Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Dual 2.3 > Dual Core 2.0?
    :p Bought a 2.3Ghz DP PowerMac last month (Sept 7th) and Apple just released their new kit with PCIe and DDR2. PCIe is my main motivaion at the moment for thinking of 'switching'.

    My PM 2.3 has 1.5Gb of RAM and a GeForce 6800 GT. I was thinking of ebaying it (actually i might already have sold it) and then putting the money to a Dual Core 2.0 system with PCIe/DDR2 ect (spec it up a little of course) and i dont lose any money and gain PCIe so i can add a nice 7800GTX when im a bit richer

    Does this make sense? Im thinking that the Dual Core 2.0 should be just as good as the Dual Processor 2.3Ghz with it being on the die and not two seperate units.


  2. #2
    This is a hotly contested issue for sure.

    IMO, the Dual 2.3 will beat the Dual-core 2.0, whether a Dual-core 2.3 will match up is as yet not quite know.

    However from what I have heard from video editing professionals (Apple accredited Video Solutions experts), the performance of the Dual core 2.3 to the Dual-processor 2.3 is certainly the same, with one saying that it was discernably faster when using Final Cut Pro on the dual-core 2.3s. This may be to do with the new DDR-2 memory architecture, amongst other changes beyond the transition from 970FX to 970MP.

    Whether you wish to go from the PCI-X based Dual 2.3 to a PCI-E DualCore 2.0 is a matter of whether the drop in performance is a big one or not, and whether you could accept that for the gains in PCI express compatibility, faster RAM etc.

    Personally, if I had a Dual 2.3, I'd ideally want the Dual-core 2.3, but then it is a case of what you appreciate most.

    You can read more here: (there are other bits in the post but you should be able to pick out the dual-core vs. dual-processor arguments)

    As for the 'Quad-Core' G5 vs. Dual-processor G5 2.7; I have no comments from anyone as no one I have contacts with has used one, I do know that the video guys are very happy with the Dual-core systems they have seen (2.0s and 2.3s) and view them as a decent upgrade.

    Vicky :flower:

  3. #3

    ldjalal's Avatar
    Member Since
    Oct 04, 2005
    I've read a recent review that the new dual core 2.3Ghz beats the previous dual 2.5Ghz models by a slight margin. I dont know if its true for the DC 2.0 vs. D2.3 matchup though.

  4. #4

    Avid6eek's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 13, 2005
    Albany, NY
    What do you do with your PowerMac? If the tasks you perform are memory or graphics intensive, then the new PowerMac will perform better for your situation. If processing power is what you need, then the dual processor system you have right now will be faster.
    Desktop Specs: Core 2 Quad Q6600@ 4.0Ghz | Asus P5E X38 Motherboard | 4GB PC8000 DDRII | EVGA GeForce 8800GTX | CL x-Fi Fatal1ty | 4 x Hitachi 73GB 15,000rpm SAS HDs (RAID 0) | Adaptec 3805 SAS Controller | Dual Sony 16X DVD-RWs | Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW 24" LCD | Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Speakers

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Dual CPU or Dual Core
    By pab_gm in forum Schweb's Lounge
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 03:29 AM
  2. 2ghz dual core vs 2.5ghz dual processor
    By CanadianFawkes in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-04-2008, 03:37 PM
  3. Dual Core 2.3 or Dual Proc 2.7 G5
    By randomfactor in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-23-2006, 08:20 PM
  4. Dual Core or Dual Processor
    By dwd3885 in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-02-2005, 04:33 AM
  5. Dual core Vs Dual Procs
    By inflexion in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-01-2005, 01:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts