| Apple Notebooks Apple's notebook computers including MacBook Pro, MacBook, MacBook Air, PowerBook, and iBook. |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Dec 27, 2010
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 19
![]() Mac Specs: 2010 MBP 13" <3
|
Hi,
I've had a 13" MacBook pro for three months now and I really like it, although the new MBP has just come out and I'm already thinking of taking the newer version! I cant make up my mind, so I thought I'd drop a quick post on here with the pros and cons so you lot could make my mind up for me, here are the key deciding points: 2011 i5 CPU (awesome!) Intel 3000 graphics (not really an upgrade) PC1333 RAM (minor upgrade) ThunderBolt (not sure if I would use it or not) 320GB HDD (70 more than I have now, wouldn't use it) 3 hours LESS battery life (sucks) So I could go out and buy the new one, and lose out on at least £200 of value on my current one, or I could go out and get some new RAM and an SSD for my current one... decisions decisions! Also has anyone seen any benchmarks online for the Intel 3000 HD graphics chip? I'd like to know how it performs against the 320m cheers! Matt |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 22, 2011
Posts: 50
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Dec 27, 2010
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 19
![]() Mac Specs: 2010 MBP 13" <3
|
|
||||
| QUOTE Thanks | |||||
![]() Member Since: Jan 12, 2008
Posts: 436
![]() Mac Specs: 13 inch 2012 Air
|
intel graphics tend to do alright on lower resolutions. Im curious to see what kind of performance drop folks that are hooked up to external monitors will see. I do think at max resolutions that intel graphics will really chug chug chug with HD movies.
if they are advertising 7 hours battery you will likely get 4 and a half to 5. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jun 13, 2010
Location: England
Posts: 216
![]() Mac Specs: rMBP 13 2.5GHz 121GB SSD
|
Of course, a fast SSD would be a better upgrade for many people. The only benchmarks I've seen suggested similar performance between the two GPUs - some games ran better on the Intel, some ran better on the 320M - notebookcheck.net (CMD+F '320M') Last edited by northrnchimp; 02-24-2011 at 05:32 PM. Reason: added link |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 25, 2011
Posts: 1
![]() |
I have been following the update eagerly for weeks now, and was also disappointed about the lack of graphics power in the 13". This will be my first mac and I want it to last a long time (3-4 years), so I needed a capable 'all-round' machine.
In the end, I opted to buy the mid 2010 model 2.4G 13" (which was $200 cheaper than it was yesterday ) as it is the better option for myself, sporting the dedicated NVIDIA. A little disappointed, but still happy with the model I bought.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jun 13, 2010
Location: England
Posts: 216
![]() Mac Specs: rMBP 13 2.5GHz 121GB SSD
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 14, 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 21
![]() Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 13", 8gb RAM, 750gb HD
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 32,044
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 21.5" iMac 2.5 GHz i5, iPad 3rd Gen., 3 iPods
|
@safarisurfer:
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Jan 12, 2008
Posts: 436
![]() Mac Specs: 13 inch 2012 Air
|
no where has apple said that. that is pure speculation.
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 22, 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 364
![]() ![]() Mac Specs: MacBook Pro|15" Hi-Res Anti-Glare|2.2 GHz quad i7|4GB RAM
|
Well... From Apple:
Quote:
Quote:
As for my input on your decision, if your current MBP suits your needs, then there isn't any reason you should upgrade. Updates to these machines occur roughly one every year give your take a few months, so there's no sense in chasing the next update unless you're a huge fan of having the latest and greatest. While I wouldn't mind it, I just don't have the resources!
Last edited by Moss; 02-27-2011 at 04:59 PM. |
||
| QUOTE Thanks | |||
![]() Member Since: Feb 15, 2011
Posts: 7
![]() |
i thought i would add my pennys worth and see what you guys think,
i got a brand new mid 2010 macbook pro two weeks ago, My first Mac from amazon uk i got a really good price £875, i knew the new ones were coming but i thought at that price i couldnt turn it down,thinking the new 2011 MBPs would be the usual £1000 plus but it turns out there at the tempting price of £999 i dont know if i should return the one i bought and get the new one?What do you guys think? thanks |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 32,044
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 21.5" iMac 2.5 GHz i5, iPad 3rd Gen., 3 iPods
|
Quote:
Folks have been all too quick to "put down" the new MBP 13" machines without finding out more about them first. (battery life, graphics capability) |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Dec 09, 2010
Posts: 6
![]() |
my 2 cents
i was excited and waiting for the new mpb 13 specs and honestly when it was announced i said - NO WAY! i\ll stay away from getting mbp 13" absolutely not worth it! Intel video.... same 5400rpm hdd, and a thunderbolt doesnt makes any sense here. and what about i5, i bet mine c2d 2,66with 8gb ram works nearly the same ![]() so lets wait for just a OSX Lion
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Mar 10, 2011
Posts: 2
![]() |
Since I recently got the 24" LED Cinema Display, I've been looking to upgrade from my 2008 MacBook (Aluminum Unibody) for a little more juice...so I waited for these new models to come out and, honestly, I'm less than impressed. This is mostly because it's a personal computer so I'm not looking to pay upwards of $1,500 and the 13" models weren't significantly upgraded in my opinion.
Basically, my solution was to purchase the Apple Refurbished MacBook Pro from the last generation. I'm getting a slightly less powerful processor, smaller hard drive (wouldn't have used it), the same RAM, and a better graphics chip (huge plus) for only $929 compared to $1,199 for the new model. I'd also like to point out that the battery life hasn't ACTUALLY changed since the last generation...just the way Apple tests them. Unfortunately, they haven't updated the battery life specs on the page for the refurbished models so they're not doing their best to make it easily dissected information! |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| Dead 2010 Macbook Pro 13" | fro169 | Apple Notebooks | 1 | 12-17-2010 10:40 PM |
| does the 15" macbook pro have a better screen than the 13" macbook pro? | jayt | Apple Notebooks | 2 | 08-08-2009 11:10 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.
Powered by vBulletin