New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

2.7 GHz dual core i7 vs 2.0 GHz quad core i7. and different graphics cards


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
Spooky

 
Spooky's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 11, 2012
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 9
Spooky is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Mac Mini//2.7 GHz dual-core i7//8 GB RAM//Mac OS X Lion

Spooky is offline
Note that this is a. follow-on to a 2011 thread qsking a similar question....
basically, 2.7 GHz dual core i7 vs 2.0 GHz quad core i7. I have a few more
differences to add to that, however....

I am looking at two Mac minis. The first is (upgraded to) a 2.7 GHz dual core, at
Configure - Apple Store (U.S.)
and the second is a server with a 2.0 GHz quad core at
Configure - Apple Store (U.S.)

The first obviously has a faster cpu speed, but is only a dual core.
The second, more expensive one, has twice the disk space (and faster drives),
but the sales guy said the first's graphics card is much better.

Money is a real issue. I can probably afford either, but the server would
leave me really tight for the month. (I live on disability).

So, basically, I'm looking for suggestions between these two.

Thanks,
--jim
QUOTE Thanks
Shad martin

 
Member Since: May 14, 2012
Posts: 2
Shad martin is on a distinguished road

Shad martin is offline
I bought the 2.5 with the ATi card and I love it but I also do a lot of editing with AVID media composer, After Effects and Photoshop. The ATi card is going to be faster at rendering GFX even though the 2.0 has way better has bench marks. You can always add a second faster drive for the cost of the drive, an 80.00 ifixit HDD Upgrade kit and 45 minutes. If you are not doing anything with video or photo editing then go with the server.
QUOTE Thanks
Spooky

 
Spooky's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 11, 2012
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 9
Spooky is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Mac Mini//2.7 GHz dual-core i7//8 GB RAM//Mac OS X Lion

Spooky is offline
Yeah, the graphics card was, in the end, THE major issue.

Photography is one of my hobbies, and I WILL be doing video...
no doubt about that. :-)

The 2.5 GHz (with the 2.7 GHz upgrade) won. I would have
posted a follow-up, but there was a problem with my login
(my real login/passwd was being rejected...then I found
out that when I changed my nickname here, it also CHANGED
my username...). I basically gave up when even the reset
failed to work.....

I JUST finally got it reset......

Thanks,
--jim
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« 2006 IMAC (MA200B/A) utterly lifeless. whats likely to be wrong? | Imac wireless issue »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?