Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

Mac Pro - 8 core, maxing out at 45%?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
PowerBookG4

 
PowerBookG4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 08, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,190
PowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 8x3.0ghz 12gb ram 8800GT , MBP 2.16 2GB Ram 17 inch.

PowerBookG4 is offline
I have a 8 core mac pro and its going pretty slowly when it comes to rendering video, the processor meters are indicating that it never goes higher the 45%.

Could anybody shed light on why this is happening? I really need more speed and less engergy conservation right now. I'm trying to get work done.

My Website
Blog
I love my hosting company!
I was on the M-F honor roll for Febuary:2006
QUOTE Thanks
mac57

 
mac57's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 29, 2006
Location: St. Somewhere
Posts: 4,553
mac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant futuremac57 has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM

mac57 is online now
How many threads does the rendering software have? If for example the software only runs in 4 threads, and you have 8 cores, and OS X is an equal opportunity scheduler, you would never see more than 50% occupancy on any one CPU. This is likely what is going on, and is the real fallacy of the "more cores = more power" approach. You can only utilize more cores if the software is written to take advantage of them all.

A less likely possibility is that your machine is maxing out in some other area and so can't utilize the full CPU availability. Perhaps it is hitting the limit of available RAM or the maximum throughput to disk. Is there a way to measure that?

My money is on thread limitations - your software is likely coded for four threads and you are just spreading them across 8 cores, resulting in a low average per core occupancy.

It is for reasons like this that I remain interested in raw GHz. At some point, you simply need more umphh per core to result in faster overall completion of the work you are doing.

My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 4 Core, Mac Pro, 3.2 GHz 8 Core, PowerMac G5 Quad, 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube, 1.2 GHz Upgrade
My iStuff: 32 GB iPhone 4, 30 GB iPod Video, 16 GB iPod Touch
My OS': Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Leopard, Mac OS 8.6, openSUSE 10.3, Win XP
I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007
QUOTE Thanks
PowerBookG4

 
PowerBookG4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 08, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,190
PowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud ofPowerBookG4 has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: Mac Pro 8x3.0ghz 12gb ram 8800GT , MBP 2.16 2GB Ram 17 inch.

PowerBookG4 is offline
Hmm, interesting. I guess final cut is coded for only 4 cores then. Hopefully an update will fix that

My Website
Blog
I love my hosting company!
I was on the M-F honor roll for Febuary:2006
QUOTE Thanks
bryphotoguy

 
bryphotoguy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 02, 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,978
bryphotoguy is just really nicebryphotoguy is just really nicebryphotoguy is just really nicebryphotoguy is just really nicebryphotoguy is just really nice
Mac Specs: Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone

bryphotoguy is offline
I am going to agree with Mac57 here. Either the app is only designed to run with four cores or there is a bottleneck somewhere else. Given the new layout of the Mac Pro, it's probably the software.
I was reading an article about this issue. If an app isn't designed to make use of all the cores, it will actually be slower than a dual core model. Encoding through iTunes is slightly faster on a Core2Duo than a Xeon Quad.
This is why I decided to only get the Quad 2.8GHz. Hopefully, the next version of Final Cut will make use of all the cores. Weird though that it doesn't. The original 8 core Mac Pro has been out for awhile.
hmmm.... Is there a preferences feature in FC? I know with Photoshop you can tell it to use spare HD's are scratch disk. Is there something disabling you from drawing more processing power to conserve energy?


January 2008 Member of the Month
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Question about using both NVidea and ATI on Mac Pro under Windows XP | Where is the best place to get ram? »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Core Duo --> Core 2 Duo Flash Fire Apple Notebooks 4 03-24-2012 11:12 AM
Why not use desktop-class Core 2's? iansltx Apple Desktops 7 02-23-2007 07:57 AM
DIY: Trick out your Intel Mini kaidomac Apple Desktops 53 02-17-2007 02:40 AM
Core Solo or Duo Pierre Apple Notebooks 5 04-21-2006 11:47 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?