New To Mac-Forums?

Welcome to our community! Join the discussion today by registering your FREE account. If you have any problems with the registration process, please contact us!

Get your questions answered by community gurus Advice and insight from world-class Apple enthusiasts Exclusive access to members-only contests, giveaways and deals

Join today!

 
Start a Discussion
 

Mac-Forums Brief

Subscribe to Mac-Forums Brief to receive special offers from Mac-Forums partners and sponsors

Join the conversation RSS
Apple Desktops Discussion of Apple's desktop machines including Mac Pro, iMac, Power Mac, and mini

mini - Is it enough


Post Reply New Thread Subscribe

 
Thread Tools
ras61l

 
Member Since: Mar 12, 2009
Posts: 2
ras61l is on a distinguished road

ras61l is offline
i am looking into purchasing one of the new mac mini's. i am a biological scientist, so am looking to use it primarily for making figures for manuscripts using adobe cs4 and a few other statistical programs, etc. also, since some of these programs are only compatible with windows, i was hoping to also be able to install windows and a few programs on it. my question is: is the mac mini powerful enough to perform all these tasks without being frustratingly slow or freezing? any input would be great. i am hoping not to have to spend the money for a pro. thanks.
QUOTE Thanks
harryb2448

 
harryb2448's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 28, 2007
Location: Nambucca Heads Australia
Posts: 17,549
harryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond reputeharryb2448 has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: iMac i5 2.7GHz OS X.9.4 and OS X.10

harryb2448 is offline
G'day and welcome to the forums.

Guess you are going to have to wait until a respondent comes online who has even got the new Mac Mini.

For what is is worth personally would go for a Mac Pro with 3.5" HDD, superdrive, upgradeable graphics card etc as you are no doubt a power user and the multi core processors will be the go.
QUOTE Thanks
chscag

 
chscag's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 39,669
chscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond reputechscag has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 27" iMac i5, 3.2 GHz, iPad 3, iPhone 5c, 3 iPods, OS X Mavericks

chscag is offline
Without knowing exactly what the statistical programs you have require in the way of processor power and memory, it's difficult to say. The new Mini does have a more powerful processor and GPU, but will it suffice for you...?

You might be better off with a MacBook Pro or possibly with a top of the line unibody aluminum MacBook. Both more expensive than the Mini, but much more capable.

Regards.
QUOTE Thanks
vansmith

 
vansmith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 17,894
vansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond reputevansmith has a reputation beyond repute
Mac Specs: 2012 13" MBP (2.5 i5, 8GB)

vansmith is offline
While this may not be the best advice you get (not being a mini or pro owner myself), take a look at the system requirements (recommended requirements would be better than the minimum) and match it up with the specs of the mini and pro.

Important Links: Community Guidelines : Use the reputation system if you've been helped.
M-F Blog :: Write for the blog
Writing a Quality Post
QUOTE Thanks
the8thark

 
Member Since: Jan 27, 2007
Location: *Brisvegas*
Posts: 5,658
the8thark is a name known to allthe8thark is a name known to allthe8thark is a name known to allthe8thark is a name known to allthe8thark is a name known to allthe8thark is a name known to allthe8thark is a name known to all
Mac Specs: 17 inch 2 GHz C2D imac (5,1) with 3GB DDR2 RAM, X1600 (128MB memory) GPU - OSX 10.6.3

the8thark is offline
With many biological computer applications like DNA mapping and folding, sure many lower spec'd computers can do the job. They just take ages because of the intense processing power needed. I'm not saying a new mini will fail at this task. I'm just saying what will be the best use of your time.

If I were you I'd look on the net and ask google to find other mac users of the various biological applications you want to use. And see their responses. And I think the same would go for if you needed to use a 3D rendering app to design some molecule or structure.

But for stuff like photoshop and bootcamp and other such things the new mini should fly.
QUOTE Thanks
ultratech54

 
ultratech54's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 15, 2009
Posts: 1
ultratech54 is on a distinguished road

ultratech54 is offline
I use a mac mini and I am in the medical field and it suits me just fine. As a matter of fact I recently upgraded my ram to 2GB and I have a 160GB external hard drive to back up my mac mini hard drive. It's a great little machine...invest in it!

ultratech54










Quote:
Originally Posted by ras61l View Post
i am looking into purchasing one of the new mac mini's. i am a biological scientist, so am looking to use it primarily for making figures for manuscripts using adobe cs4 and a few other statistical programs, etc. also, since some of these programs are only compatible with windows, i was hoping to also be able to install windows and a few programs on it. my question is: is the mac mini powerful enough to perform all these tasks without being frustratingly slow or freezing? any input would be great. i am hoping not to have to spend the money for a pro. thanks.
QUOTE Thanks
ras61l

 
Member Since: Mar 12, 2009
Posts: 2
ras61l is on a distinguished road

ras61l is offline
Thanks for the responses. They have been helpful. Any recommendations as to whether the upgrade from the 2.0 GHz to the 2.26 GHz is worth the investment?
QUOTE Thanks

Post Reply New Thread Subscribe


« Quicksilver G4 Processor Question | Mac Mini Target Disk Mode Backup Drive »
Thread Tools

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
X

Welcome to Mac-Forums.com

Create your username to jump into the discussion!

New members like you have made this community the ultimate source for your Mac since 2003!


(4 digit year)

Already a member?