Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

Mini Owners should read this


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
EvoMac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

It seems that if you use a firewire drive for your mini, you can see up to 75% increase in disk performance.

Click Here for Article
QUOTE Thanks
fearlessfreap24

 
fearlessfreap24's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 09, 2005
Location: Near San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,339
fearlessfreap24 is just really nicefearlessfreap24 is just really nicefearlessfreap24 is just really nicefearlessfreap24 is just really nice
Mac Specs: MacBook Pro 13" | MacBook Pro 13" | Mac Mini 2GHz C2D

fearlessfreap24 is offline
that is great info.

QUOTE Thanks
mcsenerd

 
Member Since: Feb 25, 2005
Posts: 190
mcsenerd is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Mac Mini 1.58 - 60 GB 7200 RPM Hard Drive - 1 GB PC3200 & 1.33 Ghz 12" iBook w/ 80 GB 7200 RPM HD

mcsenerd is offline
The day I bought my mini I stuck a 60Gb 7200 RPM drive in it...I think it's a roughly similar performance increase and it's internal and keeps it portable. But yes, the cost is greater and you have to take your mini apart.
QUOTE Thanks
djmitch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

You guys make it sound as though the 4200 RPM drive is from the Stone Age or something! It can't be THAT bad, can it?
QUOTE Thanks
EvoMac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Not that its really THAT bad, but it definitly puts a bottleneck on the mini / iBook.
QUOTE Thanks
mcsenerd

 
Member Since: Feb 25, 2005
Posts: 190
mcsenerd is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Mac Mini 1.58 - 60 GB 7200 RPM Hard Drive - 1 GB PC3200 & 1.33 Ghz 12" iBook w/ 80 GB 7200 RPM HD

mcsenerd is offline
I'd say the HD spindle speed/Seek time/transfer rate = the biggest slowdown in iBook/mini. Next on my particular list of issues...puny underpowered/out-of-date/undermemoried video chipset.
QUOTE Thanks
djmitch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcsenerd
I'd say the HD spindle speed/Seek time/transfer rate = the biggest slowdown in iBook/mini. Next on my particular list of issues...puny underpowered/out-of-date/undermemoried video chipset.
No offense, mcsenerd, but it seems like you should have gone for an iMac or something. The extra money you must have spent maxing-out your Mini beyond its intended specs would likely have paid for one!

I too struggled with the Mini issues of "slow" disk speed (i.e. a few extra seconds here and there -- tragedy!!) and low VRAM, but let's face it: the Mini is NOT intended to be some kind of power machine! That what PowerMacs and PowerBooks are for, am I right? So I've taken the plunge a bought the Mini knowing that it will easily handle my everyday tasks and light gaming requirements and, according to many posts, even some moderately-intense Photoshopping and other graphics work when needed.

If I felt I had to install an internal 7,200 RPM drive, get a faster alternative to the SuperDrive, and over-clock my processor to make my Mini just so, I would have bought an iMac or PowerMac and avoided the hassle. Just my 2 cents worth, and pardon me if I appear a little grouchy about this - I'm just growing really weary of people expecting the Mini to somehow be more than it was intended to be. That's why Apple sells more than one kind of Mac.
QUOTE Thanks
JSchultz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Agreed. 64 mb VRAM + 7200 rpm hdd = teh wins on iBook/Mini. a whole different machine.

And there is a noticable difference between the hdd's RPM speed. Toy with a mini, then go to a powermac with a 7200 rpm hdd. BIIIG difference.
QUOTE Thanks
JSchultz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by djmitch
No offense, mcsenerd, but it seems like you should have gone for an iMac or something. The extra money you must have spent maxing-out your Mini beyond its intended specs would likely have paid for one!

I too struggled with the Mini issues of "slow" disk speed (i.e. a few extra seconds here and there -- tragedy!!) and low VRAM, but let's face it: the Mini is NOT intended to be some kind of power machine! That what PowerMacs and PowerBooks are for, am I right? So I've taken the plunge a bought the Mini knowing that it will easily handle my everyday tasks and light gaming requirements and, according to many posts, even some moderately-intense Photoshopping and other graphics work when needed.

If I felt I had to install an internal 7,200 RPM drive, get a faster alternative to the SuperDrive, and over-clock my processor to make my Mini just so, I would have bought an iMac or PowerMac and avoided the hassle. Just my 2 cents worth, and pardon me if I appear a little grouchy about this - I'm just growing really weary of people expecting the Mini to somehow be more than it was intended to be. That's why Apple sells more than one kind of Mac.
But maybe he didn't want a white all in one machine! :yinyang:

Or he wanted to save space, or be different.
QUOTE Thanks
djmitch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSchultz
But maybe he didn't want a white all in one machine! :yinyang:
Good point - that's the exact same reason I've bought a Mini, although I debated for a couple of weeks about the single 1.8GHz PowerMac because of the extra power. I eventually realized I didn't need it, however, especially given the huge extra cost.

Quote:
Or he wanted to save space, or be different.
More good points! I hope I haven't jumped to a conclusion about mcsenerd. However, I'm not sure how much of a factor space is when one wants a powerful computer.
QUOTE Thanks
walkerj

 
walkerj's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 13, 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 1,186
walkerj is just really nicewalkerj is just really nicewalkerj is just really nicewalkerj is just really nice
Mac Specs: 13" Macbook Pro 2.26Ghz Unibody 4G RAM 160G HDD Superdrive

walkerj is offline
I have a Mini for two reasons: It was a cheap way to become a Mac person, and I have a lovely if heavy 20" CRT monitor that still has plenty of life left in it. My next Mac will be a 20" iMac G5, but that's out there in the future.

My real question, however, is does this firewire-as-primary-disk really speed things up in an appreciable, noticeable way? Because I will be upgrading the amount of disk space I have available since that is simply the way things go - as you go along you collect more stuff. Especially if you, as I do, work with audio (albeit very amateur) and especially video. If switching the primary drive to a firewire drive that I'm going to be buying anyway is going to also result in a performance increase I'm all over that, but I would want to have an idea that it would actually work before I bothered to go to that trouble. Not that I have a real issue with the Mini's speed at the moment, but any performance increase is welcome.
QUOTE Thanks
pritsey

 
Member Since: May 20, 2004
Posts: 14
pritsey is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: 12" 1GHz ibook, 20 gig 4G ipod

pritsey is offline
I take it that if you use a firewire drive as the primary, that you can still use the internal drive for storage?
QUOTE Thanks
EvoMac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Yes, you would just make the firewire drive the bootable hdd. Use the internal for storage.
QUOTE Thanks
mcsenerd

 
Member Since: Feb 25, 2005
Posts: 190
mcsenerd is on a distinguished road
Mac Specs: Mac Mini 1.58 - 60 GB 7200 RPM Hard Drive - 1 GB PC3200 & 1.33 Ghz 12" iBook w/ 80 GB 7200 RPM HD

mcsenerd is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmitch
No offense, mcsenerd, but it seems like you should have gone for an iMac or something. The extra money you must have spent maxing-out your Mini beyond its intended specs would likely have paid for one! ...
Ah no doubt my friend...but you see I'm a die-hard hacker/tweaker/tinkerer/messser-upper/insert-your-phrase-here! I've been tearing things up and trying to make them better/bigger/louder/whatever ever since I could twist a screwdriver. I'm one of those people whose parent's always accused them of never being happy with anything the way it is...I've just got to mess with things. I know dang good and well that I'm not the typical machead...I think most apple/mac have more fanish-type emotions tied to their machines and wouldn't dare touch or modify them thereby jeapordizing the machines pristine state...I however, harbour no fandom towards any manufacturer in particular. I likely would never have bought a mac at all if not for the mini. I just thought it was sleek, sexy, cool, and hey...it ran OS X and I was ready to give it a try...plus as was stated as well...I had a very nice Viewsonic 20" CRT that I wasn't really ready to throw on the scrap heap yet.
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« ::LONG POST WARNING::: Need to Get The Power Mac G5 Serviced. But... | iMac G5 inside pics? Bluetooth antenna? »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Question for Mini Mac owners - Software related dj_white_rice Apple Desktops 3 02-16-2006 10:49 AM
A mini-guide to Mac OS X for new Mini owners rman Apple Desktops 2 02-15-2006 03:02 PM
First impressions my of Mini - plus some pics. silverpenguin Apple Desktops 20 05-01-2005 09:04 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?