| Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography Discussion of all things graphics. |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Sep 01, 2008
Location: Rhinebeck, NY
Posts: 1,056
![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 20" iMac 2.66 GHz... Running 10.5.7
|
So you want to buy a new lens? Read on to find out what factors you should look for when making a photographic lens decision. I will not recommend any brands, or certain models, because I am not a salesman. So here are the two major lens types: Autofocus, and manual focus. Autofocus lenses does not mean that you can only use autofocus; you can autofocus or manually control the focus. Meanwhile, with a manual focus lens, you may only manually control the focus. Autofocus lenses have another subcategory: Autofocus equipped, which means it has an autofocus motor built in to the lens. These are usually quite expensive. You wouldn't want to bother spending the money on this lens if you have a camera that has a built in autofocus motor, unless the specific lens has some other feature you think you might need. The other type of AF (autofocus) lens is one without a built in motor. Instead, it just has AF contacts and couplings- which allows the camera's built in motor to focus the lens. Hence, if you have a camera that does not have a built in motor (like the D40, or D40x) and you get a lens without a motor, you will only be able to manually focus. This may be a bother for people with a camera without a built in motor, especially if you plan to shoot things like sports, or moving objects, since you will have to manually focus with your subjects every move.
Sorry, not much to say about manual focus lenses. I personally use one, and it's my only lens. Most manual focus lenses in the consumer grade market have been discontinued- but if you really wanted one, you might be able to find one used somewhere. Now, here are some factors to look at: Aperture range Focal length Sharpness read reviews! you might find them useful. Also, stay away from third party lenses such as anything Tamron, Quantaray, or Sunex. Again, I am not the salesman, so I cant say alot. I hope this helped you. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Nov 02, 2008
Posts: 66
![]() Mac Specs: MacBook 2.2 ghz, iPhone 3G, And g5 iMac
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 14, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 95
![]() Mac Specs: 2009 24" Imac 2.93ghz 4gb RAM 640gb HDD GT130 GPU
|
The number one rule of thumb when it comes to lens' is don't skimp on your glass. Buy the best you can afford, and keep in mind if it is to be used on a cropped sensor body or a full frame body (for those of you who are digital shooters). If you plan on upgrading from a cropped sensor body to a full frame body don't buy a crop sensor lens' as you wont be able to take full advantage of that new full body sensor on your new camera. |
||||
| QUOTE Thanks | |||||
![]() Member Since: Apr 04, 2007
Location: Durtburg, WV
Posts: 2,641
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: Sooper Fast!
|
Sorry dude. Get some experience, come back, then tell me why I don't need to spend $3000 on a Canon 16-35 f/2.8L USM and a Canon 80MM f/1.2L USM.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 21, 2009
Posts: 35
![]() |
Quote:
Tamron makes some fine lenses. The 90mm macro, the 17-50, and the 28-75 are a few I've tried and can wholeheartedly recommend. 15" Macbook Pro Un-unibody D700 and lenses |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| C++/ C question | njdevilfan26 | OS X - Development and Darwin | 10 | 01-28-2009 10:48 PM |
| iWeb link text too dark! Not visible... | Christopher | Web Design and Hosting | 3 | 01-07-2008 12:41 PM |
| Which Lens Should I Buy Next? | OSURico112 | Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography | 38 | 06-03-2007 06:53 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 PM.
Powered by vBulletin