| Apple Notebooks Apple's notebook computers including MacBook Pro, MacBook, MacBook Air, PowerBook, and iBook. |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 11
![]() |
I currently have a 13" Macbook Air (current gen) and an iPad, and I'm considering replacing my air with a new Sandy Bridge MBP so I went Apple Store grazing.
Noticed a few things: 1) Resolution difference between the 15"s isn't that big of a deal 2) Matte screen however is higher contrast, higher quality screen (they didn't have a High-res non-matte on display). I put up iPhoto next to each other and compared the demo photos, the Matte one was spectacular though the regular screen was good too. 3) Macbook Pros are much slower than my Macbook Air in regular usage despite the huge power difference - SSDs are a must-have these days. And I also noticed that putting a 15" MBP next to 17" MBP that the size of the screen really isn't substantially larger (maybe subjective) but the size of the machine literally makes on semi-portable and one not-portable-at-all. I could imagine taking a 15" MBP with me in a suitcase/bag when needed, but perish the thought with the 17". So now it comes down to 2.3 ghz 15" High res matte 15" Macbook Pro + an Intel SSD + MCE Optibay, which would set me back exactly $3009 ($2359 + 550 + 99). Maybe I will wait...
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 31,974
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 21.5" iMac 2.5 GHz i5, iPad 3rd Gen., 3 iPods
|
I can't advise you on what choice to make as that's a personal decision. However, I guess my eyes are either a great deal older than yours or that I just can't see that much of a difference between the matte display and glossy as far as quality of picture goes.
I do agree with you about the 17" model. In my humble opinion, it's closer to being a desktop machine than portable. I can't imagine hauling it around for any length of time. I don't even like carrying my 13" model around.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 11
![]() |
Quote:
But it's the contrast, especially in the skin tones that make the matte one stand out. Both can be improved with calibration I'm sure. |
|||||
| QUOTE Thanks | ||||||
![]() Member Since: Mar 08, 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 14
![]() Mac Specs: 17" Macbook Pro, 2.3 Ghz i7, 500GB 7200 RPM, 8GB ram, Radeon 6750 1GB, OS X 10.6.6
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 31,974
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 21.5" iMac 2.5 GHz i5, iPad 3rd Gen., 3 iPods
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 29, 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,018
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: -->
|
Your observations are precisely the reason that I do not mind carrying a 17" MBP around. I would not trade my matte display for much at this point. I went from a 13" MBP to my 17" and it is just a hair over 2 lbs heavier, which for me doesn't even make a difference. I would love to see the matte option across the board, not just on the 15 and 17.
15" 2.4GHz i5 256gb SSD MacBook Pro | Dual Drive 2.3GHz i5 Mac mini w/SSD | 11" 1.7GHz i5 64gb MacBook Air | Dual 2.0GHz PowerMac G5 | 24" ACD | 16GB Verizon iPhone 5 | iPad 32GB Verizon LTE | iPad mini 16GB | TV1 | TV3 |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Mar 28, 2011
Location: Ft. Lauderdale/Tallahassee
Posts: 68
![]() Mac Specs: 2011 MacBook Pro, 2.3 GHz i7, 8GB Ram, 750GB HD, Hi-Res AG screen
|
IMHO, if you are seriously looking to get a power house MBP and also on a budget, get the top of line 15 MBP that they carry in the store. This is what I did. 2.3GHz i7, 750GB HD, 4GB Ram, HiRes, and Matte Screen.
After you have this in your hands do the upgrades yourself. Its much cheaper to upgrade the HD and RAM yourself. Frankly, once you do it, you'll wonder why you ever spent time thinking apple should do it. Once you replace the HD with a SSD, you can take the 750GB HD, case it, and use it to store your media. Of course, this is simply what I would do, and I know my thoughts and ways don't always agree with everyone else's. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Sep 29, 2010
Location: BoCo
Posts: 295
![]() Mac Specs: 13inch 2.3 i5 MBP 64gb SSD 320gb HD 8gb 1333
|
Quote:
That said do you really need a 250-300gb SSD if you are using an optibay hdd as well? You could save 250 by going with a 120gb drive instead. And other optical bay HDD bays can be found for ~40 bucks. Also there are rumors of a MBA refresh as soon as june so if you like the portability of the MBA then it might be worth it to wait and see if they come out with sandy bridge i5s. I think the screen on the MBAs look awesome with the same resolution as the normal 15inch MBP, but not matte of course. |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Jan 13, 2007
Location: Central New York
Posts: 4,614
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 15in i7 MacBook Pro, 8GB RAM, 60GB SSD, 500GB HD
|
I just got a 15in hi-res glossy screen MBP. Whether you choose the matte or glossy option, do choose the hi-res screen. It's well worth the $100 upgrade cost.
I will be adding a SSD in the near future and am currently looking at OWC's Mercury Pro drives. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Apr 07, 2011
Posts: 157
![]() |
Sounds like you priced yourself right out of business. No need for all that fluff - $1200+tax will get you a spectacular 13" - perfect for portability, and upgradeable at a later time to 16gig RAM, 1T hard drive, 500gig SSD, 27" Cinema displays (get 3), etc., as $ and needs permit.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 11
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
| QUOTE Thanks | |||
![]() Member Since: Jan 19, 2008
Location: houston texas
Posts: 3,927
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 15 MacBook Pro 2009 32GB iPad 4 32GB iPhone 5 Apple TV 3 AEBS/AE
|
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 11
![]() |
Quote:
Processor speed bump is pretty pointless to me without the gaming GPU capability, otherwise I'm perfectly fine with my 2.13ghz Core 2 duo. I would like a 13" Macbook Pro that's quad core with the 6750 and the Macbook Air screen of course, but who wouldn't.
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Apr 24, 2011
Posts: 11
![]() |
Well, I think I'm going to get the loaded 2.3ghz Macbook Pro 15 with the matte HD screen.
I'm going to hold off on an SSD (none of are in stock anyway) until Lion comes out since I'll be wiping the drive and starting fresh from Lion anyway. I'll stick with the 4GB ram until Lion as well and go 1600 8gb then. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Sep 29, 2010
Location: BoCo
Posts: 295
![]() Mac Specs: 13inch 2.3 i5 MBP 64gb SSD 320gb HD 8gb 1333
|
Quote:
Also I am guessing you meant 2.2ghz? The pros only come in 2.0 and 2.2 right now for the 15s |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| Difference with battery on 15" and 17" MBP unibody? | TheFishGuy | Apple Notebooks | 1 | 06-05-2010 11:04 AM |
| Any 17" MBP owners have changed for 15" MBP? | Gul | Apple Notebooks | 3 | 12-19-2009 10:36 PM |
| Should I Get the New 15" Unibody MBP or the old 17" MBP | af22 | Apple Notebooks | 5 | 01-20-2009 10:31 AM |
| 17" MBP slower than new 15" MBP? | DavyJon3s | Apple Notebooks | 1 | 11-12-2008 10:21 AM |
| MBP 17" to MBP 15" trade in | peekah | Apple Notebooks | 5 | 11-29-2007 12:32 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 PM.
Powered by vBulletin