New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus • Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts • Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

Seagate Hard Drive 300gig Question


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
rgstrdnurse
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I recently installed a Seagate 300gig internal harddrive in my G5. I was just curious as to why only 275gigs shows up. It installed easy and I just went through disk utility and it took care of it prior to using but why does it not show the entire 300gigs? Thank you! :doctor:
QUOTE Thanks
macAttack

 
macAttack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 23, 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,509
macAttack is a jewel in the roughmacAttack is a jewel in the roughmacAttack is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iBook

macAttack is offline
what do you mean by shows up? Quite often the disks are formatted less than what they say they are...just because its impossible for the company to put on exactly 300 gigs...
QUOTE Thanks
baggss

 
baggss's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 10, 2004
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 10,309
baggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond reputebaggss has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac-13" C2D Macbook-OSX 18.8.2-64Gb iPad 2-32 Gb iPhone 5-ATV 2-14Tb of Storage

baggss is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by macAttack
Quite often the disks are formatted less than what they say they are...just because its impossible for the company to put on exactly 300 gigs...
Wrong.

From HERE

"Marketing" capacity versus true capacity

Hard drive manufacturers often use the metric definition of the prefixes "giga" and "mega", whilst nearly all operating system utilities report capacities using binary definitions for the prefixes. This is largely for historical reasons, since when storage capacities started to exceed thousands of bytes, there were no standard binary prefixes. The IEC only standardized binary prefixes in 1999, so 210 (1024) bytes was called a kilobyte because 1024 is "close enough" to the metric prefix kilo, which is defined as 103 or 1000. This trend became habit and continued to be applied to the prefixes "mega," "giga," and even "tera." Obviously the discrepancy becomes much more noticeable in reported capacities in the multiple gigabyte range, and users will often notice that the volume capacity reported by their OS is significantly less than that advertised by the hard drive manufacturer. For example, a drive advertised as 200 GB can be expected to store close to 200 x 109, or 200 billion, bytes. This uses the proper SI definition of "giga," 109 and can be considered as an approximation of a gibibyte. Since utilities provided by the operating system probably define a gigabyte as 230, or 1073741824, bytes, the reported capacity of the drive will be closer to 186.26 GB, a difference of well over 7%. For this very reason, many utilities that report capacity have begun to use the aforementioned IEC standard binary prefixes (e.g. KiB, MiB, GiB) since their definitions are unambiguous.

Another side point is that many people mistakenly attribute the discrepancy in reported and advertised capacities to reserved space used for file system and partition accounting information. However, for large (several GiB) filesystems, this data rarely occupies more than several MiB, and therefore cannot possibly account for the apparent "loss" of tens of GBs.


QUOTE Thanks
macAttack

 
macAttack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 23, 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 1,509
macAttack is a jewel in the roughmacAttack is a jewel in the roughmacAttack is a jewel in the rough
Mac Specs: iBook

macAttack is offline
o i'm sorry, i should just go die in a hole for trying to be helpful and let you answer all the questions. and while i hate to sound like a child, ever heard of something called being nice?
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Hard drive question | Base Mini »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DIY: Trick out your Intel Mini kaidomac Apple Desktops 53 02-17-2007 02:40 AM
upgrading the internal hard drive in an old iMac Conrad D Apple Desktops 6 05-06-2006 08:13 AM
Weird question about iPod hard drive shane12341234 iPod Hardware and Accessories 9 03-25-2006 07:58 PM
Question about partitioned hard drive creativ73 Apple Desktops 1 12-06-2005 10:58 AM
Hard Drive not being recognized soxrguy Schweb's Lounge 3 06-13-2005 09:43 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?