Thread: The new debate...
07-22-2014, 09:48 AM #1
The new debate...
- Member Since
- Feb 14, 2004
- Groves, Texas
- 21in. iMac 10.11 --- HP Linux Mint 18
Undocumented iOS Features left Hidden Backdoors Open in 600 Million Apple Devices
Apple reaffirms it has never worked with any government agency to create a backdoor in any product or service | iMore
Who to believe?Delusions are often functional. A motherís opinions about her childrenís beauty, intelligence, goodness, et cetera ad nauseam, keep her from drowning them at birth.
07-22-2014, 10:50 AM #2
- Member Since
- Jul 11, 2014
- A1286 MBP5,3 running 10.9.5, iphone6, Mac mini1,1 A1176 120/2gb
07-22-2014, 11:23 AM #3
In case where there's a researcher (largely disinterested in choosing sides) and a corporation (very interested in protecting their own side), I'd go with the researcher. Zdziarski has nothing to gain or lose from making this public but Apple has everything to lose.
Regardless of whether or not Apple intended iOS to be snooped on easily (this is not to dismiss intention because it's a huge part of this), it can be and for reasons that make no sense. For example, why does iOS have a packet sniffer or bypass techniques for encryption when the user themselves can't use those? It would appear that Apple is making the grab of personal data easier but only for a select group of people. Is Apple the only mobile company that makes this possible? Not likely.
I think the most important question is "why is this data being leaked and logged?"
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By zleoz57 in forum OS X - Operating SystemReplies: 5Last Post: 04-26-2010, 09:02 PM
By cheesybanana in forum Schweb's LoungeReplies: 25Last Post: 03-12-2008, 06:50 PM
By rs2sensen in forum Images, Graphic Design, and Digital PhotographyReplies: 5Last Post: 10-09-2007, 10:26 AM
By MBNick in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 10Last Post: 09-20-2007, 01:58 PM
By ultimatewisdom in forum Schweb's LoungeReplies: 1Last Post: 12-06-2004, 11:06 PM