New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Notebooks Apple's notebook computers including MacBook Pro, MacBook, MacBook Air, PowerBook, and iBook.

MacBook Pro - Speed of the macBookPro


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
crazypotatos

 
crazypotatos's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2009
Posts: 148
crazypotatos is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook pro 13" 2.26 GHz Core 2 Duo 8GB RAM 750 GB HDD

crazypotatos is offline
I was wondering if the speed of the macbook pro 13 in with the 2.26GHz processor and the 2gb of ram and the 5600 or 5400RPM hard drive runs at a good speed for some video editing?
QUOTE Thanks
CrimsonRequiem

 
CrimsonRequiem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 6,006
CrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to all
Mac Specs: MBP 2.3 Ghz 4GB RAM 860 GB SSD, iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 32GB RAM, Fusion Drive 1TB

CrimsonRequiem is offline
It's do able.

Although having a faster process and more RAM does help.
QUOTE Thanks
crazypotatos

 
crazypotatos's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2009
Posts: 148
crazypotatos is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook pro 13" 2.26 GHz Core 2 Duo 8GB RAM 750 GB HDD

crazypotatos is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrimsonRequiem View Post
It's do able.

Although having a faster process and more RAM does help.
Well right now I have a Pentium 4 2.4 GHZ with 512MB of ram and a 250 and a 80 GB hard drive. (PC) will it run faster than that?
QUOTE Thanks
CrimsonRequiem

 
CrimsonRequiem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 6,006
CrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to allCrimsonRequiem is a name known to all
Mac Specs: MBP 2.3 Ghz 4GB RAM 860 GB SSD, iMac 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 32GB RAM, Fusion Drive 1TB

CrimsonRequiem is offline
There isn't a huge difference between 2.4 and 2.26 Ghz. That's a .14 difference which is tiny.

So I doubt it's going to be any faster.
QUOTE Thanks
dtravis7

 
dtravis7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 27,449
dtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac 2.4 C2D 10.9.4, iMac 2.16 C2d 10.6.8, Macbook2007 10.8.4, Mac Mini 10.8.4, iPhone 3GS IPad1

dtravis7 is offline
A Pentium 4 is not even close in processing power to any of the Intel Core CPU's. You can't just compare the clock of a P4, AMD 64, Core 2 Duo to each other.

The new Intel CPU's are way faster than a Pentium 4 per clock.
QUOTE Thanks
crazypotatos

 
crazypotatos's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2009
Posts: 148
crazypotatos is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook pro 13" 2.26 GHz Core 2 Duo 8GB RAM 750 GB HDD

crazypotatos is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtravis7 View Post
A Pentium 4 is not even close in processing power to any of the Intel Core CPU's. You can't just compare the clock of a P4, AMD 64, Core 2 Duo to each other.

The new Intel CPU's are way faster than a Pentium 4 per clock.
so its going to be much faster?
QUOTE Thanks
clayneal

 
clayneal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 2,146
clayneal is a glorious beacon of lightclayneal is a glorious beacon of lightclayneal is a glorious beacon of lightclayneal is a glorious beacon of lightclayneal is a glorious beacon of lightclayneal is a glorious beacon of light
Mac Specs: late 08 macbook 2.0 4gig 320hdd10.7.3 32 gig iPhone 4s

clayneal is offline
Wow did you read he's reply.
QUOTE Thanks
deathcloud

 
deathcloud's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 25, 2009
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 232
deathcloud is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 13'' Macbook Pro 2.26 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo 2 GB 1067 Mhz DDR3 500 GB 7200rpm HD

deathcloud is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrimsonRequiem View Post
There isn't a huge difference between 2.4 and 2.26 Ghz. That's a .14 difference which is tiny.

So I doubt it's going to be any faster.
Woah woah woah... You are going from an Intel Pentium 4 2.4 SINGLE CORE processor.... and then going to a intel core 2 duo processor 2.26 ghz processor and you are saying that it is going to be a TINY difference? You have to look at FSB which your old single core is probably 400mhz and the intel core 2 duo is 1066mhz and comes with 2gb of DDR3 not DDR2 ram which operates at 1066mhz. Now from the ram alone I heard from DDR2 to DDR3 it operates 30 percent faster which helps for programs like video editing and such. And the processor matters too.

I am going out on a limb going to say that it is going to operate much faster and smother considering the OS and the intel core 2 duo processor upgrade from your old system.

got this from another website

they say that a 2.8Ghz P4 520 does their lame test in 5:05, the Core 2 Duo @ 2.13Ghz does the same test in 3:10, the P4 got 834 in 3DMark 06 while the Core 2 Duo got 1892, and for PCMark 05/CPU the P4 got 3522 while the Core 2 Duo got 5489

so doing the math on those numbers would say that the Core 2 Duo @ 2.13Ghz is 1.8 times faster then a P4 @ 2.8Ghz, and that's with the slowest Core 2 Duo, its not a Conroe

------

So it looks like the intel core 2 duo is 2 times faster than the p4 of 2.8 which is better than your 2.4. so maybe even the upgrade you should see 2.5 times faster with the mac processor (2.26ghz) vs your p4 2.4 processor. I bet the gap would be even better in terms of being faster.
QUOTE Thanks
dtravis7

 
dtravis7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Modesto, Ca.
Posts: 27,449
dtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond reputedtravis7 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac 2.4 C2D 10.9.4, iMac 2.16 C2d 10.6.8, Macbook2007 10.8.4, Mac Mini 10.8.4, iPhone 3GS IPad1

dtravis7 is offline
I have a Pentium 4 3.06Ghz with HT. 2GB Ram. I have a Modded Intel Mac Mini with a 2.16Ghz C2D CPU. Running Handbreak on both machines converting the same video file takes probably 1/2 the time on the Intel Mini with C2D at 2.16Ghz than the P4. It's that way with every Video converter, Encoder and Audio encoding, converting that I have ever tried on both machines.
QUOTE Thanks
B&O

 
B&O's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 18, 2007
Location: Brit in Tokyo.
Posts: 745
B&O has a spectacular aura about
Mac Specs: MBP i7, Mac Mini & iPhone 3G.

B&O is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by deathcloud View Post
Woah woah woah... You are going from an Intel Pentium 4 2.4 SINGLE CORE processor.... and then going to a intel core 2 duo processor 2.26 ghz processor and you are saying that it is going to be a TINY difference? You have to look at FSB which your old single core is probably 400mhz and the intel core 2 duo is 1066mhz and comes with 2gb of DDR3 not DDR2 ram which operates at 1066mhz. Now from the ram alone I heard from DDR2 to DDR3 it operates 30 percent faster which helps for programs like video editing and such. And the processor matters too.

I am going out on a limb going to say that it is going to operate much faster and smother considering the OS and the intel core 2 duo processor upgrade from your old system.

got this from another website

they say that a 2.8Ghz P4 520 does their lame test in 5:05, the Core 2 Duo @ 2.13Ghz does the same test in 3:10, the P4 got 834 in 3DMark 06 while the Core 2 Duo got 1892, and for PCMark 05/CPU the P4 got 3522 while the Core 2 Duo got 5489

so doing the math on those numbers would say that the Core 2 Duo @ 2.13Ghz is 1.8 times faster then a P4 @ 2.8Ghz, and that's with the slowest Core 2 Duo, its not a Conroe

------

So it looks like the intel core 2 duo is 2 times faster than the p4 of 2.8 which is better than your 2.4. so maybe even the upgrade you should see 2.5 times faster with the mac processor (2.26ghz) vs your p4 2.4 processor. I bet the gap would be even better in terms of being faster.
Don't forget L1/2 cache too.

MacBook Pro 2.66Ghz i7. Mac Mini 2.26Ghz C2D
iPhone 3G 16GB iPad 3G 64GB
Check out my flickr
QUOTE Thanks
GSRevs

 
GSRevs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 16, 2009
Posts: 15
GSRevs is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 13" Macbook Pro 2.26GHz 4GB 500GB, 16GB iPod Touch, Nano

GSRevs is offline
You'll be better off w/ the MBP, as others have mentioned. Go for it!

Oh, and it is important to note that the MBP have 2 cores, not 1 like your PC.

I have the same notebook you are looking at buying. Have had it about 3 weeks. I upgraded the RAM to 4GB and the HD to 500GB for about $140. This things zips right along (and can run several programs simultaneously no problem, including Windows7 via VMware Fusion) and has a ton of storage.

13" MacBook Pro 2.26GHz-- 4GB Ram 500GB Western Digital HD
QUOTE Thanks
FISHB124

 
Member Since: Oct 06, 2009
Posts: 41
FISHB124 has a little shameless behaviour in the past

FISHB124 is offline
MBP is by far the most awesomest laptop ever madee!! EVERR!! well.. at least until the next gen MBP2 is made. It will definitely be good for video editing, especially portable video editing. games too. :]
QUOTE Thanks
crazypotatos

 
crazypotatos's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 05, 2009
Posts: 148
crazypotatos is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: MacBook pro 13" 2.26 GHz Core 2 Duo 8GB RAM 750 GB HDD

crazypotatos is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSRevs View Post
You'll be better off w/ the MBP, as others have mentioned. Go for it!

Oh, and it is important to note that the MBP have 2 cores, not 1 like your PC.

I have the same notebook you are looking at buying. Have had it about 3 weeks. I upgraded the RAM to 4GB and the HD to 500GB for about $140. This things zips right along (and can run several programs simultaneously no problem, including Windows7 via VMware Fusion) and has a ton of storage.
I probably wont upgrade the hard drive, I was thinking about a TimeCapsule, since the only thing on my drive will be the current video I am editing and iTunes, which is only about 30GB.

Is there a reason you upgraded the RAM? Did it make the system much faster or just a little bit?

thanks

QUOTE Thanks
DanFlan

 
DanFlan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 27, 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 133
DanFlan is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 15 Inch MacBook Pro. 2.4 GHz. 2GB RAM. 250GB Hardrive.

DanFlan is offline
Honestly you will do just fine with a standard MacBook. 2.24GHz is lots of power and should get the job done. But you never know when the extra power will come in handy, so if you have the money, definitely go for the MBP.

"60% of the time it works, every time."
- Brian Fantana
QUOTE Thanks
GSRevs

 
GSRevs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 16, 2009
Posts: 15
GSRevs is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 13" Macbook Pro 2.26GHz 4GB 500GB, 16GB iPod Touch, Nano

GSRevs is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazypotatos View Post
I probably wont upgrade the hard drive, I was thinking about a TimeCapsule, since the only thing on my drive will be the current video I am editing and iTunes, which is only about 30GB.

Is there a reason you upgraded the RAM? Did it make the system much faster or just a little bit?

thanks
I just wanted more than 2GB of ram. I wanted to be able to run several applications at once (including Windows7) and still have a quick machine.

When I want raw power, I use my PC -- Quad-core running @ 3.5GHz w/ 8GB of RAM.

13" MacBook Pro 2.26GHz-- 4GB Ram 500GB Western Digital HD
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« About to upgrade My Macbook Pro...A Few Questions First | keyboard keys get jammed, mousepad and clickpad(?) too »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
For those confused about aperture and shutter speed. BlueMac Images, Graphic Design, and Digital Photography 38 07-01-2012 07:35 AM
can i use the restore dvds from my MacBookPro 2.4ghz on my MacBookPro 1.83ghz martinz_design OS X - Operating System 4 03-08-2009 01:23 PM
internet speed/ vs router speed shusty Internet, Networking, and Wireless 4 06-15-2007 04:26 AM
Quick mouse speed adjuster enigmafyv OS X - Operating System 2 06-11-2007 09:31 PM
High Speed Internet for G5 Temp Apple Desktops 3 01-27-2004 01:55 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?