Macbook Pro 2010 or 2011?

chomxxo · chomxxo #1 (**permalink**)

05-30-2011, 02:37 PM

Hi there, I've got two choices. Based on our budget and best performance, which do you think is better for a photographer and web designer's laptop?

Macbook Pro 2010 (refurb)
13" screen
2.66ghz Core 2 Duo
8GM RAM
240GB OWC Extreme Pro SSD

Macbook Pro 2011
13" screen
2.3ghz Core i5
8GB RAM
320GB 5400RPM Hard drive

Both will be plugged into an external HD monitor also when it's used as a workstation. We may be able to afford a bump to Core i7 or a faster/larger HD on the new model. It looks like last year's model still has faster graphics. With an SSD, the refurb should have much faster disk I/O also.

So is the difference in processor performance worth it? Thanks in advance for your feedback

robduckyworth · robduckyworth #2 (**permalink**)

05-30-2011, 03:02 PM

either will do nicely.

the refurb will feel alot faster than the 2011, but will do CPU intensive tasks alot slower (video encoding, rendering, and so on).

Dutchlimits · Dutchlimits #3 (**permalink**)

05-30-2011, 07:03 PM

I would choose the 2011 model with the better CPU. You'll be able to upgrade to SSD whenever you want, you can't change the CPU.

Roelio · Roelio #4 (**permalink**)

05-31-2011, 04:54 AM

If it doesn't cost a lot more, or same. I would go for the 2011...

Mini_mi · Mini_mi #5 (**permalink**)

05-31-2011, 10:49 PM

I just got refurb 2011 i5 for a $1018! So would say watch for a refurb 2011. You will appreciate the faster processor and you can upgrade to he'd to a flash drive later when the prices come down.

ishtech · ishtech #6 (**permalink**)

06-01-2011, 01:05 PM

Either machine will work nicely. If you spend more time on the web design side, the 2010 with the SSD will be noticeably faster. It doesn't take an i5 to run CODA or Dreamweaver.

I have friend who is a professional photographer who lives in Lightroom and Photoshop. When we were informally comparing performance, my i5 was faster, but the difference, except when running some of the filters wasn't all that noticeable. I suspect that with a SSD, the 2010 would be as fast, if not faster, most of the time.

The only area that we found that the i5 really pulled away was doing encoding, DVD rips, and rendering. If that is in your future, I'd go with the 2011 and save up to get a SSD. Bottom line, you'll be happy with either machine.

robduckyworth #2 (permalink)
Member Since: Jan 04, 2011 Location: Reading, UK Posts: 2,972 Mac Specs: 15" MBP, 2.5GHz i7, 750GB, 6770M 1GB, iPad 3, iPhone 4, custom PC	05-30-2011, 03:02 PM either will do nicely. the refurb will feel alot faster than the 2011, but will do CPU intensive tasks alot slower (video encoding, rendering, and so on). If you find a post helpful, don't forget to use the reputation system (top right of post.) Join us in the IRC! How? Add me on Steam, Origin or PSN (Vita): robduckyworth
	QUOTE Thanks

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
13" Macbook Pro 2010 vs 2011 - your thoughts?	roastbeeef	Apple Notebooks	18	07-21-2011 11:28 AM
2011 Macbook Pro Heating	EvanGillon	Apple Notebooks	5	05-25-2011 10:02 PM
Mac OS X 10.7 Lion to support 450 Mbps WiFi on 2011 Thunderbolt MacBook Pro, iMacs	OneMoreThing...	Apple Rumors and Reports	13	05-08-2011 08:59 AM
Buying a MacBook Pro.	Tarek	Apple Notebooks	19	09-11-2010 02:59 PM
MacBook Pro has 'lost' Mac Pro [wireless network]	waltonic	Internet, Networking, and Wireless	0	09-22-2009 01:17 PM

Macbook Pro 2010 or 2011?

Internet Services

Web Development

Digital Marketing

Consumer Tech

chomxxo #1 (permalink)
Member Since: May 30, 2011 Posts: 1	05-30-2011, 02:37 PM Hi there, I've got two choices. Based on our budget and best performance, which do you think is better for a photographer and web designer's laptop? Macbook Pro 2010 (refurb) 13" screen 2.66ghz Core 2 Duo 8GM RAM 240GB OWC Extreme Pro SSD Macbook Pro 2011 13" screen 2.3ghz Core i5 8GB RAM 320GB 5400RPM Hard drive Both will be plugged into an external HD monitor also when it's used as a workstation. We may be able to afford a bump to Core i7 or a faster/larger HD on the new model. It looks like last year's model still has faster graphics. With an SSD, the refurb should have much faster disk I/O also. So is the difference in processor performance worth it? Thanks in advance for your feedback
	QUOTE Thanks

Roelio #4 (permalink)
Member Since: May 31, 2011 Posts: 9	05-31-2011, 04:54 AM If it doesn't cost a lot more, or same. I would go for the 2011...
	QUOTE Thanks

Mini_mi #5 (permalink)
Member Since: Mar 13, 2011 Posts: 224 Mac Specs: 2011 MacBook Air, i5 27" IMac, 2010 21.5" IMac, 2010 Mini, 2011 13" MBP, IPhone 4, Airport Extreme	05-31-2011, 10:49 PM I just got refurb 2011 i5 for a $1018! So would say watch for a refurb 2011. You will appreciate the faster processor and you can upgrade to he'd to a flash drive later when the prices come down.
	QUOTE Thanks

ishtech #6 (permalink)
Member Since: May 31, 2011 Posts: 1	06-01-2011, 01:05 PM Either machine will work nicely. If you spend more time on the web design side, the 2010 with the SSD will be noticeably faster. It doesn't take an i5 to run CODA or Dreamweaver. I have friend who is a professional photographer who lives in Lightroom and Photoshop. When we were informally comparing performance, my i5 was faster, but the difference, except when running some of the filters wasn't all that noticeable. I suspect that with a SSD, the 2010 would be as fast, if not faster, most of the time. The only area that we found that the i5 really pulled away was doing encoding, DVD rips, and rendering. If that is in your future, I'd go with the 2011 and save up to get a SSD. Bottom line, you'll be happy with either machine.
	QUOTE Thanks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)