Well I don't know what people are doing to their computers because I've never encountered the blue screen of death from Windows 95 to the current Vista.
I did however see it on a gas station TV. I thought it was a little comical.
Well I don't know what people are doing to their computers because I've never encountered the blue screen of death from Windows 95 to the current Vista.
I did however see it on a gas station TV. I thought it was a little comical.
BSODs are pretty rare. It's usually caused by hardware problems anyways, so that would technically make the issue the hardware manufacture's fault, but then again, just blame it on windows.
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 13", 2.26 GHz, 2GB, 160GB. iPod touch 2nd gen, 8GB
A PC is cheaper than a Mac. But is it? I've recently bought a new MacBook Pro, and it's also my first Mac. Have a look online though. The specs vs the price. There are many cheap PC's available of a low spec that aren't really fit for use they run so slow. Plenty of RAM, but people seem to use RAM to gage how fast a PC is. Side by side, a laptop with a processor that matched the MacBook Pro's base config 13" model, not really cheaper. All I could find as a rival was the Dell XPS, with much lower battery life, plastic construction, weighed more and doesn't look anywhere near as nice. Find me a new laptop with the spec that matches a Mac, and then look at the price. Not to mention the additional RAM the XPS had will have been torn to shreds by Vista. I have a desktop PC, not even a year old, with 4 gigs of RAM, an Intel core 2 quad processor running at 2.66 GHz and a 500 GB HDD. Running Vista, even when new it's slower than my Mac, which has half as many processing cores and half the RAM.
Dell XPS M1330 - 2.0GHz Processor, 2GB RAM, 160GB HDD, 13" glossy Screen, Vista Home Premium, 9 Cell Battery (still only 3-4 hours life, according to reviews), Integrated Graphics, Wireless N Network card. Total, off the shelf price inc VAT and Delivery, £998.99. ($1637.24)
MacBook Pro 13" - 2.26GHz Processor, 2GB Ram, 160GB HDD, 13" glossy Screen, OSX Leopard, 7 Hour Battery, Integrated Graphics and Wireless N Network card. Inc VAT and delivery, £899.00. ($1473.77)
Mac has slightly higher spec, much better looks and the best keyboard and touch pad I've ever used, is lighter if I'm not mistaken and has a much better OS.
Side by side shops - I agree. Go with the cheaper bargain next door. To the Microsoft shop that is. Get a Mac.
__________________
A Mac is like a piece of shiny new blutack. Very simple, has a huge range of uses and people can't help but play with it. Simple, effective and fun. A PC is like blutack with hair and dirt in it. It will do the job, but won't be nice to use, and the urge to just play with it just isn't there.
A PC is cheaper than a Mac. But is it? I've recently bought a new MacBook Pro, and it's also my first Mac. Have a look online though. The specs vs the price. There are many cheap PC's available of a low spec that aren't really fit for use they run so slow. Plenty of RAM, but people seem to use RAM to gage how fast a PC is. Side by side, a laptop with a processor that matched the MacBook Pro's base config 13" model, not really cheaper. All I could find as a rival was the Dell XPS, with much lower battery life, plastic construction, weighed more and doesn't look anywhere near as nice. Find me a new laptop with the spec that matches a Mac, and then look at the price. Not to mention the additional RAM the XPS had will have been torn to shreds by Vista. I have a desktop PC, not even a year old, with 4 gigs of RAM, an Intel core 2 quad processor running at 2.66 GHz and a 500 GB HDD. Running Vista, even when new it's slower than my Mac, which has half as many processing cores and half the RAM.
Dell XPS M1330 - 2.0GHz Processor, 2GB RAM, 160GB HDD, 13" glossy Screen, Vista Home Premium, 9 Cell Battery (still only 3-4 hours life, according to reviews), Integrated Graphics, Wireless N Network card. Total, off the shelf price inc VAT and Delivery, £998.99. ($1637.24)
MacBook Pro 13" - 2.26GHz Processor, 2GB Ram, 160GB HDD, 13" glossy Screen, OSX Leopard, 7 Hour Battery, Integrated Graphics and Wireless N Network card. Inc VAT and delivery, £899.00. ($1473.77)
Mac has slightly higher spec, much better looks and the best keyboard and touch pad I've ever used, is lighter if I'm not mistaken and has a much better OS.
Side by side shops - I agree. Go with the cheaper bargain next door. To the Microsoft shop that is. Get a Mac.
hmmm you must be getting royally screwed then in the UK because that dell you list would be 850 dollars stateside with a 500gb drive, 4gb RAM. At least stateside Macs are more expensive at the register.
Are Macs worth the premium, it depends on your needs. Might the Mac last longer perhaps too, but lets be real about that as well. Who really keeps any computer more than 2-3yrs with the rate they advance.
But this is all really beside the point because its comparing hardware, something that microsoft doesn't even make directly.
So when you put it all together, MS finally has an ad campaign that sticks (that pc's are cheaper, true or not you can argue all day but most believe this especially the public), they hire David Porter, and are opening stores right next to apple... anyone see a plan here? lol
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 13", 2.26 GHz, 2GB, 160GB. iPod touch 2nd gen, 8GB
I suppose the thing to remember is that there is a lot of decent Microsoft hardware, and as well as this, Microsoft will probably be selling their own products which remain unrivaled by Apple. Microsoft is primarily a software company, and accounting, office, and coding software that they make is of a good quality. I've only been in one Apple store before, but what was primarily on offer was hardware. iPods, Macs and Apple TV. A little healthy competition can be great for the consumers as well. Microsoft is nearly always preceded by Windows, which is just a piece of the pie.
__________________
A Mac is like a piece of shiny new blutack. Very simple, has a huge range of uses and people can't help but play with it. Simple, effective and fun. A PC is like blutack with hair and dirt in it. It will do the job, but won't be nice to use, and the urge to just play with it just isn't there.
Who really keeps any computer more than 2-3yrs with the rate they advance.
A lot of people do. A lot of people still have G5's. And I have a white C2D imac still. Why? Cause it still does the job I need it to. And yes the fact Macs are good for 5 years maybe more is another if it's selling points unlike most PCs.
A lot of people do. A lot of people still have G5's. And I have a white C2D imac still. Why? Cause it still does the job I need it to. And yes the fact Macs are good for 5 years maybe more is another if it's selling points unlike most PCs.
To an extent yes, if we are talking about notebooks. Desktops are a different story.
To me that would be a good thing since Blue is my favorite color! It would make me want to visit the Microsoft store!
With Windows 2k and above the only BSOD's I have ever had/seen were caused by serious hardware faults. Back in the 95 days the BSOD was more common but not with the NT core OS's like 2000, XP, Vista.
I am curious like others as to just what they will sell besides their software products, Zune, Xbox, Accessories at their stores.
To an extent yes, if we are talking about notebooks. Desktops are a different story.
Actually I keep my imacs (and previous desktops) on average 5 tears before I replace them. My current mac is about 3 years old and I have no intention to replace it now, as it still does everything I need it to. And I know a lot of people in the same situation too.
But yes you are right, desktops are replaced sooner then notebooks on average. But there is always the exception to the rule. And I think there is enough exception to the rule with Apple users.
A lot of people do. A lot of people still have G5's. And I have a white C2D imac still. Why? Cause it still does the job I need it to. And yes the fact Macs are good for 5 years maybe more is another if it's selling points unlike most PCs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the8thark
Actually I keep my imacs (and previous desktops) on average 5 tears before I replace them. My current mac is about 3 years old and I have no intention to replace it now, as it still does everything I need it to. And I know a lot of people in the same situation too.
But yes you are right, desktops are replaced sooner then notebooks on average. But there is always the exception to the rule. And I think there is enough exception to the rule with Apple users.
Now that I have my gaming rig setup, I'm just going to be replacing components as needed. New mobo and chip when the i5(I think that's what they're going to call it) comes out, another GPU or two new ones when they come out, faster memory, etc...
Edit: And the whole reason I was posting in this thread....
__________________
Chaotic Evil, Level 1 IT-Tech
Last edited by Village Idiot; 07-31-2009 at 01:47 PM.
Actually I keep my imacs (and previous desktops) on average 5 tears before I replace them. My current mac is about 3 years old and I have no intention to replace it now, as it still does everything I need it to. And I know a lot of people in the same situation too.
But yes you are right, desktops are replaced sooner then notebooks on average. But there is always the exception to the rule. And I think there is enough exception to the rule with Apple users.
Umm that's not really what I was getting at. I said it was a different story because you can upgrade your components on desktop computer.
You can do this on Mac to an extent (Mac Pro).
@ Village that is a very nice comic you have there.
Actually I keep my imacs (and previous desktops) on average 5 tears before I replace them. My current mac is about 3 years old and I have no intention to replace it now, as it still does everything I need it to. And I know a lot of people in the same situation too.
But yes you are right, desktops are replaced sooner then notebooks on average. But there is always the exception to the rule. And I think there is enough exception to the rule with Apple users.
I agree. These days it's hard to keep up with the technology. i find myself replacing mac's every year or so.
I tend to agree with a couple of posters here. What are they going to sell in the stores. Are they going to sell hardware if so what and who's. I can't see any point otherwise.
I think Apple stores worked for Apple as they had a poor presence on the high street. PC machines were and are everywhere, from computer stores to supermarkets.
Microsoft aren't stupid, but I just can't see the point. Maybe all will be clear when the first stores open
