Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

apple processor speed vs. pc's


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
j-swoll

 
Member Since: Nov 19, 2005
Posts: 11
j-swoll is an unknown at this point

j-swoll is offline
whats the difference? ive been wondering because most macs, aside from the power macs, processor speeds are barely over 2ghz while alot of pc processors are 3 or 4 ghz. do the macs and pcs have different ratings for their processors or what.

thanx
QUOTE Thanks
Aptmunich

 
Aptmunich's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 09, 2004
Location: Munich
Posts: 9,075
Aptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant futureAptmunich has a brilliant future
Mac Specs: Aluminium Macbook 2.4 Ghz 4GB RAM, SSD 24" Samsung Display, iPhone 4, iPad 2

Aptmunich is offline
Yes they do - but from next year onwards they'll use the same chips as everyone else...
QUOTE Thanks
j-swoll

 
Member Since: Nov 19, 2005
Posts: 11
j-swoll is an unknown at this point

j-swoll is offline
so a 2ghz mac processor would be equivelent to what speed pc processor?
QUOTE Thanks
surfwax95

 
surfwax95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 27, 2005
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 2,410
surfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud ofsurfwax95 has much to be proud of
Mac Specs: 15" Powerbook G4 • 24" iMac • iPhone 3Gs

surfwax95 is offline
Yes, due to the architecture used inside the chip, the actual performance may differ from a competing manufacturer's chip with the same clock speed.
This is why AMD stopped marketing based on these clock speeds. They are now referred to as 1000,2000, etc...

As for your question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by j-swoll
so a 2ghz mac processor would be equivelent to what speed pc processor?
One would have to know what "pc" processor you're talking about. IBM makes Apple's processors (PowerPC), and are generally comparable to "faster" processors made by Intel. So, to humor your question I would say a 2Ghz PowerPC G5 would be comparable to an AMD Athlon64 4000, or an Intel Pentium 4 HT running at 2.7Ghz. I don't know much about these processors (which is why I'm on a MAC forum), but the stats are comparable.

Hope that answers your question. :mac:

I try to Command+Shift+/ when I can.
They're - Their - There | Two - Too - To | You're - Your | MAC - Mac
I was on the M-F honor roll for October, 2006.
QUOTE Thanks
lil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

I'm sure a quick search will avail some great posts about this.

Please don't compare apples and oranges -- they don't have many similarities :flower:

Something I wrote a little while ago:

http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/sho...454#post164454

Vicky
QUOTE Thanks
maz94protege

 
maz94protege's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 09, 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 514
maz94protege will become famous soon enough
Mac Specs: MacbookPro 15.4, 2.2ghz i7 (Late 2011), Macbook 1,1 1.83ghz CoreDuo

maz94protege is offline
Actually Motorola Makes the G Proccessor. You can search on Yahoo.com for APPLE news, and you will read up on alot of different articles on it. I never knew Motorola made the processors, but i just learned it. Cool stuff!
QUOTE Thanks
lil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Well, Motorola made the m68k series for the original 68k Macintoshes, better the devil you know etc! e.g.:

Macintosh 128K/Plus etc: 68000
Macintosh II/LC etc: 68020
Macintosh IIfx/Colour Classic etc.: 68030
Macintosh Quadra/Centris series: 68040 (some were 68LC040 - sans FPU models)

No Mac used the 68060. In fact the only computer that used the 68060 that also used the 68k series was the Commodore Amiga. For a while (say till mid 1996) it was actually faster to have a 66MHz 68060 Amiga emulating a Macintosh than having a PPC Macintosh!! (I'm not kidding, the 68060 was superscalar and didn't have the overhead of emulating the 68k that PPC did).

Anyway...

Then came the Apple, Motorola and IBM alliance to produce the PowerPC. The result was the 601. This, with the 603(e), 604(e), G3 (750 series) and G4 (7400 series) was produced by Motorola.

In 1995/1996 an attempt was made to develop something calle the CHRP (Common Hardware Reference Platform), which was an attempt to standardise the PPC architecture, the main resulf of this was the Tanzania platform which many Mac clones used. However CHRP failed, meaning manufacturers such as PIOS and BeBox cancelled their hardware projects. CHRP wasn't just for Macs of course, it was intended for other platforms such as PPC Linux and even the venerable Amiga.

Motorola failed in producing its planned G5 which is when Apple handed the baton to IBM to develop it. The G5 is a bit different from the previous PowerPC chips and has its roots in the POWER-4 processor.

Motorola spun off its semiconductor division and is now called Freescale.

So the Mac has a history of using Motorola chips, one of the big three (potentially four) in the early days: Intel, MOS and Motorola and the 4th at a pinch being Zilog in terms of personal computer processors.

So there you go - some more history
QUOTE Thanks
mynameis

 
Member Since: Sep 30, 2004
Posts: 3,378
mynameis is just really nicemynameis is just really nicemynameis is just really nicemynameis is just really nice

mynameis is offline
The average Turion/Pentium-M/Celeron-M only runs around 1.3Ghz-1.6Ghz, same clock speed range that that the mobile G4 processors are running.

Even the high end AMD processors barely run over 2Ghz.

I have never seen a 4ghz processor.
QUOTE Thanks
sevenhelmet

 
sevenhelmet's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 12, 2005
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 538
sevenhelmet is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Aluminum Macbook 2.4Ghz; Powermac G5 2.3Ghz dual

sevenhelmet is offline
In short, it's not the clock speed, it's what you do with it!

I'd rather have mmy two 2.3 Ghz PPCs than any other processor on the market right now, (with the exception of the faster and dual-core G5s) but that's just me.

"Luck favors the prepared"
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« New iMac 20" vs. PB 17" | buying an imac g5. »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Beatles sue Apple over iPod, iTunes Murlyn Apple Rumors and Reports 52 05-24-2006 10:57 AM
Scared for my iBooks sake! X Im just meE o Apple Notebooks 27 12-19-2005 11:41 AM
Done Deal - Apple converts to x86 Intel falltime Apple Rumors and Reports 180 06-07-2005 07:20 PM
Dvorak: Apple to go Intel within 18 Months schweb Apple Rumors and Reports 48 04-03-2005 06:04 PM
Apple Stock WilliS Schweb's Lounge 4 10-15-2004 01:13 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?