02-27-2012, 07:30 PM #1AT&T aims to have developers pay for app bandwidth usage
AT&T aims to have developers pay for app bandwidth usage
At an interview during the Mobile World Congress going on in Spain this week, AT&T executive John Donovan told the Wall Street Journal that the company is apparently hoping to have app developers pick up some of the cost of network usage. The whole idea sounds kind of dumb, but obviously AT&T wants to make more and more money off of the climbing amounts of network usage, and one idea they've had is to have app developers subsidize the cost of that data. In other words, a developer like Rovio would pay AT&T directly, and then Angry Birds would come with some kind of a "No Network Usage" label, meaning that users wouldn't need to pay AT&T for any data that app happened to use across the network.
TechCrunch's Jordan Crook doesn't waste any time taking the charge to AT&T for this, saying that the whole thing is a "boondoggle" designed to sneak more money out of both developers and users (who are already hit by the rising costs of usage plans). The fact is that most uses don't go anywhere near AT&T's data cap, but it's in the company's best interest to make them think they're almost there, sending out warnings and cautions about how much bandwidth is being used. AT&T's Donovan claims that a plan like this would allow AT&T to avoid raising user costs, but let's be honest: They'll still go up as AT&T charges users more and more on network usage, and they'll also add on costs to developers (who also will likely pay for way more bandwidth than their users actually use).
All of that said, it's doubtful we have much input on this anyway: If AT&T does offer such a usage plan, there are probably plenty of developers willing to pay if it gains them even just a few more app users.
AT&T aims to have developers pay for app bandwidth usage originally appeared on TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
02-27-2012, 09:23 PM #2
- Member Since
- Jan 23, 2008
- Fort Worth, Texas
- 27" iMac i5, 3.2 GHz, iPad 3, iPhone 5c, iPhone 6+, 3 iPods, El Capitan
02-28-2012, 02:55 AM #3
- Member Since
- Jan 17, 2010
- 2.8 GHz 15" MacBook Pro OS X 10.7.x & some old Macs
02-28-2012, 07:30 AM #4
- Member Since
- Apr 20, 2009
- Mac Pro 4.1 15" MBP. 13" MBP. 17" PB. Power Mac G5. Galaxy Note 4 160gb*
I'm calling it quits with AT&T. 3 iPhones with them is enough. Where as AT&T is nickel and dining their customers, Sprint is paying to gain customers, and is the only one to continuously increase in customer appreciation and satisfaction. That's where I'll be going come time.
Their cell service is the only thing we have left from them. We've been trimming them off one by one.
Also, if they seriously think they can get the support from devs to go with this, they are delusional! How much will they be charging them to circumvent the phone user? To me, it's like double dipping! The phone user is already paying to have a data package, now they want the app developers to pay too for data needed for their apps? What's the point of the phone user paying for data then? Doesn't make sense unless they plan un drastically decreasing data limits, while increasing prices at the same time. That's AT&T for ya!“If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself but to your own estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.” Marcus Aurelius
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By rnadjafov in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 9Last Post: 03-10-2014, 10:55 PM
By davidjstix in forum Internet, Networking, and WirelessReplies: 2Last Post: 01-22-2012, 05:32 PM
By princesambit in forum Internet, Networking, and WirelessReplies: 0Last Post: 07-24-2009, 12:35 AM
By jeromejwatson in forum Internet, Networking, and WirelessReplies: 0Last Post: 11-22-2008, 05:42 PM
By w0j07 in forum OS X - Apps and GamesReplies: 4Last Post: 08-30-2008, 08:09 PM