| Apple Rumors and Reports Discuss what's going on with Apple in this forum |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Jan 27, 2007
Location: *Brisvegas*
Posts: 5,658
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
|
Apple launch new HTML5 page on their website
Apple - HTML5 And a nice article about the page Apple launches HTML5 Showcase page | Browsers | MacUser | Macworld |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 15,302
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
|
Yep, a fine demonstration of HTML5's capabilities (where is that sarcasm button?). There is no reason for me to get a message stating that I need to download Safari when Opera 10.54 and Chrome 5 are more than HTML5 capable.
Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped. M-F Blog :: Write for the blog :: M-F IRC Channel - Chats every Sunday at 8PM EST. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 25,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac C2D Late 2007 20" with 10.8.3, Macbook Santa Rosa 4GB Ram OSX 10.8.3
|
Quote:
I read about this on another site. They are locking out everything but Safari which is not fair. I do get the highest score though for HTML5 compatibility with the Nightly build of WebKit. The HTML5 test - How well does your browser support HTML5? What is that new Opera beta getting on that test? |
|||||
| QUOTE Thanks | ||||||
![]() Member Since: Jan 27, 2007
Location: *Brisvegas*
Posts: 5,658
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
|
Quote:
Safari 4.0.5= 113/160 FireFox 3.6.3= 101/160 Opera 10.5.3= 102/160 So all 3 are pretty much the same. |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 15,302
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
|
Haha, does Safari 4.0.4 really score higher than 4.0.5? (I should update Safari but I guess this is what happens when you don't use a program). Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped. M-F Blog :: Write for the blog :: M-F IRC Channel - Chats every Sunday at 8PM EST. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 25,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac C2D Late 2007 20" with 10.8.3, Macbook Santa Rosa 4GB Ram OSX 10.8.3
|
Safari 4.0.5 = 122
Webkit Nightly Build = 146 Opera 10.5.3 = 102 Firefox 3.6.3 = 101 That is what I am getting on my iMac G5 under 10.5.8. Will check the Intel Mac later and also report on Google Chrome. Edit: Why with 4.0.5 am I getting 122? Does it every time. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 15,302
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
|
How are two different people getting two different numbers for Safari 4.0.5? Hmmm...
I just tested a few browsers here as part of my major browser test session (yes, I am a nerd) and this is what I got: 1. Safari 4.0.4 - 120 2. Chrome 5.0.375.55 - 142 3. Firefox 3.6.3plugin1 - 101 4. Opera 10.54 - 102 Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped. M-F Blog :: Write for the blog :: M-F IRC Channel - Chats every Sunday at 8PM EST. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 25,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac C2D Late 2007 20" with 10.8.3, Macbook Santa Rosa 4GB Ram OSX 10.8.3
|
Screen shots. Safari 4.0.5 under 10.5.8 and Webkit Nightly on same system.
I emptied the Cache in 4.0.5 and still get 122. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 15,302
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)
|
I can't explain the discrepancies unless it was a typo on the8thark's end.
Well, here's another confusing bit: I got 144 on the latest WebKit nightly (just downloaded - June 5th build). Latest chromium nightly: 135. How is the Chromium nightly score lower than Chrome? Boggles the mind! Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped. M-F Blog :: Write for the blog :: M-F IRC Channel - Chats every Sunday at 8PM EST. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 25,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac C2D Late 2007 20" with 10.8.3, Macbook Santa Rosa 4GB Ram OSX 10.8.3
|
Since I posted that Webkit score there has been a new nightly! Getting it now. I hope it's not gone down. Looking at your result it has!
![]() And to make you scratch your head, notice my Webkit score it 2 higher than your latest WebKit build? Edit: Van the plot thickens, just got the latest Webkit nightly and it's still doing 146. I have to fire up the Intel Mac and see if there is a difference from this Power PC G5. On Intel Mac 10.6.3. Safari 4.0.5 gets 120 Vs 122 here. 144 in latest Webkit nightly. So differences are on the G5 Power Pc versions. My question is why do they do better?!!
Last edited by dtravis7; 06-05-2010 at 09:22 PM. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Sep 30, 2007
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 5,787
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac i3 (mid-2010) + OS 10.8; TV 2; iPhone 4S; iPad 1
|
I got 113 out of 160 on Safari 4.0.5 on 10.6.3. What I found interesting was some of the features that the test claims aren't supported:
Quote:
Standing request for all troubleshooting: Please provide your Mac model/year and OS version. Also advise us if you have used or installed any antivirus, security, or "cleaning" software on your Mac. If you have installed MacKeeper in particular, you are hereby advised to uninstall it. --------- If all else fails to fix your problem, read this tip. |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Jan 27, 2007
Location: *Brisvegas*
Posts: 5,658
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Oct 22, 2007
Location: London
Posts: 8,653
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: Mac Mini Core i7 2012 | White 2009 MacBook 2 Ghz | 733 Mhz G4 Quicksilver
|
Quote:
Safari, no doubt, relies on Quiktime for MP3 and AAC playback |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Sep 30, 2007
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 5,787
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac i3 (mid-2010) + OS 10.8; TV 2; iPhone 4S; iPad 1
|
That does seem to be the case. I switched the useragent in Firefox to Mobile Safari, and Apple's HTML 5 demo page will load but I get "Quicktime needed" with the video demo. A couple of the other demos work, but most generate various errors. I'm curious how Chrome would hold up since it has such a high compliance rating. Anyone know how to change the useragent in Chrome? I'm not having much luck finding info on that for the Mac version at least.
Standing request for all troubleshooting: Please provide your Mac model/year and OS version. Also advise us if you have used or installed any antivirus, security, or "cleaning" software on your Mac. If you have installed MacKeeper in particular, you are hereby advised to uninstall it. --------- If all else fails to fix your problem, read this tip. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 25,795
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: iMac C2D Late 2007 20" with 10.8.3, Macbook Santa Rosa 4GB Ram OSX 10.8.3
|
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 AM.
Powered by vBulletin