New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

MacBook Pro to Mac Mini - Video Upgrade?


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
TracyE

 
Member Since: Feb 07, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
TracyE is on a distinguished road

TracyE is offline
I am running an older MacBook Pro (2GHz Intel Core Duo w/ 2GB RAM) and am replacing it with the latest Mac Mini (2.53GHz Intel Core 2 Duo w/ 4 GB RAM.) I always run the book closed with an external monitor, so I have no need for portability.

My only concern is the video performance:

MacBook Pro = RadeonX1600, 128 VRAM, dedicated memory
Mac Mini = GeForce 9400M, 256MB shared memory

The footnote on the shared RAM reads: Memory available to Mac OS X may vary depending on graphics needs. Minimum graphics memory usage is 256MB

It seems like more shared VRAM would be better than less dedicated. This is my home machine, but I do plenty of PhotoShop, Final Cut and music production.

So what do you think? Is this an upgrade, downgrade, sidegrade?
QUOTE Thanks
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 27,384
pigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 13" MB 2.4ghz, 2gig ram, OS 10.7.5

pigoo3 is offline
Here is what Apple says:

Apple - MacBook Pro - Graphics - Even faster graphics processing.

Click on the link...scroll down the page a little. You will see a box that says, "Integrated Graphics Performance"...then you'll see a link for "View Performance Chart"...click on that link.

The chart says that the 9400m graphics is up to 6.1x faster than the older x3100 graphics. The x3100 graphics I believe is better than the x1600 graphics...so I would say that it is safe to assume that going from the x1600 to 9400m is an upgrade.

Also consider that the dedicated x1600 graphics hardware is about 3 years old...and the integrated 9400m graphics is much newer. Video hardware advances very rapidly...so 3 years difference is big.

Finally...you are probably going from a slower CPU MacBook Pro to a faster CPU Mac-Mini...which should help as well.

Hope this helps,

- Nick

- Computer slow, too many "beachballs", read this: Beachballs
- Computer seems slower than it used to? Read this for some speedup tips: Speedup
- Almost full hard drive? Some solutions. Out of Space
- Apple Battery Info. Battery
QUOTE Thanks
bobtomay

 
bobtomay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 22, 2006
Location: Texas, where else?
Posts: 25,054
bobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.33 C2D 256 4GB, MBA 13" i7 1.8, MB 2.0 2GB, Nano 4th, 3GS, iPad 1

bobtomay is offline
sorry, no...

the nVidia 9400M is rated lower than the ATI X1600 which has no relation to and blows away the Intel x3100

The X1600 was at the top end of 3D mobile cards at the time.

back in a minute and will post link to a chart

Here is a mobile chart

Mobile chip curent rankings
Intel x3100: 199
nVidia geforce 9400m: 137
ATI X1600: 122 - this chip is approximately equivalent to the older desktop X800 XT and still a nice card for those running older 4x/8x AGP systems.
nVidia 9600: 90

If you are looking for an upgrade in 3D graphics capabilities, wouldn't even consider giving up that X1600 for a 9400M. The 9600 would give you a nice bump.

If you are doing general computing and video, then the 9400M will be fine and does provide up to double the vram.

I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.
QUOTE Thanks
TracyE

 
Member Since: Feb 07, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2
TracyE is on a distinguished road

TracyE is offline
Thanks all for the informed opinions.

Acording to the charts, the older ATI in the MBP doesseem to rule on the 3D mark tests.

But for basic Core Graphic speed (Motion, Quicktime, etc.) am I correct in assuming that the 3D component is not in play? Do I just need 3D for FPS shooters and such, or does the 3D power show up in apps I am unaware of?
QUOTE Thanks
pigoo3

 
pigoo3's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 20, 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 27,384
pigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond reputepigoo3 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 13" MB 2.4ghz, 2gig ram, OS 10.7.5

pigoo3 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtomay View Post
sorry, no...

Mobile chip curent rankings
Intel x3100: 199
nVidia geforce 9400m: 137
ATI X1600: 122 - this chip is approximately equivalent to the older desktop X800 XT and still a nice card for those running older 4x/8x AGP systems.
nVidia 9600: 90
Bob,

Using the data/scores from the link in your earlier post:

- x3100: 199
- 9400m: 137

How the heck then do we make sense of Apples claims that the 9400m is up to 6.1x faster than the x3100?

- Nick

- Computer slow, too many "beachballs", read this: Beachballs
- Computer seems slower than it used to? Read this for some speedup tips: Speedup
- Almost full hard drive? Some solutions. Out of Space
- Apple Battery Info. Battery
QUOTE Thanks
bobtomay

 
bobtomay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 22, 2006
Location: Texas, where else?
Posts: 25,054
bobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond reputebobtomay has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 15" MBP 2.33 C2D 256 4GB, MBA 13" i7 1.8, MB 2.0 2GB, Nano 4th, 3GS, iPad 1

bobtomay is offline
That is the card ranking from best to worst, #1 to #???, not a score or benchmark.

Haven't compared scores in awhile, and don't know about the 6.1x faster, but I'd feel confident in saying the 9400 is a far superior chipset compared to that Intel piece of garbage everyone (not just Apple) was using in their low end notebooks for a year or two.

And yes, if you're primarily doing video, then the 3D benchmarks will not come into play. There are plenty of folks using the mini for an HTPC.

I cannot be held responsible for the things that come out of my mouth.
In the Windows world, most everything folks don't understand is called a virus.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« 1 monitor, 2 monitor, 3 monitor, 4?? | 27" Flickering Screen firmware update ... »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MacBook Pro or Mac mini Vexan Switcher Hangout 10 09-26-2009 09:52 AM
Connect a Mac Mini to a Macbook Pro? Charlotte_RG Apple Notebooks 4 06-03-2007 02:38 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?