01-14-2011, 03:46 PM #1
"Harpertown" Dual Quad 3.0 vs. "Nehalem" Dual Quad 2.26?
- Member Since
- Apr 24, 2010
Well the title says it all. What is the performance comparison between a dual quad (8 core) 3.0 GHZ older mac pro "Harpertown" vs. a newer "Nehalem"/ "Gainstown" that is running slower with dual quad processors (8 core) at 2.26 GHZ?
I would be using this for Final Cut Pro/ Video editing and for rendering with Apple Motion.
I have a dual quad 2.26 Nehalem with tons of memory and it does not quite shred the video editing, I am wondering if a major increase in processor speed to 3.0 would improve things. Yet the older processors lack HT right?
Also I have access to cheap dual quad 3.0s ($1500 or so).
So just asking for your opinions out there.
01-14-2011, 04:06 PM #2
01-14-2011, 04:45 PM #3
- Member Since
- Nov 28, 2007
- Nambucca Heads Australia
- Imac 27", i7 3.5GHz, 3TB Fusion drive, 32GB memory, macOS Sierra.
Further Geekbench reports the Harpertown 3.0GHzreturns a score of 7977 compared to the Gainestown 2.26GHz score of 11803.
Stick with the 2.26GHz machine or even better if they are available, go up to the Gainestown 2.66GHz processors.Hang on to those original install discs like grim death! Using OS X.7 or later make a bootable USB thumb drive before running Installer!
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By tallguyg53 in forum Apple DesktopsReplies: 1Last Post: 05-27-2014, 06:56 PM
By ronin67 in forum Apple DesktopsReplies: 1Last Post: 07-27-2010, 09:35 AM
By lihomephotos in forum Apple DesktopsReplies: 13Last Post: 12-24-2009, 07:22 PM
By canosgmk in forum OS X - Operating SystemReplies: 4Last Post: 12-22-2009, 07:38 PM
By lse123 in forum Apple DesktopsReplies: 5Last Post: 12-11-2008, 06:36 AM