Apple Rumors and Reports Discuss what's going on with Apple in this forum

Powermac G5 2.7 Quad


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
BEEEsH
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Do you guys think we'll see one of these before the intel switch?
QUOTE Thanks
DCraver

 
DCraver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 23, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 747
DCraver is a jewel in the roughDCraver is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iMac G5

DCraver is offline
Isn't it out already?
QUOTE Thanks
zap2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCraver
Isn't it out already?
the one out is 2.5ghz

i bet will we see it , or at least quad 2 and 2.3 PM just becuz i'm betting PM get the last update so i can't see Apple not upgrading them to 2.7 but Apple migth just do quad 2 and 2.3 and some other little stuff on PMs


BUt i DO think there will be no more 'book updates cuz those PB update were weak!(but their still NICE computers)

Last edited by zap2; 10-29-2005 at 05:02 PM.
QUOTE Thanks
DCraver

 
DCraver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 23, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 747
DCraver is a jewel in the roughDCraver is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iMac G5

DCraver is offline
Maybe, because I read somewhere, they would have the PowerPC's on one side of the store and the Intels on the other side. I still like the PowerPC's. I don't like the idea of the Intels.
QUOTE Thanks
lonerider

 
lonerider's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: 150
lonerider will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: iBook G4 1.2 1.25Gig RAM Emac 1.42Ghz 1GB RAM

lonerider is offline
If you have one of the old Dual 2.7Ghz boxes, probably :

http://www.macosrumors.com/

Quote:
sources in the third-party processor upgrade industry are suggesting that dual-dual-core upgrades may be possible for owners of previous-generation dual G5's. For example, an owner of an original-iteration, liquid-cooled dual 2.5GHz G5 (970FX) could potentially get two 2.5GHz PowerPC 970MP processors on an upgrade card to replace the original CPU's. Although this wouldn't match the quad-optimized architecture, greater memory bandwidth, or PCI Express broadband expansion bus archtecture of the latest dual-core PMG5's....this would be an appealing solution for owners of previous G5 systems. The existence of 970MP G5 prototypes at Apple hooked up to previous-generation DDR400-based system controllers bolster this rumor and we have hope that such upgrades will see the light of day in a matter of months if all goes well.
QUOTE Thanks
DuGong
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

i heard that the G5's have to go up to 3ghz.... then that will be the end.. that was apart of the contract.... i thnk
QUOTE Thanks
zap2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

no, i doubt Apple wil use a Quad 3ghz cuz then what reason did the have for switching to intel?( laptops could have gotten Dual G4s)
QUOTE Thanks
DCraver

 
DCraver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 23, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 747
DCraver is a jewel in the roughDCraver is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iMac G5

DCraver is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by zap2
no, i doubt Apple wil use a Quad 3ghz cuz then what reason did the have for switching to intel?( laptops could have gotten Dual G4s)
They could maybe make like a 4GHz Intel or something.
QUOTE Thanks
mynameis

 
Member Since: Sep 30, 2004
Posts: 3,378
mynameis is just really nicemynameis is just really nicemynameis is just really nicemynameis is just really nice

mynameis is offline
Why does it matter? .2ghz is hardly enough of a performance bump to worry about.
QUOTE Thanks
BEEEsH
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I see apple coming into their intel era using the powerpc concept of: dual processor + dual core. I think that in terms of hardware it will seperate them quite a bit from other intel based performance pc's. I think that we'll likely see dual 3.6ghz p4 processors with quad core.
QUOTE Thanks
zap2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCraver
They could maybe make like a 4GHz Intel or something.

True but RAW CPU does not make a good computer, this is were the Mhz Myth comes into play. 3ghz PPC would lilkly be faster then a 4ghz x86(intel) chip.
QUOTE Thanks
BEEEsH
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I just hope that when apple does start rolling out their new systems they make them as powerful as possible. Sure, a 3.8/4.2ghz intel extreme is nice, but not when compared to a dual 2.5 quad core system.
QUOTE Thanks
MAC-simus

 
MAC-simus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 442
MAC-simus has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: 2GHz C2D macbook

MAC-simus is offline
I think it's too early to speak about intel based powermacs. apple said 2006-2007 timeframe for transition, with its pro hardware to be the last to change. I believe first intel mac we see will be mac mini, iBook and maybe iMac. could also be powerbooks, since G4 development is going nowhere. as for powermacs, I do not expect to see one until late 2006 or mid 2007.
QUOTE Thanks
Amen-Moses

 
Member Since: Apr 25, 2003
Location: The home of the free and the land that did for Braveheart.
Posts: 1,301
Amen-Moses is just really niceAmen-Moses is just really niceAmen-Moses is just really niceAmen-Moses is just really nice
Mac Specs: 24"iMac, 15"MB-Pro, MacBook, G4 iMac, PM G5 2x2Ghz, G4 iBook & Some PCs

Amen-Moses is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by zap2
True but RAW CPU does not make a good computer, this is were the Mhz Myth comes into play. 3ghz PPC would lilkly be faster then a 4ghz x86(intel) chip.
Certainly would be:

(Rendering benchmark test - lower time is better)
Old dual 2.5 - 38 seconds
Quad 2.5 - 17 seconds
Dual 2.8 Xeon - 49 seconds

It will be quite some time before anything from Intel will be able to compete with the new quad PPC systems and there is nothing to stop them using an 8 core system if they wish.

btw, a new chip start up company has announced dual core low power PowerPCs:

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1875302,00.asp

Amen-Moses
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,306
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
IIRC I read that the Dual Core process was never intended or planned for the 2.7Ghz processors....


QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Is it true? | Intel on everything? »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Swap a PowerMac for an iMac? Smileyguy Apple Desktops 4 12-27-2005 11:17 AM
New Powermac PowerBookG4 Apple Desktops 22 10-27-2005 10:19 AM
dual 2.3 vs 2.7 powermac differences coach_z Apple Desktops 2 10-21-2005 01:08 PM
imac or powermac? atacinus Switcher Hangout 14 05-07-2005 02:52 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?