Third party lenses rock. If you don't have the cash to drop on expensive pro glass by the manufacture that makes your camera, third party lenses are an very good alternative.

Sigma 10-20
Sigma 70-200
Sigma 150-500
Tamron 24-70 f/2.8

Those are some I know off the top of my head that can compete with first party lenses for a fraction of the price.

And always, ALWAYS get a fifth opinion on the internet, you don't know whether the person dishing out advice has 2 months or 2 decades of experience.

Edit: And I forgot, the most important thing is knowledge and patience. If this is going to be a serious hobby it can get expensive and time consuming. There's ways around everything though. You don't have to jump in with a $5000 camera kit and just remember to keep learning as there's always something out there that can help improve your photos and it's not always going to be a new lens or a new camera.
Thanks for giving advice
QUOTE Thanks
luisfelipetrigo

 
Member Since: Feb 16, 2009
Location: Cancun, Mexico
Posts: 12
luisfelipetrigo is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: iMac 24" 4GBram 500GB HD

luisfelipetrigo is offline
I also agree (and thank) Village Idiot.
Saying much of the same in a different way:
Get fast lenses, this means 2.8. If you can buy one fine, two better. (Make sure they work with full-frame cameras.)
Then, and only then, buy the camera, the best you can afford (I am a Nikon shooter and do not know specifics about Canon products).

Your camera will be obsolete soon... your lenses will last you forever.

Saludos
Luis Felipe
QUOTE Thanks
carpenterken

 
Member Since: Nov 01, 2008
Posts: 66
carpenterken will become famous soon enough

carpenterken is offline
I agree %100 with what Village Idiot said. 5D used. great low light camera.
QUOTE Thanks
Village Idiot

 
Village Idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 04, 2007
Location: Durtburg, WV
Posts: 2,641
Village Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: Sooper Fast!

Village Idiot is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by carpenterken View Post
I agree %100 with what Village Idiot said. 5D used. great low light camera.
Still expensive for some people though...

Quote:
Originally Posted by luisfelipetrigo View Post
I also agree (and thank) Village Idiot.
Saying much of the same in a different way:
Get fast lenses, this means 2.8. If you can buy one fine, two better. (Make sure they work with full-frame cameras.)
Then, and only then, buy the camera, the best you can afford (I am a Nikon shooter and do not know specifics about Canon products).

Your camera will be obsolete soon... your lenses will last you forever.
They're not obsolete, new cameras just get better. People still kill with original Canon 1D's, d30's, and other older cameras.

Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech

Slough Roast Blog
Capitol Sound Blog
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Not a Question about Digital | Some questions about iPhoto »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?