Mac Specs: PowerMac G5 Dual 2GHz (June 2004), 2.5GB, Airport, black 5G iPod 30GB, white MacBook 2.0 2GB
Performance-wise, the PowerMac is still faster than the Intel iMac, but I would say that the iMac (G5 or Intel) is better value for money, as you get the whole package with screen, BT and Airport.
As always, it depends on what you want to do with it...
Performance-wise, the PowerMac is still faster than the Intel iMac, but I would say that the iMac (G5 or Intel) is better value for money, as you get the whole package with screen, BT and Airport.
As always, it depends on what you want to do with it...
i will be using it for - school work, music, dvds, internet, aMSN, google earth, dreamweaver, office etc..
and it would depend on what powermac g5 you would have. but yes.. for what you want to do..
BUT there is something you need to keep in mind on this..
UNIVESAL software.. will not be available for at least 6 months or more.. they will run under rosetta.. but will not run natively.. in that case.. so they will run under emulation and may not runn to its full potential. i would get the imac G5..
something else to think about.
and it would depend on what powermac g5 you would have. but yes.. for what you want to do..
BUT there is something you need to keep in mind on this..
UNIVESAL software.. will not be available for at least 6 months or more.. they will run under rosetta.. but will not run natively.. in that case.. so they will run under emulation and may not runn to its full potential. i would get the imac G5..
something else to think about.
ok thanks for that, and thanks to all the other sites and replies. keep them coming. cheers chris tm :mac:
Mac Specs: PowerMac G5 Dual 2GHz (June 2004), 2.5GB, Airport, black 5G iPod 30GB, white MacBook 2.0 2GB
Seeing the actual price of the 20" iMac G5 ($1499,-), I would say go for it. It's a lot of value for the money, you get the whole package with a nice 20" screen, 250GB HD, Superdrive, Airport and BT. And everything running natively on it, no Rosetta emulation.
Add about $100,- for 1GB of memory, and you will have a really nice setup that easily fit your needs, and is fast.
And no trouble with Rev.A hardware issues, which Apple (and other companies) seem to be unable to avoid. :cool:
Unless you're planning on running super high end pro apps, go with the iMac...overall it's a far better value, and in many cases, faster than the Powermac.
Hard to say that, since I have a dual core Powermac, but it's the truth.
Mac Specs: 1.67GHz/15" PowerBook G4 | 1.6GHz Power Mac G5 | iSight
The better value for the money would be the iMac by far.
And something to keep in mind.... "faster" does not always equate to "better".
__________________
__________________________________________________ Posting and YOU|Forum Community Guidelines|The Apple Product Cycle mac: a waterproof raincoat made of rubberized fabric MAC: a data communication protocol sub-layer, also known as the Media Access Control Mac: a brand name which covers several lines of personal computers designed, developed, and marketed by Apple Inc. Even more common errors in English
Hey guys, i have almost the same question but a lil bit different.
i m learning editing on FCP. so what system do u guys recommend to me.
i divided the scale as BEGINNER, INTERMEDIATE and ADVANCE.
So for ADVANCE EDITING WHAT SYSTEM DO U GUYS RECOMMEND? which will even help me in future too.
One more question?
What is the difference between PANTHER 10.3 and TIGER X 10.4. are they the same of different software. is the 10.4 advance from panther 10.3 or something else
PowerMac is faster, but the iMac is a better deal for the speed you get! However when intel PM come, they better really step it up, because the speed from G5 iMac/PB G4 to MacBook Pro and iMac intel is ALOT!