| Apple Notebooks Apple's notebook computers including MacBook Pro, MacBook, MacBook Air, PowerBook, and iBook. |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Oct 04, 2005
Posts: 76
![]() |
Hi,
I have the 1.5Ghz PB model, and with the new powerbooks released today im thinking of swapping my PB with a new one by adding a little extra cash. Though i have some questions: - is there even a noticable difference between the 1.5ghz and 1.67ghz? - does the change to DDR2 increase processor performance (general work and design apps like photoshop) - is it better to get a 120GB HD 5400 rpm or 100GB HD 7200RPM - the new display on the 17" PB is said to be 46% brighter which seems like a big improvement My current PB has 1.5GB ram, 80GB 5400rpm HD, 9700ATi 128MB, should I upgrade or wait for the intel powerbooks? |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
|
Inactive Staff
Member Since: Dec 24, 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 12,591
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2 x 3.0GHz Quad-Core, 6GB OS X 10.6.8 | 15in MacBook Pro 2.2GHz OS X 10.6.8 | 64GB iPad 2 WiFi
|
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass, It's about learning to dance in the rain! |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Nov 24, 2004
Posts: 726
![]() Mac Specs: Black Colorware PowerBook 1.67 GHz G4, 2 GB DDR2, 100GB 7200 RPM
|
Your current PowerBook is excellent, for starters. The video card you'd get would be exactly the same. The system bus is only 167 MHz on the new processor, so it can't take full (perhaps even any) advantage of the DDR2 RAM. As far as I know the only actual benefit it has is that it's lower power consumption. I personally purchased the 100 GB 7200 RPM model because I like speed, but if you think you'll use up the storage on it, get the 120 GB. If you decide to go with the 7200 RPM, that will improve your performance over your old PB slightly, though. The RAM won't make any difference besides in battery life, and the processor won't make a lot. Practically speaking? You should not upgrade. The performance increase will not justify the added expense. The only reasonable justification I could possibly see is the dual layer Superdrive, but since you didn't mention it, I doubt you'll take advantage of that, either. If you have the money and WANT to upgrade, that's up to you.
'cause when it rains, you know it pours. Last edited by Meyvn; 10-19-2005 at 06:13 PM. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Oct 04, 2005
Posts: 76
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| New Powerbooks and Powermacs after all? | prodikal | Apple Rumors and Reports | 36 | 10-19-2005 02:55 AM |
| iBook performance question | EvoMac | Apple Notebooks | 8 | 05-04-2005 01:14 AM |
| Performance difference between 512mb v 1gb Mac Mini | belkheldar | Apple Desktops | 4 | 02-06-2005 01:49 AM |
| New PowerBooks stacked up against Power Mac G5s | Murlyn | Apple Notebooks | 1 | 09-22-2003 09:41 AM |
| NuPower high-capacity batteries for PowerBooks debut | Murlyn | Apple Notebooks | 2 | 09-16-2003 02:31 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.
Powered by vBulletin