Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Quad Vs. Dual

  1. #1


    Member Since
    May 15, 2008
    Posts
    203
    Quad Vs. Dual
    Hi guys,
    I am kind of new here and in a rush but a quick question

    Is Two 2.66GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon processors better than One 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor

    If you guys can let me know quickly that be great

    Thanks


    Jawad

  2. #2

    ogacon's Avatar
    Member Since
    Mar 16, 2008
    Location
    Twin Cities (Suburbs) Minnesota
    Posts
    645
    Specs:
     15" 2.4 MBP  iPod Classic 80 GB, Silver
    edit: wait... I'm dumb. I misread, I thought you said single core.. haha
    Relay For Life Support me in Relay For Life! Run by American Cancer Society. Cancer research.
    What sound does your Rooster make?

  3. #3

    mac57's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location
    St. Somewhere
    Posts
    4,560
    Specs:
    iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, 256 GB SSD, 2 TB HDD, 8 GB RAM
    The single quad core is better. The new Xeons feature more on board cache, which means that the cores simply run faster. Also of course, the new Xeons are Penryns. Of and by themselves, these are reported to run about 10% faster, clock for clock, than the preceeding chips.
    My Macs: iMac 27" 3.4 GHz, Mac Pro 3.2 GHz, PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5 GHz, G4 Cube with 1.2 GHz Upgrade
    My iStuff: 64GB iPhone 5, 64GB iPad4, 30GB iPod Video, 16GB iPod Touch
    My OS': Mac OS X Lion, Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Mac OS X Tiger, Mac OS 9.2.2, openSUSE 10.3
    I was on the Mac-Forums honor roll for September 2007

  4. #4

    bryphotoguy's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    3,978
    Specs:
    Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
    2.8GHz > 2.66GHz

    January 2008 Member of the Month

  5. #5

    cowasaki's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 12, 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    408
    Specs:
    Mac pro Quad Xeon; 15" Retina Macbook Pro; macbooks (family); Macbook pro 17"; intel & G4 iMacs.
    ********* IGNORE THIS I MISREAD THE POST *********

    Wow not so fast.....

    It depends on WHAT you are doing. The newer processor IS faster for the same clock speed.

    Therefore a 3.0GHz processor from a version 2 pro is faster than a 3.0GHz processor from a version 1.

    Therefore the newer 2.8GHz processor is faster than the 2.66GHz - nobody would argue with that BUT having 4 cores rather than 2 cores WILL be quicker IF the software is optimised for multiple cores. In an ideal world a quad core 2.66 would be the speed of a 10.64 but that is never going to happen.

    Both machines would be fast machines. The 2.8 would probably have the edge in day to day running and the 2.66 quad would have the edge with some of the professional apps than are more optimised.
    Experienced computer user, applications programmer and component level service engineer but came to the Apple platform with intro of intel!. Pro-photographer and director of electronics company.

  6. #6

    bryphotoguy's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    3,978
    Specs:
    Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
    cowasaki- the 2.66GHz is also a quad core. It would also suffer the same slow downs single and dual core apps. There is no optimization that I know of so I doubt the software is smart enough to send info to only one of the dual core 2.66GHz processors. It always sent the info randomly when I had the 2.66.

    January 2008 Member of the Month

  7. #7

    cowasaki's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 12, 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    408
    Specs:
    Mac pro Quad Xeon; 15" Retina Macbook Pro; macbooks (family); Macbook pro 17"; intel & G4 iMacs.
    Quote Originally Posted by bryphotoguy View Post
    cowasaki- the 2.66GHz is also a quad core. It would also suffer the same slow downs single and dual core apps. There is no optimization that I know of so I doubt the software is smart enough to send info to only one of the dual core 2.66GHz processors. It always sent the info randomly when I had the 2.66.
    Ignore my answer I for some reason thought you were comparing a dual 2.8 and quad 2.66. I obviously didn't read the post properly. woooopsss
    Experienced computer user, applications programmer and component level service engineer but came to the Apple platform with intro of intel!. Pro-photographer and director of electronics company.

  8. #8

    bryphotoguy's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 02, 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    3,978
    Specs:
    Quad 2.8GHz Mac Pro, Edge iPhone
    But what you said is right. Most apps are designed for only one, maybe two cores. All of these apps will perform better on a single dual core machine of the same speed quad core or oct core machine.

    January 2008 Member of the Month

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. i5 quad vs i7 dual
    By junk4jeff in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-06-2015, 11:38 PM
  2. Mac G5 quad or dual
    By Idofotos in forum Switcher Hangout
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-21-2011, 10:56 PM
  3. "Harpertown" Dual Quad 3.0 vs. "Nehalem" Dual Quad 2.26?
    By john2in3 in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-14-2011, 04:45 PM
  4. G5 quad but its dual
    By dazat5 in forum Apple Desktops
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 05:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •