Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    randomfactor's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 07, 2005
    Location
    Around London
    Posts
    233
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 17" i7 Unibody, HK Speakers and a Wacom A5 Wide tablet
    Dual Core 2.3 or Dual Proc 2.7 G5
    What would br the faster out of the two G5, as I am looking at getting one from the Apple Refurb Store (anyone ever bought from there before?). They both have 512 ram which I'll just have to upgrade and 250 gig hard drives but I have a firewire 800/400 drive to add. I am going to mainly use this mac for After Effects and other animation, which would be the better suited.
    Man Fears Time but Time Fears the Pyramids

  2. #2

    coach_z's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 23, 2004
    Location
    North NJ
    Posts
    3,169
    Specs:
    i dont have no mac's
    refurbs come out of their factory with the same expectation of performance as every new mac that comes off the line. only difference is you might have a pre-made scratch on the case or something. so basically what i am saying is that the refurbs are just like new, but used, with the same warantee as the new machines.

    well picking between the two may become a crap shoot. the intel machine will need to emulate aftereffects under rosetta and that will be noticably slower. there also appears to be a degredation in performance under rosetta as well...read this: http://www.adobe.com/products/pdfs/intelmacsupport.pdf . PPC might be faster but adobe may release a new line of products by years end which will be universal.

    if you need to buy now, i'd go with ppc.
    -chris
    MoTM honor roll...
    when?
    i dont remember

  3. #3


    Member Since
    May 16, 2005
    Location
    Wasilla, Alaska
    Posts
    416
    Specs:
    New MACBOOK
    Quote Originally Posted by coach_z
    refurbs come out of their factory with the same expectation of performance as every new mac that comes off the line. only difference is you might have a pre-made scratch on the case or something. so basically what i am saying is that the refurbs are just like new, but used, with the same warantee as the new machines.

    well picking between the two may become a crap shoot. the intel machine will need to emulate aftereffects under rosetta and that will be noticably slower. there also appears to be a degredation in performance under rosetta as well...read this: http://www.adobe.com/products/pdfs/intelmacsupport.pdf . PPC might be faster but adobe may release a new line of products by years end which will be universal.

    if you need to buy now, i'd go with ppc.
    -chris

    I thought powermacs were still PPC as of today?

  4. #4

    EDIT-XTREEM's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 27, 2005
    Location
    In the mac store and at home on my iMac
    Posts
    1,165
    they are
    Mac Pro (Early 2009) 8 Core 2.26 GHz, 6 GB Ram, 640 GB Drive. Dell 2408WFP.

  5. #5

    randomfactor's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 07, 2005
    Location
    Around London
    Posts
    233
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 17" i7 Unibody, HK Speakers and a Wacom A5 Wide tablet
    Quote Originally Posted by hondagus87
    I thought powermacs were still PPC as of today?
    They are its a PowerPC Dual Core processor.
    Man Fears Time but Time Fears the Pyramids

  6. #6

    randomfactor's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 07, 2005
    Location
    Around London
    Posts
    233
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 17" i7 Unibody, HK Speakers and a Wacom A5 Wide tablet
    Quote Originally Posted by coach_z
    refurbs come out of their factory with the same expectation of performance as every new mac that comes off the line. only difference is you might have a pre-made scratch on the case or something. so basically what i am saying is that the refurbs are just like new, but used, with the same warantee as the new machines.

    well picking between the two may become a crap shoot. the intel machine will need to emulate aftereffects under rosetta and that will be noticably slower. there also appears to be a degredation in performance under rosetta as well...read this: http://www.adobe.com/products/pdfs/intelmacsupport.pdf . PPC might be faster but adobe may release a new line of products by years end which will be universal.

    if you need to buy now, i'd go with ppc.
    -chris

    Cheers for the quick reply but the question was about PowerPC Powermac G5 and whether to go for dual core or dual processor which are still available for the PowerPC Powermac g5.
    Man Fears Time but Time Fears the Pyramids

  7. #7


    Member Since
    Nov 24, 2005
    Posts
    749
    Specs:
    Powerbook G4/ 15.2"/ 1.67 ghz/ 2 gb RAM/ ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 (128 mb RAM)/ 100 gb hdd@ 5400 RPM
    I would definitely go for the 2.3 GHz Dual-Core. It has faster RAM, faster bus speeds, PCI-E over AGP for graphics, better graphics cards, and faster expansion slots.
    I'd use Windows... but I like the Mac OS more.

  8. #8
    bfx
    Guest
    Tough choice.

    Don't know about your specific 3D app but Lightwave renders on dual core 2.3 vs. dual cpu 2.7 are neck and neck in most cases.

    Rarely more than a couple of percentage points difference either way. Depends on scene.

    Main advantages of the 2.3 dual core is it's a newer platform with PCI Express. While that means it will have bus expansion available longer it also means older bus expansion cards won't work.

    So if you already have expansion cards you plan on reusing that's something to consider.

    And there aren't that many bus expansion options available yet, although more are being added.

    Factor in planned release of Intel based PowerMacs and that Apple seems to be reducing the number of models in individual lines (only two Intel Minis, jump from 2.3 dual core to 2.5 Quad w/o a single dual core 2.5 model) and it's even more difficult to decide.


    Considering the dual cpu models are no longer made (and therefore the components will probaly have more time on them) I'm leaning toward the 2.3.

    bfx

  9. #9

    randomfactor's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 07, 2005
    Location
    Around London
    Posts
    233
    Specs:
    MacBook Pro 17" i7 Unibody, HK Speakers and a Wacom A5 Wide tablet
    Quote Originally Posted by bfx
    Tough choice.

    Don't know about your specific 3D app but Lightwave renders on dual core 2.3 vs. dual cpu 2.7 are neck and neck in most cases.

    Rarely more than a couple of percentage points difference either way. Depends on scene.

    Main advantages of the 2.3 dual core is it's a newer platform with PCI Express. While that means it will have bus expansion available longer it also means older bus expansion cards won't work.

    So if you already have expansion cards you plan on reusing that's something to consider.

    And there aren't that many bus expansion options available yet, although more are being added.

    Factor in planned release of Intel based PowerMacs and that Apple seems to be reducing the number of models in individual lines (only two Intel Minis, jump from 2.3 dual core to 2.5 Quad w/o a single dual core 2.5 model) and it's even more difficult to decide.


    Considering the dual cpu models are no longer made (and therefore the components will probaly have more time on them) I'm leaning toward the 2.3.

    bfx
    From that comment is there a big step from the 2.3 DC to the 2.5 Quad (and the the quad 2x 2.5 DC?)
    Man Fears Time but Time Fears the Pyramids

  10. #10
    bfx
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by randomfactor
    From that comment is there a big step from the 2.3 DC to the 2.5 Quad (and the the quad 2x 2.5 DC?)
    Yes. <--- click

    The 2.3 would be a bit faster than the reference 2.0 system - but less so than the 2.3 to 2.0 ratio might seem to indicate.

    Considering refurbed prices $2149 vs. $2799 at the Apple Store the Quad is definitely worth considering.

    Reading further into the article it's noted that Intel Powermacs will need more than dual 3.6 ghz Xeons to equal a G5 Quad's raw speed.

    So perhaps the whole Intel factor can be disregarded.

    Hard to say unless one knows Apple's plans for ultimate performance in an Intel PowerMac.

    And I suspect even those may change from whatever is currently planned as Mac power users demand more performance.

    bfx



    bfx

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. G5 dual proc Memory Upgade- all slots identical?
    By lgreen11 in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-21-2010, 06:03 PM
  2. 2ghz dual core vs 2.5ghz dual processor
    By CanadianFawkes in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-04-2008, 02:37 PM
  3. Dual core Vs Dual Procs
    By inflexion in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-01-2005, 12:06 PM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-12-2004, 02:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •