Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    lisamel's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 14, 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    97
    Specs:
    Mac pro 2.66 quad, Ati x1900, 2 500GB drives, 6 mb ram, dual 24"dell monitors
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    Hi,
    I've decided to get my new machine now. I know new ones are around the corner, but I need it today.
    So, after scouring ebay and apple store, I see some options.

    Is it worth the extra money for the 3.0 ove the 2.66?
    My friend has developer discount that she will use for me, so I won't be paying retail.
    Is the performance in photoshop and final cut that much better with 3.0?
    I will have at least 6 gb in whichever machine I choose.
    Thanks.

  2. #2
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    bryphotoguy's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    3,978
    Specs:
    Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
    There might be some difference. According to benchmark scores, it isn't much faster. The 3GHz will be more noticible with Final Cut but with Photoshop the will perform sorta equally.
    I get a discount at work (I realized after I bought my Mac Pro) and it is at cost. The difference will get you a free upgrade to the ATI card which is a good upgrade.

    January 2008 Member of the Month

  3. #3
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    Wilcon's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 31, 2007
    Posts
    69
    Specs:
    Mac Pro Quad Core 2.66, ATI 1900, 5 GB RAM, 750 GB Storage
    I agree with the above post. The 2.66 is a hardly noticeable speed decrease.
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.

    There are two types of IT problems in the world. PEBKAC and ID 10 T's.

  4. #4
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    lisamel's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 14, 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    97
    Specs:
    Mac pro 2.66 quad, Ati x1900, 2 500GB drives, 6 mb ram, dual 24"dell monitors
    Thanks,
    I am getting the ATI card with the 2.66. With the developer discount, it is a signifcant savings.

    Then I can sell it when the new penryns come out and they work out all the bugs!

  5. #5
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    rhcpcjg's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 24, 2007
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by lisamel View Post
    Thanks,
    I am getting the ATI card with the 2.66. With the developer discount, it is a signifcant savings.

    Then I can sell it when the new penryns come out and they work out all the bugs!
    I hope you dont regret not getting the 3.0, i regret buying the 2.0 imac instead of the 2.4... but hey! its your choice. enjoy your new mac pro

  6. #6
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    Wilcon's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 31, 2007
    Posts
    69
    Specs:
    Mac Pro Quad Core 2.66, ATI 1900, 5 GB RAM, 750 GB Storage
    With 4 cores and 2 processors the jump between the 2.66 and the 3.0 is not a significant as the one you have. With the amount of RAM and the upgraded video card except for super intense video editing the 2 systems are so close its negligible.
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.

    There are two types of IT problems in the world. PEBKAC and ID 10 T's.

  7. #7
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    sisuk's Avatar
    Member Since
    Sep 05, 2007
    Location
    Portland, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    11
    Specs:
    Mac Pro, MacBook CD
    Good Choice
    Quote Originally Posted by lisamel View Post
    Thanks,
    I am getting the ATI card with the 2.66. With the developer discount, it is a signifcant savings.

    Then I can sell it when the new penryns come out and they work out all the bugs!
    You won't regret going with the 2.66. I faced a similar dilemma when I was purchasing my Mac Pro. I did quite a bit of research, and the conclusion was the 2.66 would be more than sufficient for my needs, which don't differ from yours that much.

    I run Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, and Dreamweaver at the same time in my work. I also do a bit of video editing. The processors have never been a bottleneck for me.

    Where you do want to invest is the ram, which you said you are getting 6GB, and the HDs. For video/photo work I recommend setting up a scratch drive separate from the OS/App drive, and another drive for documents. Running them in a RAID configuration would be even better, but it costs more for all those drives obviously.

  8. #8
    2.66 or 3.0 mac pro
    lisamel's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 14, 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    97
    Specs:
    Mac pro 2.66 quad, Ati x1900, 2 500GB drives, 6 mb ram, dual 24"dell monitors
    Thank you for the replies. I have my new machine and I set everything up. I am going to install final cut tonight and check it out.
    I'm sure it will be fast enough for me. I'm not doing very heavy work yet.
    When I do, the new models will be out and I can splurge.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mac Pro 5,1 vs Mac Mini Quad i7 for Pro Tools 11
    By 13th Crowned in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-09-2015, 04:42 PM
  2. Mac Pro 2.7 8GB vs Mac Pro Retina 2.6 16GB
    By SofaKingBig in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-14-2012, 07:11 PM
  3. Mac Pro to Mac Book Pro Firewire cable
    By limu99 in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-03-2011, 10:10 AM
  4. iMac, Mac Pro or Mac Book pro; for iPhone development
    By BillyA in forum Apple Notebooks
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-18-2009, 05:23 PM
  5. Windows XP Pro, XP Pro x64, or Vista on new Mac Pro?
    By analog guy in forum Running Windows (or anything else) on your Mac
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-18-2008, 05:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •