New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Rumors and Reports Discuss what's going on with Apple in this forum

What does and doesn't actually speed up your Mac


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
Slydude

 
Slydude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 15, 2009
Location: North Louisiana, USA
Posts: 6,147
Slydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant futureSlydude has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: 2.8 GHz MacBook Pro 10.8,3 8 GB mem, 2.66 GHz Mac Pro - Dead, iPhone 4

Slydude is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryb2448 View Post
Sly if SMARTReporter is indicating a failing drive, simply don't trust the drive.
I don't. That's what prompted the purchase of the SSD.

Sylvester Roque Former Contributing Editor About This Particular Macintosh

"Got Time to breathe. You got time for music." Denver Pyle as Briscoe Darling
QUOTE Thanks
Exodist

 
Exodist's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 26, 2012
Location: Agusan del Norte, Philippines
Posts: 640
Exodist is a jewel in the roughExodist is a jewel in the roughExodist is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: L2012 Mini, i7 2.6Ghz, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD + 1TB HDD, dual 23" LED Displays

Exodist is offline
Yea if you getting Bad Blocks, regardless of what SMART is reporting. Then the drive may not directly be failing, but just getting wore out/ old. If they makes sense.

So yea SSD that bad boy and breath some new life into your machine. Warning though.. Once you get a SSD you will never want to use a regular HDD as your system drive again..


NEW!! Exodist Photography Video Blog
***If someone helps you, please don't forget to use the reputation system.***
QUOTE Thanks
MacInWin

 
MacInWin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 07, 2008
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 2,068
MacInWin is a name known to allMacInWin is a name known to allMacInWin is a name known to allMacInWin is a name known to allMacInWin is a name known to allMacInWin is a name known to allMacInWin is a name known to all
Mac Specs: 2011 MBP, 2008 iMac, iPhone 4S, iPad (Retina), 13" MBP and MacMini

MacInWin is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exodist View Post
The reason a HDD slows down is due to the placement of the data on the platers of the HDD. When data first gets placed on the drive, it is placed to the center of the drive. Thus when the arm that holds the read/write heads moves, it has a shorter distance to move to gather the data. When it has to move to the outside of the platters the segments are generally spaced further apart due to rotation speed and it takes the drive longer to find and move the data.

A SSD on the other hand, it just RAM chips and no mechanical slow downs are present..


Hope this explains..
Actually, modern drives use Zone Bit Recording (ZBR) which adds more blocks to tracks further from the spindle. Instead of having the same number of blocks on each track, the longer tracks at the outer edge have more blocks, hence more data. The tracks are grouped in zones of adjacent tracks and the number of block in the zone increases from the center out by zone. The object is to have the bits/second remain relatively constant as the heads move from the faster outer tracks to the slower inner tracks.

As a result of this technology, the fastest transfers from disks now occur on the outer tracks, so the drives use the space there first, then move inward to where there are fewer zones and slower data transfers. The tracks are all the same distance apart, so the fact that outer tracks have more data in them mean that the heads can sit on one track longer, reducing the total time to transfer because there are fewer head movements on the outer tracks.

- Jake
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« New Blog: Learning the Command Line ? Shell Scripts | Snow Leopard updates »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?