New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Rumors and Reports Discuss what's going on with Apple in this forum

Apple Sued Over Multitouch Patent


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
jpl95

 
Member Since: Apr 10, 2009
Posts: 1
jpl95 is on a distinguished road

jpl95 is offline
The iPhone maker will have 20 days to respond to a suit filed yesterday alleging that Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) infringed on two multi-touch patents used in iPhones, iPod Touch and MacBooks, Sean DeBruine, lead lawyer for Elan Microelectronics, told InternetNews.com.

In the suit, Elan does not specify an amount of money, but does ask the court to triple the actual damages for what the company deems to be Apple's illegal use of its multi-touch technology since 2007. The document also requests an injunction on sales of the devices using what Elan calls "multi-finger" technology, which detects a finger on a touchscreen and lets users move their digits to zoom, rotate and perform other tasks.

DeBruine said that while the suit does call for Apple to stop using the technology, it isn't specifically asking the company to stop selling its products, per se. "We're saying stop using the patented technology, but we're not saying they can't sell iPhones, we don't claim everything in the iPhone is Elan's technology."

Still, the obvious implication is that current models of all of Apple's devices named in the suit would, in fact, be using the technology being called into question.

At issue are two multi-touch patents held by the Taiwan-based chip maker, which claims that Apple has been illegally using the technology. According to court documents, these are Patent No. 5,825,352 entitled "Multiple Finger Contact Sensing Method for Emulating Mouse Buttons and Mouse Operations on a Touch Sensor Pad," and Patent No. 7,274,353, called "Capacitative Touchpad Integrated with Key and Handwriting Functions."

According to the case filed yesterday in San Francisco's U.S. District Court, the suit alleges that "Apple has been on notice of its infringement of the '352 patent since early 2007 and has continued to utilize the patent invention without authorization. In addition, the Apple iPhone and iPod Touch also permit users to switch the capacitative touchscreen between keyboard and handwriting modes, and thus fall within the scope of the '353 patent."

It goes on to claim that Apple is infringing the patents by the sale of "at least its iBook, MacBook, iPhone and iPod Touch products."

As to what compensation Elan is seeking, it appears to be up to the court to decide. "It's up to the courts to assess, the patent law provides for a measure of damages that are not less than a reasonable royalty," said DeBruine. "The amount remains to be seen after the facts are evaluated, it would be premature to estimate."

The case specifically cites that damages awarded are pursuant to patent damage law 35 U.S.C. 284 that calls for adequate compensation that's not "less than a reasonable royalty."

While DeBruine can't comment specifically on the merits of this case, he did say "royalty or licensing agreements are not unusual outcomes for patent cases."

Apple did not return calls seeking comment.

Apple besieged

Two aspects of the case warrant consideration. First, Elan's victory over U.S. rival Synaptics last year could mean that the case has merit, as opposed to the many others filed suits against Apple. Last year, Elan won a preliminary court injunction against Synaptics, which had counter-sued it. The two companies later agreed to a cross-licensing deal allowing them to drop the suits.

And, second, Apple's acting CEO Tim Cook in January made widely reported comments that the company would go after Palm if the Palm Pre, to be released by June, encroaches on any of Apple's multi-touch screen patents.

It's not surprising Apple is defensive of its multitouch technology - its touch-screen feature is at the very core of Apple's iPhone success, which has prompted others to follow suit. Since the first iPhone came out in 2007, Research In Motion (NASDAQ: RIMM) rolled out the BlackBerry Storm while HTC and T-Mobile released the Android-based T-Mobile G1, not to mention the (NASDAQ: PALM) Palm Pre coming this summer.

In other touchscreen legal actions, an overseas communications firm is suing Apple for promoting its iPhone as a touchscreen digital book reader, a concept it claims to have patented over seven years ago.

Berne, Switzerland-based Monec Holding filed a suit earlier this month in a Virginia district court accusing Apple of patent infringement and unfair trade practices for allegedly copying its patent filed in 2002 titled "Electronic device, preferably an electronic book."

Finally, device owners have claimed in other lawsuits that the iPhone 3G didn't deliver on connectivity promises and before that Cisco and Apple tussled over the iPhone trademark.

---

Found the article here.
QUOTE Thanks
McGrory

 
Member Since: Mar 25, 2009
Posts: 47
McGrory can only hope to improve

McGrory is offline
These lawsuit's don't mean anything to Apple, they have enough money to silence almost everyone out there and continue making our great products.

Visit my Blog - Apple of Glasgow

Visit my YouTube Channel - Apple of Glasgow
QUOTE Thanks
cwa107

 
cwa107's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 20, 2006
Location: Middletown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 26,494
cwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond reputecwa107 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15" MBP, Core i7/2GHz, 8GB RAM, 480GB Crucial M500 SSD

cwa107 is offline
I'm surprised these stories still make headlines.

Every time anyone comes out with a successful device that features new interface concepts, all of these little companies and individual inventors come out of the woodwork with lawsuits.

These lawyers are the technology savvy equivalent of ambulance chasers.

Liquid and computers don't mix. It might seem simple, but we see an incredible amount of people post here about spills. Keep drinks and other liquids away from your expensive electronics!
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
This seems like an odd first post. I think I smell a troll.


QUOTE Thanks
ezcompane

 
ezcompane's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 27, 2007
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 298
ezcompane will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 2.5, 6gb ram, 500gb hard drive. 2010 13" MacBook Air 1.86 C2D, 4gb ram, 128gb HD.

ezcompane is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwa107 View Post
I'm surprised these stories still make headlines.

Every time anyone comes out with a successful device that features new interface concepts, all of these little companies and individual inventors come out of the woodwork with lawsuits.

These lawyers are the technology savvy equivalent of ambulance chasers.
i agree. there's always someone out there that is jealous when someone else comes up with a better idea for something that they did. i'm not gonna question whether or not they had the patent or not, but what were they planning to do with it if they did???

LIVE and PSN: EZCOMPANE
2008 MacBook Pro (2.5ghz C2D,6gb,80 SSD, 500 GB), iPad 32GB, iPhone 4 16gb, 2011 MacBook Air (11" 1.87 i7, 4GB, 128GB) 2010 MacBook Air (13" 1.86 C2D, 4gb, 128gb), Boxee, Netgear Stora
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Apple possibly updating Macbooks, Macbook Pros and Pro Apps at WWDC | Snow Leopard and parallel processing »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?