New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

advice needed: 2009 pro vs mini


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
d0ubledown

 
Member Since: Jan 02, 2014
Posts: 3
d0ubledown is on a distinguished road

d0ubledown is offline
Good morning and happy new year all!

Looking for advice on a new work station for my digital photography. im contemplating between:

-2009 mac pro 2.66 quad

or

-current mini. most likely i5, but could swing the i7 model if i can get a bit of a discount through work.

My budget is approx $750~850. I've got a pair of cinema displays that i will be using so no imacs.

The quad would ideally be setup with min 6gb ram, hopefully 8 or more. HD would be min 640 stock config.

The mini would hopefully have ram upgraded to 8GB.

My use for this new workstation is for heavy digital image processing through LR4. May try aperture. Between 8-1200 12MP RAW file exports every few weekends. Plus a few dozen hi-res retouching through PS CS5. Probably a few ~5min video edits here n there through imovie or equivalent.

Ive always had a thing for pro workstations. My previous tower was a hopped up G4 dual 1.8 w/ sonnet processors. That has recently died, and have been using a macbook 2,1 for my imaging needs. Obviously either option will be a huge performance jump. I just want to make sure im buying the proper machine for long term use and reliability. I dont replace main computers every 3 years...more like 10 (they're macs after all!)

my reasoning for each option.

mac pro:
- Robust design and accessibility. Expandability, can upgrade to better processors & much more ram down the road. Options for upgraded graphics (although the work i'll be doing wont necessarily exploit higher end cards?)
- port options. i've got scanners, and printers + external drives.
- optical drives (yes i still use these)
- only concern is higher power use, operating temps ( i like to keep my machines on 24/7, just displays off) and perhaps failing components, no warranty.


mini:
- processor power. hoping for the i7 as it will hopefully serve me for many years to come, as is.
- small form factor.
- new w/ warranty and can purchase apple care up to 1 year later.
- only concerns are heat from such a small form factor ( i hear these things get pretty hot during continuous hi load?), and upgradability. plus, no optical drive so an external would be needed.

So what say ye experts? still definitely on the fence with a slight edge for the pro...

much thanks!
lee
QUOTE Thanks
harryb2448

 
harryb2448's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 18,386
harryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i5 2.7GHz, 16GB memory, OS 10.10.1

harryb2448 is offline
Personally, as a former Mac Pro user when doing photography and graphic design, I would go with the Pro with 16GB of memory. You can upgrade the gfx card if you wish, use an SSD and pop two optical drives in, maybe even a blu-ray.

Whilst coming up to its fifth birthday the 2009 Mac Pro 2.66GHz returns a Geekbench score of 14,458 compared to the latest Mini's 11,759. If the pocket runs to it, a 2010 2.66GHz Mac Pro would be even better with a score of 20,048 nearly twice that of the Mini.

The only thing lacking in either Mac Pro would be USB3, however a reputable Mac compatible PCI-E card such as a Sonnet would fix that.

Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!
QUOTE Thanks
d0ubledown

 
Member Since: Jan 02, 2014
Posts: 3
d0ubledown is on a distinguished road

d0ubledown is offline
thanks for the reply harry. yes, the plan is to eventually get up to 16GB ram, but I will have to make do with 6 in the pro for the time being...

where did you find those Geekbench scores? are those for the quad core or the 8 core? the geekbench scores i found posted much lower numbers, and much lower than the current mac mini gets:

2009 2.66 quad:

model:"Mac Pro (Early 2009)" platform:"Mac" processor:"Intel Xeon W3520" frequency:2670 bits:32 - Geekbench Search - Geekbench Browser

2013 mini i7:

model:"Mac mini (Late 2012)" platform:"Mac" processor:"Intel Core i7-3720QM" frequency:2600 bits:32 - Geekbench Search - Geekbench Browser

or am i reading the wrong scores?

the mini seems to have much better geekbench scores, not surprisingly as its current technology, but i thought the 09 quad would have held its own a bit better...
QUOTE Thanks
harryb2448

 
harryb2448's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 18,386
harryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i5 2.7GHz, 16GB memory, OS 10.10.1

harryb2448 is offline
Personally use Mactracker. The GeekBench for the 2009 2.66GHz is 8144 for the single core and 14,458 for the twin. The first link in your post talks about 32bit. All Mac Pros after the Models 1.1 and 2.1, 2006/2007, are 64bit architecture.

Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Drivers for Mac to support ASUS monitor? | Moving to Eastern Europe »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mac Pro 1,1 advice please - College Student carusone93 Apple Desktops 3 11-21-2012 12:11 AM
Advice needed on my 2010 Mac Mini.... geek71 OS X - Operating System 1 01-29-2012 11:32 PM
13" MacBook pro (2009) 500 GB hard drive upgrade advice joldekop Apple Notebooks 1 08-24-2011 03:57 PM
13" MacBook pro (2009) 500 GB hard drive upgrade advice joldekop Apple Notebooks 1 08-24-2011 02:26 PM
Advice about turning my "damaged" Macbook Pro 250 gb (2009) HD into an external HD? Jbrhill Apple Notebooks 2 04-04-2010 08:14 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?