New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus • Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts • Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

iMac Recommendation--- Help


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
jwm9289

 
Member Since: Dec 30, 2013
Posts: 3
jwm9289 is on a distinguished road

jwm9289 is offline
Hello,

Thanks in advance for the recommendations. I'm looking to purchase my first mac computer. ( I own 2, 3 and mini iPads and iPhone 5) So i'm a little familiar with Apple.

I want the 27" iMac, I mainly use Adobe Photo Shop CS6 and Lightroom 5, Surf the net, emails and spreadsheet. No gaming or movies.

I was looking at the i7 version, 16GB.

My question should i go with 1tb Fusion or 256 Flash and why?

Should i buy direct from apple or ?

Any other recommendation would be great.

Thanks, Jim
QUOTE Thanks
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 26,238
pigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 13" MB 2.4ghz, 2gig ram, OS 10.7.5

pigoo3 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwm9289 View Post
My question should i go with 1tb Fusion or 256 Flash and why?
What are your storage needs? After you install all the apps you need...will 256gig be enough for other "stuff" (movies, music, photos, videos, files from CS6)?

The flash drive will be faster (opening files & apps, booting the computer, saving files)...but less storage than the 1 Terabyte drive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwm9289 View Post
Should i buy direct from apple or ?
Apple. You really don't save much money or get any additional benefits buying somewhere else. Unless the other stores are more convenient.

- Nick

- Computer slow, too many "beachballs", read this: Beachballs
- Computer seems slower than it used to? Read this for some speedup tips: Speedup
- Almost full hard drive? Some solutions. Out of Space
- Apple Battery Info. Battery
QUOTE Thanks
jwm9289

 
Member Since: Dec 30, 2013
Posts: 3
jwm9289 is on a distinguished road

jwm9289 is offline
No movies or games, just photo's. I would rather go with the 1tb Fusion.
QUOTE Thanks
harryb2448

 
harryb2448's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 17,252
harryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i5 2.7GHz OS X.9.4 and OS X.10

harryb2448 is offline
The 256GB flash will be nowhere big enough for photo storage.

Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!
QUOTE Thanks
jwm9289

 
Member Since: Dec 30, 2013
Posts: 3
jwm9289 is on a distinguished road

jwm9289 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryb2448 View Post
The 256GB flash will be nowhere big enough for photo storage.
My biggest worry is freezing up or running slow when using photoshop. I was told by apple to go with the 256 flash over the 1tb fusion and this didn't seem correct to me.
QUOTE Thanks
harryb2448

 
harryb2448's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 17,252
harryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i5 2.7GHz OS X.9.4 and OS X.10

harryb2448 is offline
You do have the option of going with a 512GB SSD but that comes without the 1TB SATA drive.


Configure - Apple Store (U.S.)

Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!
QUOTE Thanks
pavinder

 
Member Since: Jan 16, 2009
Posts: 23
pavinder is on a distinguished road

pavinder is offline
I'm in a similar situation, and have received 3 different explanations from different Apple Store staff members at various stores. They lead to 3 very different conclusions, and obviously they can't all be correct.

The first explanation is that when you open an image in Photoshop the file will be loaded into the SSD part of a fusion drive, so all processing will be much faster than if you had the standard drive. These people said that there wouldn't be any advantage at all (for Photoshop or Lightroom work) of having an SSD drive instead of the fusion drive.

---> Their recommendation: fusion drive

A second group of staff in Apple stores said this is not the case at all! They said only the apps, system files and regularly used files are processed in the SSD part of the fusion drive, and that an image file being used by Photoshop will be loaded in RAM (so whether I have a fusion drive, an SSD or a standard HDD is irrelevant).

They said the only advantage (for Photoshop) of getting an SSD would be if all my image files were stored on it. The drive would only be used during opening/saving anyway. So according to them, if using externals for storage (as I do), there is absolutely no need to get a SSD - the "SSD part" of the fusion drive will be enough.

---> Their recommendation: (mostly) fusion drive

A third group of staff disagreed with both of the above! They said that once the app (Photoshop) was open, absolutely everything would be done in RAM (both the image file and the running of the app) - they recommended I save money and just buy the standard drive. They said that aside from file opening/saving speed, neither the SSD nor the fusion drive would make "any significant difference" compared to the standard drive, as both the image and the app will now depend solely on the speed of RAM processing.

---> Their recommendation: standard HDD drive

Obviously these 3 different views cannot all be true. If anyone could explain which of the above explanations is correct, it would be much appreciated!
QUOTE Thanks
pavinder

 
Member Since: Jan 16, 2009
Posts: 23
pavinder is on a distinguished road

pavinder is offline
This from the Adobe support forums - suggesting that you don't need either an SSD or fusion drive to get the best processing speeds:
Quote:
Installing Photoshop on a solid-state disk (SSD) allows Photoshop to launch fast, probably in less than a second. But that speedier startup is the only time savings you experience. That’s the only time when much data is read from the SSD.
To gain the greatest benefit from an SSD, use it as the scratch disk.
Note: Adding RAM to improve performance is more cost effective than purchasing an SSD.
QUOTE Thanks
pavinder

 
Member Since: Jan 16, 2009
Posts: 23
pavinder is on a distinguished road

pavinder is offline
Very helpful thread on this topic:

Photographer buying 27-inch iMac - which model? - MacRumors Forums
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Apple’s new ‘overpriced’ $10,000 Mac Pro is $2,000 cheaper than the equivalent Window | Disabling a Late 2012 iMac 27" display »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Help my iMac Intel HD issues! MWithersIT Apple Desktops 9 01-13-2012 09:52 AM
iMac: replace HD or time for new iMac? n8cas Apple Desktops 23 12-31-2011 12:44 PM
Does a 17" imac g5 logic board fit a 20" imac g5? 568129 Apple Desktops 9 12-06-2011 02:13 PM
24" iMac Aluminum not starting l33tloser Apple Desktops 4 09-17-2009 03:44 PM
The New iMac (merged) EDIT-XTREEM Apple Desktops 7 07-21-2006 04:29 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?