Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Member Since
    May 30, 2011
    Cool Macbook Pro 2010 or 2011?
    Hi there, I've got two choices. Based on our budget and best performance, which do you think is better for a photographer and web designer's laptop?

    Macbook Pro 2010 (refurb)
    13" screen
    2.66ghz Core 2 Duo
    8GM RAM
    240GB OWC Extreme Pro SSD

    Macbook Pro 2011
    13" screen
    2.3ghz Core i5
    8GB RAM
    320GB 5400RPM Hard drive

    Both will be plugged into an external HD monitor also when it's used as a workstation. We may be able to afford a bump to Core i7 or a faster/larger HD on the new model. It looks like last year's model still has faster graphics. With an SSD, the refurb should have much faster disk I/O also.

    So is the difference in processor performance worth it? Thanks in advance for your feedback

  2. #2

    robduckyworth's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 04, 2011
    Reading, UK
    15" MBP, 2.5GHz i7, 750GB, 6770M 1GB, iPad 3, iPhone 4, custom PC
    either will do nicely.

    the refurb will feel alot faster than the 2011, but will do CPU intensive tasks alot slower (video encoding, rendering, and so on).
    If you find a post helpful, don't forget to use the reputation system (top right of post.)
    Join us in the IRC! How? Add me on Steam, Origin or PSN (Vita): robduckyworth

  3. #3

    Dutchlimits's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 24, 2010
    MBP 17inch, Intel Core i7 2,6 Ghz (Boost: 3,2 Ghz), 8GB DDR3 1066Mhz, Nvidia GeForce 330M
    I would choose the 2011 model with the better CPU. You'll be able to upgrade to SSD whenever you want, you can't change the CPU.

  4. #4

    Member Since
    May 31, 2011
    If it doesn't cost a lot more, or same. I would go for the 2011...

  5. #5

    Member Since
    Mar 13, 2011
    2011 MacBook Air, i5 27" IMac, 2010 21.5" IMac, 2010 Mini, 2011 13" MBP, IPhone 4, Airport Extreme
    I just got refurb 2011 i5 for a $1018! So would say watch for a refurb 2011. You will appreciate the faster processor and you can upgrade to he'd to a flash drive later when the prices come down.

  6. #6

    Member Since
    May 31, 2011
    Either machine will work nicely. If you spend more time on the web design side, the 2010 with the SSD will be noticeably faster. It doesn't take an i5 to run CODA or Dreamweaver.

    I have friend who is a professional photographer who lives in Lightroom and Photoshop. When we were informally comparing performance, my i5 was faster, but the difference, except when running some of the filters wasn't all that noticeable. I suspect that with a SSD, the 2010 would be as fast, if not faster, most of the time.

    The only area that we found that the i5 really pulled away was doing encoding, DVD rips, and rendering. If that is in your future, I'd go with the 2011 and save up to get a SSD. Bottom line, you'll be happy with either machine.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-29-2011, 06:48 PM
  2. Macbook Air 11'': late 2010 vs mid 2011
    By renzopanta in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 12:23 PM
  3. 13" Macbook Pro 2010 vs 2011 - your thoughts?
    By roastbeeef in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-21-2011, 11:28 AM
  4. Can Macbook Pro 2011 Replace my 2010 iMac?
    By montana13 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-02-2011, 01:43 PM
  5. Macbook pro 15" 2010 or 2011
    By oldhag1995 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-02-2011, 11:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts