Apple Rumors and Reports Discuss what's going on with Apple in this forum

Samsung to Depose Jony Ive and Other Apple Designers, Seeks iPhone 4S Source Code


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
iggibar

 
iggibar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 20, 2009
Location: Up UP and awayyyy!!!
Posts: 3,914
iggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to all
Mac Specs: MBP15" 240gb SSD+128gb SSD, PowerBook17, PowerMacG5, Phone4S 32gb, Phone4 32gb, Galaxy Note 2 80gb.

iggibar is offline
Samsung to Depose Jony Ive and Other Apple Designers, Seeks iPhone 4S Source Code - Mac Rumors

Quote:
[Apple lawyer Cameron] Moore also claimed that because Qualcomm developed the baseband chip in the iPhone 4S — the Qualcomm MDM6610 — and had licence agreements in place for Samsung patents, these agreements would apply to the iPhone 4S. Cochrane said that Samsung experts would need to see the source code for the iPhone 4S firmware to see how the chip interacts with the rest of the phone to determine whether the company's patent is being infringed.
Samsung doesn't need to see Apple's iPhone source code in order for them to be awarded the lawsuit claim...thieves! Pathetic imo.

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
QUOTE Thanks
Nethfel

 
Member Since: Feb 25, 2009
Posts: 2,084
Nethfel is a glorious beacon of lightNethfel is a glorious beacon of lightNethfel is a glorious beacon of lightNethfel is a glorious beacon of lightNethfel is a glorious beacon of lightNethfel is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: 2012 Non-retina MBP, 2.6GHz i7, 8GB RAM, Antiglare Screen

Nethfel is offline
That seems weird to me - If qualcomm had license agreements to use the technology in the chips, wouldn't the license follow the chips? I mean, it would seem that it's double dipping for samsung to get paid license fees from qualcomm, then to get license fees for the same component by the next level of manufacturer? I'm no lawyer so I'm probably way off base here for how it's handled in the real world but if feels like a double dip fee to me.

My Macs: 2012 Non-Retina 15" MBP; Mac mini G4, 1.25 GHz, 512m ram (server); Late 2011 11" MBA, 1.8GHz i7, 4Gig Ram, 256Gig SSD, HD3000; Powerbook 12" G4 1.33GHz running Debian as a server; Apple TV (1080p version)
QUOTE Thanks
iggibar

 
iggibar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 20, 2009
Location: Up UP and awayyyy!!!
Posts: 3,914
iggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to alliggibar is a name known to all
Mac Specs: MBP15" 240gb SSD+128gb SSD, PowerBook17, PowerMacG5, Phone4S 32gb, Phone4 32gb, Galaxy Note 2 80gb.

iggibar is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nethfel View Post
That seems weird to me - If qualcomm had license agreements to use the technology in the chips, wouldn't the license follow the chips? I mean, it would seem that it's double dipping for samsung
That's how I view it too. I have a feeling there is more to this than is written online about the case.

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Hidden "Drop Box" feature in Mac OS X Lion lets you sync files across Macs | PBS to air Steve Jobs documentary on November 2nd »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?