| Apple Notebooks Apple's notebook computers including MacBook Pro, MacBook, MacBook Air, PowerBook, and iBook. |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Aug 03, 2010
Posts: 8
![]() |
Hi guys! (:
Brand spanking new to this forum and MBPs all together. I'm looking to get a 13" and was wondering if the extra $400 is worth it for the better specs. Is there a massive performance difference between the 2.4GHZ and 2.66GHZ? Also the extra 70GB doesn't really appeal to me. I have a desktop at home and I mostly store everything on that any ways, the MBP will most likely be for uni usage. Any comments/opinions will be greatly appreciated! TIA!! |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jul 31, 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 44
![]() Mac Specs: 13" MBP 2.66ghz Intel c2d 4gb RAM 320gb hd, iMac 700mhz Powerpc G4 256mb RAM 30gb hd
|
I would just ignore the hard drive part of the question...it looks like your real question is about which processor. I have one of the 2.66's...its fast and i love it..I have used the 2.4's at work and notice a slight difference but nothing 'massive'. like maybe a couple seconds on most applications, others you cant even tell...this link might help
Benchmarks: New 13-inch MacBook Pros | Laptops | From the Lab | Macworld |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jul 03, 2010
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
|
|||||
| QUOTE Thanks | ||||||
![]() Member Since: Jul 31, 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 44
![]() Mac Specs: 13" MBP 2.66ghz Intel c2d 4gb RAM 320gb hd, iMac 700mhz Powerpc G4 256mb RAM 30gb hd
|
yes the 2.66ghz will be faster...but it all depends on what kind of applications you are using..if you are going to be using some more intensive programs like final cut, adobe creative suite, aperture..you will notice a bigger difference..however if firefox is your main concern dont waste your money, its not a noticeable difference ...if you are more of a home user your computer is excellent for your needs
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jul 03, 2010
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Aug 03, 2010
Posts: 6
![]() |
i have the new 2.4, it is fast.. id dabble in video editing and it holds up great.. if you have any thought to go onto the 2.66 you might aswel go for the 15" mbp with the i5 cpu
MacBook Pro - 13.3" - 2.4Ghz - 4GB DDR3 - 250GB Iphone 3GS - 16GB -- Ipad Wifi - 32GB Ibook - 12" - 1.33Ghz - 1.25GB DDR - 40GB Imac - 15" - 700Mhz - 256MB SDRAM - 40GB |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jan 17, 2010
Posts: 1,469
![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2.8 GHz 15" MacBook Pro OS X 10.7.x & some old Macs
|
Quote:
Getting more RAM helps the most if you run out of it during usage. For example having 32 GB of RAM isn't worthwhile if you daily use around 2 GB with what you do. Also a 2.66 isn't much faster than a 2.4. As mentioned it will only be noticeable when doing something that really needs processing power. It's nice for people who only want a 13" MBP but want the fastest thing available. There are people who use their 13" MBP more intensely so every bit of power they can get is wanted. |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Jul 03, 2010
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Jan 17, 2010
Posts: 1,469
![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2.8 GHz 15" MacBook Pro OS X 10.7.x & some old Macs
|
Getting a faster processor will always make things faster but the question is how noticeable it will be and if that is worth the money. Since you said you have tried one out and noticed it's a bit faster then I think you have answered your own question.
If money is not an obstacle then of course the fastest processor will give you the best performance but a few seconds/minutes faster isn't always worth it for some people. Although if you want the fastest performance when it comes to opening applications for the first time then your hard drive speed is what matters most. |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Jul 03, 2010
Posts: 4
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Jan 17, 2010
Posts: 1,469
![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: 2.8 GHz 15" MacBook Pro OS X 10.7.x & some old Macs
|
Quote:
As I already mentioned you really should be looking into the hard drive speed if you care that much about the speed of opening applications. It will also benefit you when saving files and accessing files on your hard drive. |
|
| QUOTE Thanks | ||
![]() Member Since: Apr 20, 2009
Location: Up UP and awayyyy!!!
Posts: 3,912
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: MBP15" 240gb SSD+128gb SSD, PowerBook17, PowerMacG5, Phone4S 32gb, Phone4 32gb, Galaxy Note 2 80gb.
|
the jump from 2.4 to 2.6 should not be fast enough to shave seconds off opening an app. There isn't that much of a difference in speed! It is noticeable in a prolonged arunning app that is running something(like hd content and such). What you might have noticed is maybe more ram with more apps opened up.
2.4 and 2.6ghz should both open up firefox in the same amount of time because it's not a that big of a program to freshly open(varies if you have different home pages). What's more important that going from 2.4 to 2.6 is getting a faster hard drive! I don't know why people neglect their HDD's and but worry so much about processor. Listen to what EndlessMac said. I don't think that's worth a 400 dollar premium alone with the extra hdd space. You can do a whole lot with 400 bones! Aut viam inveniam aut faciam |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Aug 03, 2010
Posts: 8
![]() |
Thanks a lot for your help guys! (:
I'm guessing if there isn't a massive difference between the 2.4 and 2.66 then I'm not going to bother spending an extra $400 which I believe isn't worth it. Mainly because I'm a uni student and don't have much money laying around hehe ![]() Thanks again! |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.
Powered by vBulletin