Go Back  Mac-Forums.com  > General Discussions > Apple Rumors and Reports > Apple iPhone to Partner with Verizon Q1 2009

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2009, 02:26 PM   #106 (permalink)
jayrodathome

 
Member Since: Jan 28, 2009
Posts: 1
jayrodathome is on a distinguished road
RIM would be a very unhappy Verizon partner. By 2012 the iPhone may overcome all of it's issues. For now it's an iPod Touch and Storm for me....
jayrodathome is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2009, 04:47 PM   #107 (permalink)
NumberSix

 
NumberSix's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 01, 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 142
NumberSix is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Macbook 2.1GHz Core 2 Duo 4gb
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayrodathome View Post
RIM would be a very unhappy Verizon partner. By 2012 the iPhone may overcome all of it's issues. For now it's an iPod Touch and Storm for me....
RIM is partners with everyone, not just Verizon.

And they should take lessons from Apple, not be unhappy about the iPhone.

The Storm is such a clunky device, I'm amazed it got released in this state.
NumberSix is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2009, 04:11 PM   #108 (permalink)
susanspy

 
Member Since: Feb 13, 2009
Posts: 1
susanspy is on a distinguished road
hello all, I too agree with "The Storm is such a clunky device, I'm amazed it got released in this state." it is really so heavy & ugly sems like you are holding a stone in your hand, no wonder it is brought up with vodaphne but there is no comparassion between it & iphone what say people?

susan
------------------------
god bless
susanspy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 02:54 AM   #109 (permalink)
Garrett-

 
Garrett-'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 18, 2008
Location: Abilene, Tx
Posts: 28
Garrett- is an unknown at this point
Mac Specs: A1226 w/4Gb of RAM
I loathe Verizon. I hope it sticks with ATT.
Garrett- is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 02:23 AM   #110 (permalink)
jffhrdy42

 
Member Since: Feb 01, 2009
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 8
jffhrdy42 is on a distinguished road
i want the iphone i got the ipod touch and love that ithas everything but the phone in it....
my only concern is that i heard att has crappy service true?
jffhrdy42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 02:39 AM   #111 (permalink)
vashpr

 
vashpr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 31, 2008
Location: NJ-PR
Posts: 15
vashpr is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 20" Imac 2.66 C2D 2gb Ram
Quote:
Originally Posted by jffhrdy42 View Post
my only concern is that i heard att has crappy service true?
I got ATT with my iphone and the signal where i live (NJ) is way better than t-mobile and sprint, i havent try verizon yet. So far im happy with the iphone so it makes me happy to stay as a AT&T customer. Now the customer service sometimes knows less than you so be ready to have good laughs.
vashpr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 11:35 AM   #112 (permalink)
osxx

 
Member Since: Jan 19, 2008
Location: houston texas
Posts: 344
osxx will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: mac book pro 2ghz
Quote:
Originally Posted by jffhrdy42 View Post
i want the iphone i got the ipod touch and love that ithas everything but the phone in it....
my only concern is that i heard att has crappy service true?
Depends where you live check to see if you are covered they all and if you
travel a lot I mean all have areas of weak or no coverage there is no perfect
solution so get the provider that works best for your area or sign with AT&T
if you get an I-Phone.
osxx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 12:07 PM   #113 (permalink)
jffhrdy42

 
Member Since: Feb 01, 2009
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 8
jffhrdy42 is on a distinguished road
i live in indianapolis anyone else from here got a take
jffhrdy42 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 01:49 PM   #114 (permalink)
Turk182

 
Member Since: Jan 30, 2009
Posts: 44
Turk182 is an unknown at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staszek View Post
I think he is info wrong. They are testing in CA for the next generation iphone, the signals have been picked up as Wifi and AT&T not Verizon.
I don't know what to tell ya, other than that he was very clear testing is in SD - why is brother is in town - very clear it is verizon - very clear it was an iphone.... so we will see
Turk182 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 05:35 PM   #115 (permalink)
Staszek

 
Member Since: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 68
Staszek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turk182 View Post
I don't know what to tell ya, other than that he was very clear testing is in SD - why is brother is in town - very clear it is verizon - very clear it was an iphone.... so we will see
We yes they are definitely testing the new phone that what I posted as well. Its just they have yet to pick up anything other then GSM and WiFi signals. Since they are able to pick these up I am pretty sure that all the websites like this one would be jumping all over it if they were picking up CDMA signals as well.

I mean I could be wrong but I am pretty sure there will be no CDMA version this time around unless Apple decides to make a dual network phone, which would make it larger then the old one which is no their style.

Secondly unless they have reworked the exclusivity contract the original one was for 5 years which wouldnt be done till June 2012 (maybe slightly earlier on 2012 depending on when they signed it)

"AT&T has exclusive U.S. distribution rights for five years ...... And Apple is barred for that time from developing a version of the iPhone for CDMA wireless networks." USA Today

"There are carrier exclusivity agreements, and there are carrier exclusivity agreements -- and Apple's iPhone deal must have been pretty sweet for Cupertino to guarantee their new hotness to AT&T and AT&T alone for five friggin years. USA Today reports the supposed half-decade deal precludes Apple from developing a CDMA handset in that time (duh), meaning that if you live in the US and don't want to move to AT&T, it's going to be 2012 before you even have a chance at an iPhone. ..." Engadget


Now there were a few articles saying that when the 3g was created the exclusivity was only till 2010 which still means it will not be this year. I have a feeling once Verizon and AT&T both move forward with a 4G network we will see a Verizon version.

I would like to see a Verizon version because it would give some price competition in plans to AT&T.
Staszek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 07:13 PM   #116 (permalink)
osxx

 
Member Since: Jan 19, 2008
Location: houston texas
Posts: 344
osxx will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: mac book pro 2ghz
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staszek View Post
We yes they are definitely testing the new phone that what I posted as well. Its just they have yet to pick up anything other then GSM and WiFi signals. Since they are able to pick these up I am pretty sure that all the websites like this one would be jumping all over it if they were picking up CDMA signals as well.

I mean I could be wrong but I am pretty sure there will be no CDMA version this time around unless Apple decides to make a dual network phone, which would make it larger then the old one which is no their style.

Secondly unless they have reworked the exclusivity contract the original one was for 5 years which wouldnt be done till June 2012 (maybe slightly earlier on 2012 depending on when they signed it)

"AT&T has exclusive U.S. distribution rights for five years ...... And Apple is barred for that time from developing a version of the iPhone for CDMA wireless networks." USA Today

"There are carrier exclusivity agreements, and there are carrier exclusivity agreements -- and Apple's iPhone deal must have been pretty sweet for Cupertino to guarantee their new hotness to AT&T and AT&T alone for five friggin years. USA Today reports the supposed half-decade deal precludes Apple from developing a CDMA handset in that time (duh), meaning that if you live in the US and don't want to move to AT&T, it's going to be 2012 before you even have a chance at an iPhone. ..." Engadget


Now there were a few articles saying that when the 3g was created the exclusivity was only till 2010 which still means it will not be this year. I have a feeling once Verizon and AT&T both move forward with a 4G network we will see a Verizon version.

I would like to see a Verizon version because it would give some price competition in plans to AT&T.
It could make AT&T's price look good after all. but this is all speculation or
wishful thinking for people with other providers.
osxx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 11:41 PM   #117 (permalink)
lifeisabeach

 
lifeisabeach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 30, 2007
Posts: 1,802
lifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nice
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 2 x 2 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon, Mac OS 10.5.2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staszek View Post
Secondly unless they have reworked the exclusivity contract the original one was for 5 years which wouldnt be done till June 2012 (maybe slightly earlier on 2012 depending on when they signed it)

"AT&T has exclusive U.S. distribution rights for five years ...... And Apple is barred for that time from developing a version of the iPhone for CDMA wireless networks." USA Today
I really wish people would stop claiming Apple definitely has a 5-year exclusivity agreement with ATT. This is a RUMOR that has NEVER been officially substantiated, and in fact has been contradicted at times.
When is a five-year deal not a five-year deal? | iPhone Central | Macworld
__________________
It's a "Mac", not a "MAC". There is no such thing as a "MACintosh" computer.
lifeisabeach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2009, 12:38 AM   #118 (permalink)
Staszek

 
Member Since: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 68
Staszek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
I really wish people would stop claiming Apple definitely has a 5-year exclusivity agreement with ATT. This is a RUMOR that has NEVER been officially substantiated, and in fact has been contradicted at times.
When is a five-year deal not a five-year deal? | iPhone Central | Macworld
I really wish you would read my entire thread where I also stated that others have said it would end in 2010.
Staszek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2009, 11:03 AM   #119 (permalink)
lifeisabeach

 
lifeisabeach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 30, 2007
Posts: 1,802
lifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nicelifeisabeach is just really nice
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 2 x 2 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon, Mac OS 10.5.2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Staszek View Post
I really wish you would read my entire thread where I also stated that others have said it would end in 2010.
Actually you said:
Quote:
Secondly unless they have reworked the exclusivity contract the original one was for 5 years which wouldnt be done till June 2012 (maybe slightly earlier on 2012 depending on when they signed it)
You presented that 5-year term as a factual term of the contract, not one that was speculated on. The statement you seem to be referring to:

Quote:
Now there were a few articles saying that when the 3g was created the exclusivity was only till 2010 which still means it will not be this year. I have a feeling once Verizon and AT&T both move forward with a 4G network we will see a Verizon version.
... that neither contradicts your prior statement nor infers that the whole 5-year thing was speculation to begin with. It seems to imply that just the 3G iPhone has a 2-year contract. Perhaps I misinterpreted your statement or perhaps you wrote it out poorly. *shrug* I know I've been guilty of both.
__________________
It's a "Mac", not a "MAC". There is no such thing as a "MACintosh" computer.
lifeisabeach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2009, 12:43 PM   #120 (permalink)
Staszek

 
Member Since: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 68
Staszek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeisabeach View Post
... that neither contradicts your prior statement nor infers that the whole 5-year thing was speculation to begin with. It seems to imply that just the 3G iPhone has a 2-year contract. Perhaps I misinterpreted your statement or perhaps you wrote it out poorly. *shrug* I know I've been guilty of both.
Probably a little of both since I wrote part of it from the iphone then I added to it from my computer.

What I was trying to get to is there is an exclusivity agreement till at least 2010, which means that there will be no GSM iphone in 2009.

I am still not sure it makes sense for there ever to be one since the world market for CDMA is so much smaller then GSM. Also CDMA seems to be a dying technology anyway in the next iterations verizon has talked about switching over to GSM. One last issue is battery life, CDMA tends to be a power hungry network, if you compare most GSM phones with CDMA phones (equal phones) the battery life is always better on the GSM version.

Anyway I would like a Verizon version, I am not switching networks because I am one of the people who actually likes AT&T, especially when I travel.

I just think the competition is good.
Staszek is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Stumble this post
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Official iPhone thread kaidomac Apple Rumors and Reports 7 06-30-2007 09:59 PM

 
 
 
     
Home Calendar Get New
     

Copyright ©2001-2009 Mac-Forums.com. All Rights Reserved. A division of iNET Interactive.

Other iNET Interactive Sites: Web Hosting Talk | Swish Talk | Hosting Catalog.com| Dev Papers| Deleted Domains| Hot Scripts

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.