View Single Post
Posts: n/a

No, that osn't the point--the point is so much more was promised for Vista, genuinely technological advancements that would have put it quite far in front, slowly a lot of these features have been dropped or watered down, meaning that in terms of what it offers, is no real different to OS X Tiger which will have been out for 18 months by the time Vista lands.

The disappointment is how much Vista was meant to be a huge leap forward, and the reality is that it is an incremental upgrade--not the fac that now Windows resembles OS X Tiger it has become bad.

It is not a bad OS--it is bad because so much was promised but nothing fulfilled.