| Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
|
|
Thread Tools |
![]() Member Since: Feb 04, 2008
Posts: 6
![]() |
Hi there,
I have the opportunity to upgrade my 3.0 ghz quad core mac (late 2006 model) to an 3.0ghz 8-core (last years' model, has 16gb RAM max and not the one currently in the mac store) Both have 10gb of previous generation RAM - 677 as opposed to 800MHz. I use the computer as a multimedia centre for downloading content, hosting shared files for a macbook and a pc, outputting video to 42" tv and as as a hobby I produce music and video using studio and final cut pro. I was wondering if the upgrade is really worthwhile - It will cost me about £500 - $1000. I have heard that the 8 core is not that much better if you have enoguh RAM, and that there are some new processors coming out later 2008 / early 2009 that will have a substantial edge over the current gen 8 core (bearing this in mind when considering that the one I have been offered is not the current generation one) I know that there is always something better out there - is it worth holding onto the money for a year or so beforwe upgrading? Will a 3.0ghz quad core loose much more value? Any thoughts would be much appreciated, Thanks, James |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 02, 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
|
The only time you will see a boost in performance is when you're video editing. If it is only a hobby, it's up to you. If you're willing to drop the extra cash, do it. If I was in your position, I'd stay with what you got.
Macs hold their resale value well. I would say the Pro holds its value more than most. As for the next processor... The Penryn came out a month ago, which is why the Pro was updated. A lot of people expected a 50% speed jump with the Penryn. I can't speculate. January 2008 Member of the Month |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Feb 04, 2008
Posts: 6
![]() |
What you are saying is that outside of final cut pro it won't make a difference? - Will 8 cores not allow me to mutitask more efficiently or have logic work more smoothly? Most tests that we see publish do nont tend to have decent RAM setups - does having 10 gbs RAM help aleviate any of the bandwidth issues that have been refered to with the 8 cores? |
||||
| QUOTE Thanks | |||||
![]() Member Since: Feb 02, 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
|
Sorry, I should have the most noticeable difference will be seen in Final Cut. Not all apps can make use of all 8 cores. I don't know what Logic is to say if you'll see a benefit.
Bandwidth issues? I don't know any issues. Explain.... When you work, do you come close to running out of RAM? January 2008 Member of the Month |
| QUOTE Thanks | |
![]() Member Since: Dec 18, 2005
Location: Devon, England
Posts: 2,295
![]() ![]() ![]() Mac Specs: ibook g4, imac 2ghz c2d, mbp 2.4ghz c2d - 10.5.1
|
just my little say cheers chris my website-templemurray.com professional event photography updated daily http://www.last.fm/user/christm3 mac tips n tricks - http://uk.youtube.com/christm3
|
| QUOTE Thanks | |
| Post Reply | New Thread | Subscribe |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| Who's got the most Macs? | narf1899 | Schweb's Lounge | 139 | 11-24-2012 10:53 AM |
| Mac Pro keeps crashing when using with KVM. where to start my investigation? | AlexUK | Apple Desktops | 6 | 06-20-2007 05:50 AM |
| Mac Pro: ram upgrade | Cthulhu | Apple Desktops | 12 | 06-15-2007 02:50 PM |
| Mac Pro vs. iMac (Energy use) | markw10 | Apple Desktops | 5 | 03-18-2007 08:41 PM |
| Mac Users Get More ISP Choices | schweb | Apple Rumors and Reports | 1 | 03-06-2003 10:57 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin