New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography Discussion of all things graphics.

Canon xt or xti


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
k3s

 
k3s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 119
k3s is on a distinguished road

k3s is offline
Well i am in the market for a new dslr camera. I have always loved canon so i see it naturally to use it. But i am stuck between the XT and the XTI model. Anyone have experience with both and can say whether there is a big difference between both, since there is a 200 dollar difference between both.
Any suggestions, tips etc..
QUOTE Thanks
Stretch

 
Stretch's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 13, 2007
Location: Central New York
Posts: 4,779
Stretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud ofStretch has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 15in i7 MacBook Pro, 8GB RAM, 120GB SSD, 500GB HD

Stretch is offline
I got the XTi about a year ago, and love it. I debated the same thing when I got mine, and decided that the little extra was worth it.

Blog and Photo Gallery: http://philolin.me/

Currently running OS X 10.10
QUOTE Thanks
k3s

 
k3s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 119
k3s is on a distinguished road

k3s is offline
Yea the more i read up on both the xti seems worth it. The cleaning sensor is a big plus.
QUOTE Thanks
wytwolf

 
wytwolf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 09, 2006
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Posts: 358
wytwolf will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: 2.2Ghz i7 Late 2011 MBP: 16GB Ram 500GB Seagate XT HD

wytwolf is offline
Actually i upgraded today. My xt's auto-focus module was flacking out. When i got the estimate it was just shy the cost the xti body. So is said screw it and bought the body to get the warranty. The xti has a bigger screen, sensor cleaning, 2 more megapixels (not that i counts seeing 8 is more then enough for the avg. person) and more accurate auto focus. I tested it out and it seems to focus faster and alot more accurate in low light. The xti is more compatible with my Canon 17-55mm F2.8 lens. www.dpreview.com is a great sight for reviews and has a great forum also.
QUOTE Thanks
Village Idiot

 
Village Idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 04, 2007
Location: Durtburg, WV
Posts: 2,641
Village Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: Sooper Fast!

Village Idiot is offline
The sensor cleaning is a gimmick. There's two different magazines that did testing and both came up with about the same conclusion. Olympus had the best system being about 40% effective over all with Canon, Nikon, Pentax, and Sony coming is with none of their offerings hitting above %10 effectiveness.

They said Canon's problem (from what I remember of the article) was that the sensor retained a charge which held particles to the filter. The most effective method short of doing a swab cleaning is a blower.

I suggest just buying a blower and giving your sensor a few small blast here and there. It's worked beautifully for me so far and there's no risk of scratching the sensor if you're not touching it and using something as gentle as that.

So don't let something like that sway your choice and make sure you research the features that you find interesting before you purchase. That way you'll find out whether or not they're features that add functionality to the camera, or fall short of your expectations.

Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech

Slough Roast Blog
Capitol Sound Blog
QUOTE Thanks
Village Idiot

 
Village Idiot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 04, 2007
Location: Durtburg, WV
Posts: 2,641
Village Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of lightVillage Idiot is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: Sooper Fast!

Village Idiot is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by wytwolf View Post
Actually i upgraded today. My xt's auto-focus module was flacking out. When i got the estimate it was just shy the cost the xti body. So is said screw it and bought the body to get the warranty. The xti has a bigger screen, sensor cleaning, 2 more megapixels (not that i counts seeing 8 is more then enough for the avg. person) and more accurate auto focus. I tested it out and it seems to focus faster and alot more accurate in low light. The xti is more compatible with my Canon 17-55mm F2.8 lens. www.dpreview.com is a great sight for reviews and has a great forum also.
I'm currently shooting with an 8mp 30D. I had a photo enlarged for a client, it was a 24"x36" print made from a 1-2mb 8mp file. Talk about impressive work...

Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech

Slough Roast Blog
Capitol Sound Blog
QUOTE Thanks
Shalooby

 
Shalooby's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 05, 2008
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 14
Shalooby is an unknown at this point
Mac Specs: MBP 15"

Shalooby is offline
nikon
QUOTE Thanks
k3s

 
k3s's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 02, 2008
Posts: 119
k3s is on a distinguished road

k3s is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shalooby View Post
nikon
Used nikons before, but never have been a fan of them. Yes i have used the dslr's, i just prefer canon.
QUOTE Thanks
AConfire

 
AConfire's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 18, 2008
Location: California
Posts: 146
AConfire will become famous soon enough

AConfire is offline
You might as well get the XTI.

The big difference, in my opinion, is the added LCD on the back of the camera on the XT, which Canon took off for the XTI, bigger LCD is the reason...

XTI is a good solid camera. Sitting neck to neck with the Nikon D40x.

I'd just go for the XTI. It has a 9 point AF system, versus a 7-point. Not a BIIG deal, but hey its actually faster too, especially with faster lenses (i.e. f/2.8)

Don't think about megapixels. That should be the LAST thing that determines which camera to get.

All the best,
-AC



View my photography blog Here!
QUOTE Thanks
DarkKnight369

 
DarkKnight369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 12, 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 87
DarkKnight369 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 17" MBP, 2.5Ghz Penryn Processor, 4GB of RAM, 200 GB 7200 RPM Hard Drive, High Res LED 17" Screen

DarkKnight369 is offline
What about the Xsi? Its suppose to be much better than the other 2 rebels.
QUOTE Thanks
AConfire

 
AConfire's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 18, 2008
Location: California
Posts: 146
AConfire will become famous soon enough

AConfire is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkKnight369 View Post
What about the Xsi? Its suppose to be much better than the other 2 rebels.
From the looks of reviews, the XSI is better than the XTI. It has more features, and delivers better quality photos from its competitors.

So overall, it looks to be another solid camera from Canon, topping the Xti.



View my photography blog Here!
QUOTE Thanks
DarkKnight369

 
DarkKnight369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 12, 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 87
DarkKnight369 is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 17" MBP, 2.5Ghz Penryn Processor, 4GB of RAM, 200 GB 7200 RPM Hard Drive, High Res LED 17" Screen

DarkKnight369 is offline
The Xsi is supposed to share more features with the higher end cameras, which it does. I love the fact that its SD too, especially since I think all cameras will either go that route, or have dual card slots.

I was just in this whole crazy debate over the Xsi and 40D. I took the XSi, got the 40D, and ended up returning it and getting the XSi again.

Some people I know were originally trying to get me to opt for the Xti originally to save money, but the reviews of the XSi were good and made it sound much improved over the XTi.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« In Memory of... | Need some help in illustrator »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Canon XTi litebulb1 Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography 13 11-04-2007 03:02 PM
Canon XTi Users, need an opinion pls. fleurya Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography 35 05-15-2007 02:37 PM
Canon debuts slew of new printers Murlyn Other Hardware and Peripherals 0 09-08-2003 11:42 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?