Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 138
  1. #46


    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Quote Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
    And fer the luv of Dog… Apple is not gonna make a stupid touchscreen Mac!!!!!! It's a stupid dumb bad idea. Touchscreen is well suited to handheld devices… NOT desktop displays. Doubt me? Spend 15 minutes pretending your screen is a touchscreen one. Enjoy your gorilla arm syndrome.

    And yes… I know Apple has a patent for an iMac that "morphs" downward into a position for use as a touchscreen. They also have a patent for a click-wheel iPhone, styled after the iPod, and we all know THAT will never happen.
    Everyone thought the ipod was pointless and was a stupid idea and it'd never sell. And everyone was so wrong. And everyone felt the same way about the iphone. And were wrong again. And yet again with the ipad. And people were yet wrong again.

    Don't talk down the touch screen Macintosh. I think if Apple were to release one it'd be very good. Have faith. And if you don't like what they release, you can always get a non-touch screen Mac. But keep an open mind at least.

    Quote Originally Posted by lemoon View Post
    It would be nice if Apple had "Official Partners" that could sell "Official Hackintosh", offering a budget clone-Apple, instead of being so territorial. More luv, less grudge. ;-)
    As said above Apple tried that a big way in the Non-Steve years. And it was a big fail. Apple would be very dumb to make such a move again.

  2. #47

    Lifeisabeach's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Neptune
    Posts
    7,730
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    Everyone thought the ipod was pointless and was a stupid idea and it'd never sell. And everyone was so wrong. And everyone felt the same way about the iphone. And were wrong again. And yet again with the ipad. And people were yet wrong again.

    Don't talk down the touch screen Macintosh. I think if Apple were to release one it'd be very good. Have faith. And if you don't like what they release, you can always get a non-touch screen Mac. But keep an open mind at least.
    Sorry chief, but unless that touchscreen Mac was laying on my desktop in a position that makes sense for that usage, it's not going to happen. And even that seems incredibly awkward. Jobs already said once as much… they looked into it but it didn't make sense to them. And really it doesn't. I used to work with computer equipment that was touchscreen and trust me… gorilla arm is real and it blows. Apple is moving in the more logical direction with multitouch mice and trackpads. I can see a larger trackpad one day… maybe one that even mirrors the screen (heck… you can more or less do that with an iPad). But the main display… ain't gonna happen. The only people interested are some folks who think it's the trendy thing to do, and some real niche needs in business, but Apple caters to neither of these groups.

    Please verify and include the exact model/year of your Mac and OS X version number (available from "About This Mac", then "More Info" on the Apple menu).
    ------
    Links: Onyx | EasyFind | Apple Hardware Test | How to test your hard drive | The Safe Mac » Adware Removal Guide | Uninstall MacKeeper
    ------
    Lifeisabeach - Mac-Forums Member of the Month June 2009, Feb 2012, and March 2013.

  3. #48

    Chris H.'s Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 03, 2009
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Posts
    2,641
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonRequiem View Post
    I loled a little inside.

    Mac OS XI 11.0 CottonMouth
    Mac OS XI 11.1 CopperHead
    Mac OS XI 11.2 California Mountain Snake
    Mac OS XI 11.3 Sidewinder
    Mac OS XI 11.4 Black Mamba

    You heard it heard first.

    How about species of plants, considering Jobs is a vegetarian?

    This might be over some people's heads.
     iPad Air 2 - iOS 9.3
     iPhone 6 64GB - iOS 9.3
     Mac mini early 2009 - OS X El Capitan 10.11.4
     MacBook unibody/white late 2009 - OS X El Capitan 10.11.4

  4. #49


    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Quote Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
    Sorry chief, but unless that touchscreen Mac was laying on my desktop in a position that makes sense for that usage, it's not going to happen. And even that seems incredibly awkward. Jobs already said once as much… they looked into it but it didn't make sense to them. And really it doesn't. I used to work with computer equipment that was touchscreen and trust me… gorilla arm is real and it blows. Apple is moving in the more logical direction with multitouch mice and trackpads. I can see a larger trackpad one day… maybe one that even mirrors the screen (heck… you can more or less do that with an iPad). But the main display… ain't gonna happen. The only people interested are some folks who think it's the trendy thing to do, and some real niche needs in business, but Apple caters to neither of these groups.
    Well if you are correct why is Apple rushing out to patent so many touchscreen Macintosh ideas now? They have an agenda here. Either a future product in mind. Or are out to stop the competition using these good ideas.

    And your link is:
    1. Almost 2 years old. A lot has changed since then.
    2. Only talks about "no touch screen notebook Macs". Says nothing about touch screen desktop computers.

  5. #50

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,884
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
    Sorry chief, but unless that touchscreen Mac was laying on my desktop in a position that makes sense for that usage, it's not going to happen. And even that seems incredibly awkward. Jobs already said once as much… they looked into it but it didn't make sense to them. And really it doesn't. I used to work with computer equipment that was touchscreen and trust me… gorilla arm is real and it blows. Apple is moving in the more logical direction with multitouch mice and trackpads. I can see a larger trackpad one day… maybe one that even mirrors the screen (heck… you can more or less do that with an iPad). But the main display… ain't gonna happen. The only people interested are some folks who think it's the trendy thing to do, and some real niche needs in business, but Apple caters to neither of these groups.
    I will go on record here and agree with you - I don't see Apple doing a touchscreen desktop or laptop, period.

    Touchscreens are the domain of kiosks and handhelds. They do not work on the desktop. This has been tried and failed on so many occasions that it's a wonder the concept has been resurgent in the past few years (although not surprising, given that the industry keeps trying to run desktop OS tablets that have proven to be an abject failure repeatedly).

    I can see Apple continually evolving the Magic Trackpad concept, but even with oleophobic screens, you still can't get around "gorilla arm". It is a novel concept that looks great on TV and in film, but it just doesn't hold any water in real life.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  6. #51

    bittenapple's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 30, 2007
    Posts
    142
    Oh MY FRILLY PURPLE POLKA DOTTED PONY, I am an idiot. I got the naming of OSes all wrong. Soz.

  7. #52

    bittenapple's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 30, 2007
    Posts
    142
    But I disagree with people who think touch screen laptops or even desktops are pointless. MacBook Air could get a touch screen and could be so kick BUTT IMO.

    Also, massive touch screen not working on desktop? Wacom Cintiq anyone? I understand why someone wouldnt like to touch their screen or find it tiresome but there are ways to implement it propely. And the argument about the other companies tried but failed is not a good comparison. Up until iOS nobody got touch interface right. So, nobody had a touch device as good as an iPhone. Nobody made a proper tablet in right size and proper touch until iPad. So, I wouldn't rule out a good possibility of other touch alternatives. If there is one company that is Apple who can do it I think.

  8. #53


    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Quote Originally Posted by cwa107 View Post
    I will go on record here and agree with you - I don't see Apple doing a touchscreen desktop or laptop, period.
    To a point I agree. Sure Apple's patents make me think why are they even patenting that stuff. But in the long term I see computers becoming more portable to ipad like computers will become the norm and they will be powerful enough for everyone to own one as their main computer. And that of cause will be touch screen. The desktops/notebooks I think won't go touchscreen. Not because it's a bad idea. I quite like the idea.

    I think simply because the ipad to me is the future of computing and the desktop/notebook is not. To me they are outdated models especially the idea of a keyboard/mouse for input. So old fashioned. And will be totally replaced by touch screen tablets.

    And having an idea tried so many times and fail does not automatically make it a bad idea. It just means a lot of people have not done it right. It only takes one product to do it right to make it a success. The ipad for example. Every previous tablet computer really didn't work. Big failures. But Apple made the one good tablet after all the dud ones.

    Would I buy an imac tomorrow if it was touch screen? Probably not. I don't think the technology or UI is there at the moment to make it a useful and nice experience. But in the future who knows.

  9. #54

    Lifeisabeach's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Neptune
    Posts
    7,730
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    Well if you are correct why is Apple rushing out to patent so many touchscreen Macintosh ideas now? They have an agenda here. Either a future product in mind. Or are out to stop the competition using these good ideas.

    And your link is:
    1. Almost 2 years old. A lot has changed since then.
    2. Only talks about "no touch screen notebook Macs". Says nothing about touch screen desktop computers.
    They also got a patent last year for a click-wheel iPhone. This is the way the iPhone was heading before they realized that this way sucked, but they proceeded with the patent anyway to protect their work and ideas. I have little doubt that's the story behind these newer patents regarding desktop displays. As before… Jobs said they looked into it but it made no sense. And it doesn't. It's a strain on the shoulder. The hand gets too much in the way to see what you are doing. For a display that is larger than an iPad and further away, you are using much wider, sweeping motions that make it more difficult vs using a mouse/trackpad. Seriously… I very seriously mean this… pretend you have a touchscreen Mac. Take your hands and fingers and pretend to move your windows around and resize pictures for 30 minutes. Pretend you are playing a game using your fingers instead of a mouse. If you are still convinced after simulating this that this makes sense, then I'll say no more.

    Please verify and include the exact model/year of your Mac and OS X version number (available from "About This Mac", then "More Info" on the Apple menu).
    ------
    Links: Onyx | EasyFind | Apple Hardware Test | How to test your hard drive | The Safe Mac » Adware Removal Guide | Uninstall MacKeeper
    ------
    Lifeisabeach - Mac-Forums Member of the Month June 2009, Feb 2012, and March 2013.

  10. #55

    Lifeisabeach's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 30, 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Neptune
    Posts
    7,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris H. View Post
    How about species of plants, considering Jobs is a vegetarian?

    This might be over some people's heads.
    Mac OS XI Fern?

    Please verify and include the exact model/year of your Mac and OS X version number (available from "About This Mac", then "More Info" on the Apple menu).
    ------
    Links: Onyx | EasyFind | Apple Hardware Test | How to test your hard drive | The Safe Mac » Adware Removal Guide | Uninstall MacKeeper
    ------
    Lifeisabeach - Mac-Forums Member of the Month June 2009, Feb 2012, and March 2013.

  11. #56

    cwa107's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 20, 2006
    Location
    Lake Mary, Florida
    Posts
    26,884
    Specs:
    15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    To a point I agree. Sure Apple's patents make me think why are they even patenting that stuff. But in the long term I see computers becoming more portable to ipad like computers will become the norm and they will be powerful enough for everyone to own one as their main computer. And that of cause will be touch screen. The desktops/notebooks I think won't go touchscreen. Not because it's a bad idea. I quite like the idea.
    I agree as well. I think the iPad is the first proof of concept for the slate formfactor. I can certainly see portables turning into a "hub" like device that travels and docks into different configurations. And in some of those configurations, touch is the primary user-interface.


    I think simply because the ipad to me is the future of computing and the desktop/notebook is not. To me they are outdated models especially the idea of a keyboard/mouse for input. So old fashioned. And will be totally replaced by touch screen tablets.
    I think we are moving in that direction. But I don't see a successful device being a dedicated desktop or traditional laptop formfactor adopting a touchscreen as a primary or secondary UI.

    Granted, computers are many different things to many people. But in terms of content creation, touch is rarely superior to keyboard/mouse/tablet (pen) user interface.

    And having an idea tried so many times and fail does not automatically make it a bad idea. It just means a lot of people have not done it right. It only takes one product to do it right to make it a success. The ipad for example.
    Would I buy an imac tomorrow if it was touch screen? Probably not. I don't think the technology or UI is there at the moment to make it a useful and nice experience. But in the future who knows.
    Oh, so much to say, but we're really going OT here.

    Needless to say, I was not referring to the iPad, which is very different from the Tablet PCs that I was referring to.
    Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!

    https://youtu.be/KHZ8ek-6ccc

  12. #57


    Member Since
    Jan 27, 2007
    Location
    *Brisvegas*
    Posts
    5,658
    Specs:
    17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
    Quote Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
    I very seriously mean this… pretend you have a touchscreen Mac.
    I agree with your entire post there. A touch screen imac with a vertical screen is just silly for the exact reasons you mentioned. But tilting the screen so it almost becomes like a large tablet on the screen kinda works. And then you can have vertical mode for OS X and horizontal mode for iOS (touch) or something. But this is a whole lot of maybes. And it's probably best if Apple stuck to things they know will work.

    And the idea of patenting old work so the competition can't use it and improve on it I didn't think of. You really might be on to something there. We all know how Apple is. They don't want even the tiniest idea (new or old) getting into their competitors hands.

    *************

    And to cwa107:
    The keyboard/mouse or stylus is superior at the moment. I agree. But who knows what the future can bring.

  13. #58

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    I think touchscreen Macs may eventually happen, but I for one think the whole concept of it is stupid. I don't want greasy fingerprints all over my Macbook Pro or an iMac or a Cinema Display.

    It's bad enough on my iPad and iPhone.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr » facebook » twitter » tumblr » google+ » about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  14. #59

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    Quote Originally Posted by bittenapple View Post
    Also, massive touch screen not working on desktop? Wacom Cintiq anyone?
    And how many people have one of those, and how many of your friends have you seen have one in person?

    That's what I thought.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr » facebook » twitter » tumblr » google+ » about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


  15. #60

    schweb's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 27, 2002
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    13,190
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro | LED Cinema Display | iPhone 4 | iPad 2
    Quote Originally Posted by the8thark View Post
    And the idea of patenting old work so the competition can't use it and improve on it I didn't think of. You really might be on to something there. We all know how Apple is. They don't want even the tiniest idea (new or old) getting into their competitors hands.
    And how many patents has Apple received and never implemented? Quite a few. Just because Apple gets a patent on it doesn't mean it will ever see the light of day.
    schweb | community leader
    flickr » facebook » twitter » tumblr » google+ » about.me

    Mac-Forums: On Twitter | On Facebook | On Flickr


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Apple To Hold New iPhone Event On September 12
    By OneMoreThing... in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2012, 02:00 AM
  2. Apple to hold product event on January 27
    By roffir in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: 01-30-2010, 03:46 PM
  3. Apple to hold special event at NAB
    By cwa107 in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-02-2007, 11:19 AM
  4. Apple to hold special event!
    By Gamer in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-18-2004, 10:41 PM
  5. Apple to hold special event 4/28
    By schweb in forum Apple Rumors and Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-22-2003, 02:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •