New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Rumors and Reports Discuss what's going on with Apple in this forum

nasty NASTY Leopord rumor?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
KoDorSean

 
KoDorSean's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 03, 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,371
KoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 2.4 GHz intel core 2 duo MBP, iPhone 5, iPad 3

KoDorSean is offline
I was at my local computer store today in the Mac section talking to one of the employees and he told me that he "heard" that Leopord will NOT work on G4 and earlier Macs. Has anyone else heard anything like this? I REALLY hope this is not true..


I was on the M-F honor roll for month : May 2007
QUOTE Thanks
eric

 
eric's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 04, 2006
Location: twin cities, mn, usa
Posts: 8,708
eric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond reputeeric has a reputation beyond repute

eric is offline
i did a quick google search, and it wouldn't seem likely.

this article summed up some of the basic information pretty well.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1990335,00.asp

seems g4 is still a pretty recently viable technology. i'd guess an individuals success with leopard will depend more on actual clock speed and available ram.
QUOTE Thanks
dtravis7

 
dtravis7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 27,914
dtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac 2.4 C2D 10.10.1, iMac 2.16 C2d 10.6.8, Macbook2007 10.8.4, Mac Mini 10.8.4, iPhone 3GS Note 8!!

dtravis7 is offline
Whoever was saying that is wrong. G3's from what I have heard will not be supported by Leopard but G4's will.

Was that CompUSA by any chance? At the one here in my city the so called salespeople are very very stupid. One did not even know if they had a Mac on the shelves that was right there hooked up working! :spook:

From all I have heard the G4 will be supported by Leopard. Just no G3's which I can understand.

I guess we will find out soon enough though, but I doubt that person knows what he is talking about.
QUOTE Thanks
KoDorSean

 
KoDorSean's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 03, 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,371
KoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 2.4 GHz intel core 2 duo MBP, iPhone 5, iPad 3

KoDorSean is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric View Post
i did a quick google search, and it wouldn't seem likely.

this article summed up some of the basic information pretty well.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1990335,00.asp

seems g4 is still a pretty recently viable technology. i'd guess an individuals success with leopard will depend more on actual clock speed and available ram.
good link. reputation left.


I was on the M-F honor roll for month : May 2007
QUOTE Thanks
KoDorSean

 
KoDorSean's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 03, 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,371
KoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 2.4 GHz intel core 2 duo MBP, iPhone 5, iPad 3

KoDorSean is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtravis7 View Post
Whoever was saying that is wrong. G3's from what I have heard will not be supported by Leopard but G4's will.

Was that CompUSA by any chance? At the one here in my city the so called salespeople are very very stupid. One did not even know if they had a Mac on the shelves that was right there hooked up working! :spook:

From all I have heard the G4 will be supported by G4's. Just no G3's which I can understand.

I guess we will find out soon enough though, but I doubt that person knows what he is talking about.
It was not compusa but I hear you. your comment reminds me of when a friend of mine went to bestbuy and they told him that once his first gen shuffles battery died he had to trash it because the battery could not be replaced.

I hope he is wrong too!

Thanks for the info. reputation left.


I was on the M-F honor roll for month : May 2007
QUOTE Thanks
yogi

 
yogi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 14, 2005
Location: St. Gallen, Switzerland
Posts: 1,967
yogi is a name known to allyogi is a name known to allyogi is a name known to allyogi is a name known to allyogi is a name known to allyogi is a name known to allyogi is a name known to all
Mac Specs: iMac Core i5, iPad, iPhone 4

yogi is offline
That just wouldn't make sense. Apple has a HUGE user base of G4's with their overly successful PowerBooks. These Laptops are still swarming the place until they die and get replaced by C2D MacBook Pros, but if Apple did that to their portables, they might as well stop supporting their desktop iMac G5.

See the point?

If you liked this post, consider using the Reputation System.
QUOTE Thanks
JDann24

 
JDann24's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 18, 2005
Posts: 73
JDann24 is on a distinguished road

JDann24 is offline
I think apple would be making a huge mistake if Leopord didn't support the G4's. I would be very upset if this was true, becasue I bought one of the last of the ibooks earlier this year.
QUOTE Thanks
cazabam

 
cazabam's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 06, 2006
Posts: 1,153
cazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: MacBook 2.0GHz White, 512MB RAM, 60GB HDD

cazabam is offline
I know the mac revolution has seen an upsurge with the Intel macs, but I wonder what percentage of mac notebooks are PPC and what percentage are Intel. Whatever the numbers, I would wager that Apple can't afford to cut out the PPC percentage of the notebook market by dropping G4 support. G3 I can imagine, but not G4.
QUOTE Thanks
schweb

 
schweb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 27, 2002
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 13,198
schweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond reputeschweb has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2

schweb is offline
Consider developers are using Leopard on G4 systems, that rumor would be false.

schweb | community leader
flickr facebook twitter tumblr google+ about.me

Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr

QUOTE Thanks
Aptmunich

 
Aptmunich's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 09, 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 9,073
Aptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2

Aptmunich is offline
Yeah, we have a few test emacs at work that use G4's and run leopard just fine ...


Possibly he was trying to convince you to buy a new machine?
QUOTE Thanks
Quruli
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I knew this was bullocks. Apple wouldnt just abandon PPC that quickly, those I think everyone will understand that the G3s are gone. Maybe 10.6 or .7 at the very earliest IMO.
QUOTE Thanks
Jabjabs

 
Member Since: Feb 02, 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 168
Jabjabs is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 1.25Ghz Mini, 512MB, 40GB

Jabjabs is offline
Yeah about a month ago they used to list Leopard as supporting G3 even saying it was "G3 to Xeon", now that has disappeared but G4 just doesn't seam like;y just yet, they only stopped selling G4 laptops less than 12 months ago.

Mac Life - Apple Mac computers news, forums and more...

http://www.finiteloops.com
QUOTE Thanks
KoDorSean

 
KoDorSean's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 03, 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 2,371
KoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant futureKoDorSean has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 2.4 GHz intel core 2 duo MBP, iPhone 5, iPad 3

KoDorSean is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabjabs View Post
Yeah about a month ago they used to list Leopard as supporting G3 even saying it was "G3 to Xeon", now that has disappeared but G4 just doesn't seam like;y just yet, they only stopped selling G4 laptops less than 12 months ago.
I hope you all are right and it supports G4's. It should. you make a great point about the powerbook. I bought mine 12.5 months ago and it would be crazy to think leopard would not support it.


I was on the M-F honor roll for month : May 2007
QUOTE Thanks
James

 
James's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 27, 2004
Location: Pocola, Oklahoma
Posts: 808
James is a jewel in the roughJames is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 2.66 - 4 Gig Ram, iMac G5 2 Gig ram 20"

James is offline
Ya gotta remember one thing. If Apple writes a new version of OS X and supports every computer they have ever built and supports every printer ever made, and supports every graphics card ever made, what do you have?

An Apple version of Windows...

I can see full support for machines say back 5 years, but expecting them to support from day one just leaves you with a bloated, buggy operating system that really doesn't take advantage of todays machinery. Be like trying to run Vista on a 286 machine with 256 ram... Even Microsoft finally saw the folly in trying to do that.

Just ask yourself this question, do i really expect OSX version 22.13.8 to run on my now new Mac Pro 10 years from now? I certainly don't, and if you want to see advances neither should you.

Mac Pro Intel 2.66 - 4 Gigs Ram - 10.6.1 - 30" Apple Monitor
iMac 24" 2 gigs ram - MacBook Pro
QUOTE Thanks
cazabam

 
cazabam's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 06, 2006
Posts: 1,153
cazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of lightcazabam is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: MacBook 2.0GHz White, 512MB RAM, 60GB HDD

cazabam is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by James View Post
Just ask yourself this question, do i really expect OSX version 22.13.8 to run on my now new Mac Pro 10 years from now? I certainly don't, and if you want to see advances neither should you.
I think that's pretty much accepted the world over. This particular thread is about the mistaken assertion that Apple will drop G4 support as soon as OS X 10.5. I'm sure PPC will go the way of the dodo, but it won't be in Leopard.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Mac is also in best buy now. | Apple's share of U.S. PC market jumps to 6.1 percent »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?